Andriana Nikolova, Sean Agbor-Enoh, S. Bos, Marisa Crespo-Leiro, Stephan Ensminger, Marta Jimenez-Blanco, Annamaria Minervini, Michael Perch, Javier Segovia, Robin Vos, Kiran Khush, Luciano Potena
{"title":"欧洲器官移植学会 (ESOT) 关于使用非侵入性生物标志物监测心胸移植排斥反应的共识声明","authors":"Andriana Nikolova, Sean Agbor-Enoh, S. Bos, Marisa Crespo-Leiro, Stephan Ensminger, Marta Jimenez-Blanco, Annamaria Minervini, Michael Perch, Javier Segovia, Robin Vos, Kiran Khush, Luciano Potena","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.12445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field’s incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":506324,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"25 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance\",\"authors\":\"Andriana Nikolova, Sean Agbor-Enoh, S. Bos, Marisa Crespo-Leiro, Stephan Ensminger, Marta Jimenez-Blanco, Annamaria Minervini, Michael Perch, Javier Segovia, Robin Vos, Kiran Khush, Luciano Potena\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ti.2024.12445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field’s incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant International\",\"volume\":\"25 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
同种异体移植排斥反应(AR)继续威胁着心胸移植手术的成功,而缺乏准确、可重复的监测工具来诊断AR是心胸移植受者临床管理中尚未满足的一大需求。心内膜活检(EMB)和经支气管活检(TBBx)自该领域初创以来一直是排斥反应监测的基石,但这两种方法都存在很大的局限性,包括病理学家对活检解释的一致性较差。近年来,用于 AR 监测的新型分子工具不断涌现,多项研究对其性能特点进行了评估。由 ESOT 召集的一个国际工作组对现有文献进行了审查,并提出了一系列建议,以指导这些生物标记物在临床实践中的应用。该工作组承认存在一些注意事项,但同时认为基因表达谱分析和供体来源的无细胞DNA(dd-cfDNA)可用于排除心脏移植受者的排斥反应,但不建议用于心脏移植物血管病变筛查。其他传统生物标志物(NT-proBNP、BNP 或肌钙蛋白)没有足够的证据支持用于诊断 AR。关于肺移植,dd-cfDNA 可用于排除临床排斥反应和感染,但不建议用于监测治疗反应。
European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance
While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field’s incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.