基于锥入度试验评估土壤在垂直方向高度异质区域的空间变异性特征

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Chengfu Chu, Yuhang Wang, Hongxiang Song, Long Xu, Xiaoliang Hou, Shanshan Sheng, Lingling Liu
{"title":"基于锥入度试验评估土壤在垂直方向高度异质区域的空间变异性特征","authors":"Chengfu Chu, Yuhang Wang, Hongxiang Song, Long Xu, Xiaoliang Hou, Shanshan Sheng, Lingling Liu","doi":"10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2023_184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Key parameters describing the spatial variability of soil properties based on the random field theory are the scale of fluctuation (SOF) and coefficient of variation (COV). To characterize the spatial variability of soil properties, reducing the impact of these errors and uncertainties is necessary. To accomplish this, for the five main layers of soil, we collected 18 cone penetration test (CPT) data from a highly heterogeneous region in Lianyungang New Airport, Jiangsu Province, China, and used the control variable method to analyze the influence of the estimation method of tendency, its function type and outliers. The results show that, compared with the ordinary least square method (OLSM), the least absolute deviation method (LADM) can more truly reflect the trend component of CPT parameters in the vertical direction, and the influence of other factors on SOF and COV is also studied, such as outliers and estimation functions of trend components. On this basis, a reasonable calculation process of SOF and COV is summarized, which provides a reference for the calculation of SOF and COV in vertical direction in the future. By comparing the SOF calculated by different models, the results show that the squared exponential (SQX) model has the highest SOF in 68.3% of the evaluation, and the single exponential (SNX) model has the lowest SOF in 64.4% of the evaluation. Moreover, we compared the SOF and COV of cone tip resistance (qc) and sleeve friction (fs), which showed that SOF of qc and COV of qc is lower than that of fs in 54.4 and 73.3% of all evaluations, respectively.","PeriodicalId":18147,"journal":{"name":"Lithosphere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Characteristics of Spatial Variability of Soil in Vertical Direction Highly Heterogeneous Region Based on Cone Penetration Test\",\"authors\":\"Chengfu Chu, Yuhang Wang, Hongxiang Song, Long Xu, Xiaoliang Hou, Shanshan Sheng, Lingling Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2023_184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Key parameters describing the spatial variability of soil properties based on the random field theory are the scale of fluctuation (SOF) and coefficient of variation (COV). To characterize the spatial variability of soil properties, reducing the impact of these errors and uncertainties is necessary. To accomplish this, for the five main layers of soil, we collected 18 cone penetration test (CPT) data from a highly heterogeneous region in Lianyungang New Airport, Jiangsu Province, China, and used the control variable method to analyze the influence of the estimation method of tendency, its function type and outliers. The results show that, compared with the ordinary least square method (OLSM), the least absolute deviation method (LADM) can more truly reflect the trend component of CPT parameters in the vertical direction, and the influence of other factors on SOF and COV is also studied, such as outliers and estimation functions of trend components. On this basis, a reasonable calculation process of SOF and COV is summarized, which provides a reference for the calculation of SOF and COV in vertical direction in the future. By comparing the SOF calculated by different models, the results show that the squared exponential (SQX) model has the highest SOF in 68.3% of the evaluation, and the single exponential (SNX) model has the lowest SOF in 64.4% of the evaluation. Moreover, we compared the SOF and COV of cone tip resistance (qc) and sleeve friction (fs), which showed that SOF of qc and COV of qc is lower than that of fs in 54.4 and 73.3% of all evaluations, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithosphere\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2023_184\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithosphere","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2023_184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于随机场理论描述土壤特性空间变异性的关键参数是波动尺度(SOF)和变异系数(COV)。要描述土壤特性的空间变异性,就必须减少这些误差和不确定性的影响。为此,我们在江苏省连云港新机场的一个高度异质性区域采集了 18 个锥入度试验(CPT)数据,针对五个主要土层,采用控制变量法分析了倾向估计方法、其函数类型和异常值的影响。结果表明,与普通最小二乘法(OLSM)相比,最小绝对偏差法(LADM)能更真实地反映CPT参数在垂直方向上的趋势分量,同时还研究了异常值、趋势分量估计函数等其他因素对SOF和COV的影响。在此基础上,总结出合理的 SOF 和 COV 计算过程,为今后垂直方向 SOF 和 COV 的计算提供参考。通过比较不同模型计算出的 SOF,结果表明平方指数(SQX)模型在 68.3% 的评估中 SOF 最高,单指数(SNX)模型在 64.4% 的评估中 SOF 最低。此外,我们还比较了锥尖阻力(qc)和套筒摩擦力(fs)的 SOF 和 COV,结果表明在所有评估中,qc 的 SOF 和 COV 分别有 54.4% 和 73.3% 低于fs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Characteristics of Spatial Variability of Soil in Vertical Direction Highly Heterogeneous Region Based on Cone Penetration Test
Key parameters describing the spatial variability of soil properties based on the random field theory are the scale of fluctuation (SOF) and coefficient of variation (COV). To characterize the spatial variability of soil properties, reducing the impact of these errors and uncertainties is necessary. To accomplish this, for the five main layers of soil, we collected 18 cone penetration test (CPT) data from a highly heterogeneous region in Lianyungang New Airport, Jiangsu Province, China, and used the control variable method to analyze the influence of the estimation method of tendency, its function type and outliers. The results show that, compared with the ordinary least square method (OLSM), the least absolute deviation method (LADM) can more truly reflect the trend component of CPT parameters in the vertical direction, and the influence of other factors on SOF and COV is also studied, such as outliers and estimation functions of trend components. On this basis, a reasonable calculation process of SOF and COV is summarized, which provides a reference for the calculation of SOF and COV in vertical direction in the future. By comparing the SOF calculated by different models, the results show that the squared exponential (SQX) model has the highest SOF in 68.3% of the evaluation, and the single exponential (SNX) model has the lowest SOF in 64.4% of the evaluation. Moreover, we compared the SOF and COV of cone tip resistance (qc) and sleeve friction (fs), which showed that SOF of qc and COV of qc is lower than that of fs in 54.4 and 73.3% of all evaluations, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lithosphere
Lithosphere GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-GEOLOGY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
284
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The open access journal will have an expanded scope covering research in all areas of earth, planetary, and environmental sciences, providing a unique publishing choice for authors in the geoscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信