Tri Saksono, S. Zauhar, Johannes Basuki, Izzul Fatchu, Burocracia Redimensionamento, Estratégico Atraso, Estrutura Ação
{"title":"利用战略行动领域框架分析印度尼西亚政府机构的缩编情况","authors":"Tri Saksono, S. Zauhar, Johannes Basuki, Izzul Fatchu, Burocracia Redimensionamento, Estratégico Atraso, Estrutura Ação","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The purpose of this article is to find out how the strategic action field capacity of the Indonesian bureaucracy on bureaucratic simplification has been implemented.\n \nLiterature Review: The meaning of delayering, with reference to such metaphors, is commonly taken to describe the planned vertical compression of various levels of the managerial hierarchy, including the wholesale removal of one or more levels of managerial or supervisory staff from an organization's personnel roster. (Keuning and Opheij, 1994; Miller and Longair, 1985; Wheatley, 1992).\n \nMethod: This research uses qualitative research through primary data collection through interviews and secondary data through literature study.\n \nResult and Discussion: The results show that bureaucratic simplification has not been proven effective in improving the performance of the bureaucracy in Indonesia, it is still only at the stage of fulfilling administrative obligations.\n \nConclusions: Key findings as novelty in studies related to implementation of bureaucratic policy researchers with locus Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministries of Religion, Ministry for Rural and Rural Development of the Remnant, and Ministries for State Apparatus Disclosure and Reforms The bureaucracy suggests that organizational capacity must be derived from individual capacity, as the primary capital of an organization before making organizational change.","PeriodicalId":506347,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","volume":"101 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Bureacracy Downsizing in Indonesia by Using Strategic Action Field Framework\",\"authors\":\"Tri Saksono, S. Zauhar, Johannes Basuki, Izzul Fatchu, Burocracia Redimensionamento, Estratégico Atraso, Estrutura Ação\",\"doi\":\"10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The purpose of this article is to find out how the strategic action field capacity of the Indonesian bureaucracy on bureaucratic simplification has been implemented.\\n \\nLiterature Review: The meaning of delayering, with reference to such metaphors, is commonly taken to describe the planned vertical compression of various levels of the managerial hierarchy, including the wholesale removal of one or more levels of managerial or supervisory staff from an organization's personnel roster. (Keuning and Opheij, 1994; Miller and Longair, 1985; Wheatley, 1992).\\n \\nMethod: This research uses qualitative research through primary data collection through interviews and secondary data through literature study.\\n \\nResult and Discussion: The results show that bureaucratic simplification has not been proven effective in improving the performance of the bureaucracy in Indonesia, it is still only at the stage of fulfilling administrative obligations.\\n \\nConclusions: Key findings as novelty in studies related to implementation of bureaucratic policy researchers with locus Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministries of Religion, Ministry for Rural and Rural Development of the Remnant, and Ministries for State Apparatus Disclosure and Reforms The bureaucracy suggests that organizational capacity must be derived from individual capacity, as the primary capital of an organization before making organizational change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"101 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:本文旨在了解印度尼西亚官僚机构在官僚简化方面的战略行动领域能力是如何实施的。文献回顾:关于 "延迟"(delayering)的含义,通常是指有计划地纵向压缩各级管理层次,包括从一个组织的人员名册中整体撤除一个或多个级别的管理或监督人员(Keuning 和 Opheij,1994 年;Miller,1999 年)。(Keuning and Opheij, 1994; Miller and Longair, 1985; Wheatley, 1992)。研究方法:本研究采用定性研究方法,通过访谈收集第一手数据,通过文献研究收集第二手数据。结果与讨论:结果表明,官僚机构简化在提高印度尼西亚官僚机构的绩效方面并没有被证明是有效的,它仍然只停留在履行行政义务的阶段。结论:作为与实施官僚政策研究人员相关研究的新颖性的主要发现,其研究地点包括内政部、宗教部、农村和农村发展部、国家机器公开和改革部。 官僚机构认为,在进行组织变革之前,组织能力必须来源于个人能力,这是组织的首要资本。
Analysis of Bureacracy Downsizing in Indonesia by Using Strategic Action Field Framework
Introduction: The purpose of this article is to find out how the strategic action field capacity of the Indonesian bureaucracy on bureaucratic simplification has been implemented.
Literature Review: The meaning of delayering, with reference to such metaphors, is commonly taken to describe the planned vertical compression of various levels of the managerial hierarchy, including the wholesale removal of one or more levels of managerial or supervisory staff from an organization's personnel roster. (Keuning and Opheij, 1994; Miller and Longair, 1985; Wheatley, 1992).
Method: This research uses qualitative research through primary data collection through interviews and secondary data through literature study.
Result and Discussion: The results show that bureaucratic simplification has not been proven effective in improving the performance of the bureaucracy in Indonesia, it is still only at the stage of fulfilling administrative obligations.
Conclusions: Key findings as novelty in studies related to implementation of bureaucratic policy researchers with locus Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministries of Religion, Ministry for Rural and Rural Development of the Remnant, and Ministries for State Apparatus Disclosure and Reforms The bureaucracy suggests that organizational capacity must be derived from individual capacity, as the primary capital of an organization before making organizational change.