Sajid Mohy Ul Din, Ahmad Adeel, Sheher Yar Khan, Parsa Rani
{"title":"董事会性别多样性、公司生命周期与公司风险承担之间的关系","authors":"Sajid Mohy Ul Din, Ahmad Adeel, Sheher Yar Khan, Parsa Rani","doi":"10.1177/09721509241253052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on corporate risk-taking, moderated by the firm life cycle stages. Data from 200 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (2018–2022) were analyzed using the system generalized method of moments. Corporate risk-taking, the dependent, was measured using systematic risk and total-risk proxies. Results showed that board gender diversity had an insignificant effect, firm life cycle had a negative significant impact, while the interaction term (board gender diversity and firm life cycle) showed a positively significant impact on risk-taking measured by total risk. In contrast, both factors, along with their interaction, positively influenced risk-taking when assessed through systematic risk. The study further segmented the firm life cycle into five distinct stages, finding that the impact of board gender diversity on risk-taking varied across stages. For instance, at the introduction and maturity stages, board gender diversity positively affected risk-taking for both proxies. However, at the growth and decline stages, its impact was insignificant. These findings suggest variability in the relationship between board gender diversity and risk-taking, potentially influenced by the choice of risk proxies. Theoretically, this study contributes to the body of knowledge on how a firm’s life cycle and board gender diversity influence corporate risk-taking. This study’s insight also holds significant implications for corporate governance and policymaking because, contrary to popular belief, the findings suggest that board gender diversity does not uniformly reduce risk-taking; instead, its impact varies with the firm’s life cycle stage.","PeriodicalId":47569,"journal":{"name":"Global Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Board Gender Diversity, Firm Life Cycle and Corporate Risk-taking\",\"authors\":\"Sajid Mohy Ul Din, Ahmad Adeel, Sheher Yar Khan, Parsa Rani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09721509241253052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on corporate risk-taking, moderated by the firm life cycle stages. Data from 200 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (2018–2022) were analyzed using the system generalized method of moments. Corporate risk-taking, the dependent, was measured using systematic risk and total-risk proxies. Results showed that board gender diversity had an insignificant effect, firm life cycle had a negative significant impact, while the interaction term (board gender diversity and firm life cycle) showed a positively significant impact on risk-taking measured by total risk. In contrast, both factors, along with their interaction, positively influenced risk-taking when assessed through systematic risk. The study further segmented the firm life cycle into five distinct stages, finding that the impact of board gender diversity on risk-taking varied across stages. For instance, at the introduction and maturity stages, board gender diversity positively affected risk-taking for both proxies. However, at the growth and decline stages, its impact was insignificant. These findings suggest variability in the relationship between board gender diversity and risk-taking, potentially influenced by the choice of risk proxies. Theoretically, this study contributes to the body of knowledge on how a firm’s life cycle and board gender diversity influence corporate risk-taking. This study’s insight also holds significant implications for corporate governance and policymaking because, contrary to popular belief, the findings suggest that board gender diversity does not uniformly reduce risk-taking; instead, its impact varies with the firm’s life cycle stage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241253052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241253052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Relationship Between Board Gender Diversity, Firm Life Cycle and Corporate Risk-taking
This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on corporate risk-taking, moderated by the firm life cycle stages. Data from 200 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (2018–2022) were analyzed using the system generalized method of moments. Corporate risk-taking, the dependent, was measured using systematic risk and total-risk proxies. Results showed that board gender diversity had an insignificant effect, firm life cycle had a negative significant impact, while the interaction term (board gender diversity and firm life cycle) showed a positively significant impact on risk-taking measured by total risk. In contrast, both factors, along with their interaction, positively influenced risk-taking when assessed through systematic risk. The study further segmented the firm life cycle into five distinct stages, finding that the impact of board gender diversity on risk-taking varied across stages. For instance, at the introduction and maturity stages, board gender diversity positively affected risk-taking for both proxies. However, at the growth and decline stages, its impact was insignificant. These findings suggest variability in the relationship between board gender diversity and risk-taking, potentially influenced by the choice of risk proxies. Theoretically, this study contributes to the body of knowledge on how a firm’s life cycle and board gender diversity influence corporate risk-taking. This study’s insight also holds significant implications for corporate governance and policymaking because, contrary to popular belief, the findings suggest that board gender diversity does not uniformly reduce risk-taking; instead, its impact varies with the firm’s life cycle stage.
期刊介绍:
Global Business Review is designed to be a forum for the wider dissemination of current management and business practice and research drawn from around the globe but with an emphasis on Asian and Indian perspectives. An important feature is its cross-cultural and comparative approach. Multidisciplinary in nature and with a strong practical orientation, this refereed journal publishes surveys relating to and report significant developments in management practice drawn from business/commerce, the public and the private sector, and non-profit organisations. The journal also publishes articles which provide practical insights on doing business in India/Asia from local and global and macro and micro perspectives.