融合有限元和机器学习方法预测岩石剪切强度参数

IF 1.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Defu Zhu, Biaobiao Yu, Deyu Wang, Yujiang Zhang
{"title":"融合有限元和机器学习方法预测岩石剪切强度参数","authors":"Defu Zhu, Biaobiao Yu, Deyu Wang, Yujiang Zhang","doi":"10.1093/jge/gxae064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The trial-and-error method for calibrating rock mechanics parameters has the disadvantages in complexity, time-consuming and difficulty in ensuring accuracy. Harnessing the repeatability and scalability intrinsic to numerical simulation calculations and amalgamating them with the data-driven attributes of machine learning methods. The study utilised the finite element analysis software RS2 to establish 252 sets of sandstone sample data. The Recursive Feature Elimination and Cross-Validation (RFECV) method was employed for feature selection. The shear strength parameters of sandstone were predicted using machine learning models optimised by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, including BP neural network (BP), Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). The predicted value of cohesion is proposed as the input feature to predict the friction angle. The results indicate that the optimal input characteristics for predicting cohesion are elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, peak stress, and peak strain, while the optimal input characteristics for predicting friction angle are peak stress and cohesion. The PSO-SVR model demonstrates the best performance. The maximum error between the predicted values of cohesion and friction angle and the calculated results of RSData program is 3.5% and 4.31%, respectively. The finite element calculation is in good agreement with the stress-strain curve obtained in the laboratory. The sensitivity analysis indicates that SVR's prediction performance for cohesion and friction angle tends to be stable when the sample size is greater than 25. These results offer a valuable reference for accurately predicting rock mechanics parameters.","PeriodicalId":54820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fusion of finite element and machine learning methods to predict rock shear strength parameters\",\"authors\":\"Defu Zhu, Biaobiao Yu, Deyu Wang, Yujiang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jge/gxae064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The trial-and-error method for calibrating rock mechanics parameters has the disadvantages in complexity, time-consuming and difficulty in ensuring accuracy. Harnessing the repeatability and scalability intrinsic to numerical simulation calculations and amalgamating them with the data-driven attributes of machine learning methods. The study utilised the finite element analysis software RS2 to establish 252 sets of sandstone sample data. The Recursive Feature Elimination and Cross-Validation (RFECV) method was employed for feature selection. The shear strength parameters of sandstone were predicted using machine learning models optimised by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, including BP neural network (BP), Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). The predicted value of cohesion is proposed as the input feature to predict the friction angle. The results indicate that the optimal input characteristics for predicting cohesion are elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, peak stress, and peak strain, while the optimal input characteristics for predicting friction angle are peak stress and cohesion. The PSO-SVR model demonstrates the best performance. The maximum error between the predicted values of cohesion and friction angle and the calculated results of RSData program is 3.5% and 4.31%, respectively. The finite element calculation is in good agreement with the stress-strain curve obtained in the laboratory. The sensitivity analysis indicates that SVR's prediction performance for cohesion and friction angle tends to be stable when the sample size is greater than 25. These results offer a valuable reference for accurately predicting rock mechanics parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

校准岩石力学参数的试错法具有复杂、耗时和难以确保准确性等缺点。利用数值模拟计算固有的可重复性和可扩展性,并将其与机器学习方法的数据驱动属性相结合。研究利用有限元分析软件 RS2 建立了 252 组砂岩样本数据。采用递归特征消除和交叉验证(RFECV)方法进行特征选择。采用粒子群优化(PSO)算法优化的机器学习模型预测砂岩的剪切强度参数,包括 BP 神经网络(BP)、贝叶斯岭回归(BRR)、支持向量回归(SVR)和轻梯度提升机(LightGBM)。建议将内聚力的预测值作为预测摩擦角的输入特征。结果表明,预测内聚力的最佳输入特征是弹性模量、泊松比、峰值应力和峰值应变,而预测摩擦角的最佳输入特征是峰值应力和内聚力。PSO-SVR 模型的性能最佳。内聚力和摩擦角的预测值与 RSData 程序的计算结果之间的最大误差分别为 3.5% 和 4.31%。有限元计算结果与实验室获得的应力-应变曲线十分吻合。敏感性分析表明,当样本量大于 25 时,SVR 对内聚力和摩擦角的预测性能趋于稳定。这些结果为准确预测岩石力学参数提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fusion of finite element and machine learning methods to predict rock shear strength parameters
The trial-and-error method for calibrating rock mechanics parameters has the disadvantages in complexity, time-consuming and difficulty in ensuring accuracy. Harnessing the repeatability and scalability intrinsic to numerical simulation calculations and amalgamating them with the data-driven attributes of machine learning methods. The study utilised the finite element analysis software RS2 to establish 252 sets of sandstone sample data. The Recursive Feature Elimination and Cross-Validation (RFECV) method was employed for feature selection. The shear strength parameters of sandstone were predicted using machine learning models optimised by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, including BP neural network (BP), Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). The predicted value of cohesion is proposed as the input feature to predict the friction angle. The results indicate that the optimal input characteristics for predicting cohesion are elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, peak stress, and peak strain, while the optimal input characteristics for predicting friction angle are peak stress and cohesion. The PSO-SVR model demonstrates the best performance. The maximum error between the predicted values of cohesion and friction angle and the calculated results of RSData program is 3.5% and 4.31%, respectively. The finite element calculation is in good agreement with the stress-strain curve obtained in the laboratory. The sensitivity analysis indicates that SVR's prediction performance for cohesion and friction angle tends to be stable when the sample size is greater than 25. These results offer a valuable reference for accurately predicting rock mechanics parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
87
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering aims to promote research and developments in geophysics and related areas of engineering. It has a predominantly applied science and engineering focus, but solicits and accepts high-quality contributions in all earth-physics disciplines, including geodynamics, natural and controlled-source seismology, oil, gas and mineral exploration, petrophysics and reservoir geophysics. The journal covers those aspects of engineering that are closely related to geophysics, or on the targets and problems that geophysics addresses. Typically, this is engineering focused on the subsurface, particularly petroleum engineering, rock mechanics, geophysical software engineering, drilling technology, remote sensing, instrumentation and sensor design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信