美国各州和地区面向公众的 C 部分早期干预网站内容分析

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Priscilla Weaver, M. Rapport, Tricia A. Catalino, Jessica Barreca
{"title":"美国各州和地区面向公众的 C 部分早期干预网站内容分析","authors":"Priscilla Weaver, M. Rapport, Tricia A. Catalino, Jessica Barreca","doi":"10.1097/IYC.0000000000000270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States (US), early intervention (EI) programs under Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act have demonstrated a commitment to teaming and collaboration through multidisciplinary assessment and coordinated service delivery. However, there continues to be broad variability as to the EI service delivery model described on public-facing EI program websites and in state-level documents. In this study, we performed a review of the websites of EI programs in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, five US territories, and two federal departments responsible for providing EI services to specific constituencies. Using a qualitative content analysis approach to analyze the data from all 58 entities led to three primary findings: (1) the challenge of finding information on public-facing websites and related documents about teaming practices within each state, (2) the inconsistency in the types of documents, dates, and ages of posted information, and (3) the variability across states, including the language used to describe and discuss teaming models and practices. These results lead to a call for action to improve the consistency of information on teaming models and the implementation of practices that better support all children and families served under Part C.","PeriodicalId":47099,"journal":{"name":"Infants & Young Children","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Content Analysis of Public-Facing Part C Early Intervention Websites of US States and Territories\",\"authors\":\"Priscilla Weaver, M. Rapport, Tricia A. Catalino, Jessica Barreca\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IYC.0000000000000270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States (US), early intervention (EI) programs under Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act have demonstrated a commitment to teaming and collaboration through multidisciplinary assessment and coordinated service delivery. However, there continues to be broad variability as to the EI service delivery model described on public-facing EI program websites and in state-level documents. In this study, we performed a review of the websites of EI programs in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, five US territories, and two federal departments responsible for providing EI services to specific constituencies. Using a qualitative content analysis approach to analyze the data from all 58 entities led to three primary findings: (1) the challenge of finding information on public-facing websites and related documents about teaming practices within each state, (2) the inconsistency in the types of documents, dates, and ages of posted information, and (3) the variability across states, including the language used to describe and discuss teaming models and practices. These results lead to a call for action to improve the consistency of information on teaming models and the implementation of practices that better support all children and families served under Part C.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infants & Young Children\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infants & Young Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000270\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infants & Young Children","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,《残障人士教育法案》C 部分规定的早期干预(EI)计划已通过多学科评估和协调服务的提供,展示了对团队合作的承诺。然而,在面向公众的儿童早期干预计划网站和州一级的文件中,对儿童早期干预服务提供模式的描述仍然存在很大差异。在本研究中,我们对美国 50 个州、哥伦比亚特区、五个美国属地和两个负责向特定人群提供幼儿保 育服务的联邦部门的幼儿保育计划网站进行了审查。使用定性内容分析法对来自所有 58 个实体的数据进行分析,得出了三个主要发现:(1)在各州面向公众的网站上查找有关团队合作实践的信息和相关文件是一项挑战;(2)发布信息的文件类型、日期和年代不一致;(3)各州之间存在差异,包括用于描述和讨论团队合作模式和实践的语言。这些结果呼吁采取行动,提高团队合作模式信息的一致性,并实施能更好地支持 C 部分服务的所有儿童和家庭的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Content Analysis of Public-Facing Part C Early Intervention Websites of US States and Territories
In the United States (US), early intervention (EI) programs under Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act have demonstrated a commitment to teaming and collaboration through multidisciplinary assessment and coordinated service delivery. However, there continues to be broad variability as to the EI service delivery model described on public-facing EI program websites and in state-level documents. In this study, we performed a review of the websites of EI programs in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, five US territories, and two federal departments responsible for providing EI services to specific constituencies. Using a qualitative content analysis approach to analyze the data from all 58 entities led to three primary findings: (1) the challenge of finding information on public-facing websites and related documents about teaming practices within each state, (2) the inconsistency in the types of documents, dates, and ages of posted information, and (3) the variability across states, including the language used to describe and discuss teaming models and practices. These results lead to a call for action to improve the consistency of information on teaming models and the implementation of practices that better support all children and families served under Part C.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Infants & Young Children is an interdisciplinary journal focusing on vulnerable children from birth to five years of age and their families. Of special interest are articles involving innovative interventions, summaries of important research developments and their implications for practice, updates for high priority topic areas, balanced presentations of controversial issues, and articles that address issues involving policy, professional training, new conceptual models, and related matters. Although data are often presented primarily to illustrate points, some types of data-based articles may be appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信