运动负荷超声心动图诊断射血分数保留型心力衰竭的方法差异--关于真实世界实践的国际调查

Yuta Tani, Y. Reddy, Frederik H Verbrugge, Jeong Hoon Yang, Kazuaki Negishi, T. Harada, Kazuki Kagami, Yuki Saito, Naoki Yuasa, H. Sorimachi, Fumitaka Murakami, T. Kato, N. Wada, H. Ishii, M. Obokata
{"title":"运动负荷超声心动图诊断射血分数保留型心力衰竭的方法差异--关于真实世界实践的国际调查","authors":"Yuta Tani, Y. Reddy, Frederik H Verbrugge, Jeong Hoon Yang, Kazuaki Negishi, T. Harada, Kazuki Kagami, Yuki Saito, Naoki Yuasa, H. Sorimachi, Fumitaka Murakami, T. Kato, N. Wada, H. Ishii, M. Obokata","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging based on resting assessments. Exercise echocardiography is often used to unmask abnormalities that develop during exercise, but the diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. This study aimed to elucidate how cardiologists utilize exercise echocardiography to diagnose HFpEF in real-world practice.\n \n \n \n An international web-based survey involving 87 cardiologists was performed. We also performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to investigate the impact of different exercise echocardiographic diagnostic criteria in 652 dyspneic patients who underwent exercise echocardiography. The HFA-PEFF algorithm was the most commonly used exercise echocardiography criterion for HFpEF diagnoses (48%), followed by the ASE/EACVI criteria (24%) and other combinations of multiple parameters (22%). Among 652 patients, the proportion of HFpEF diagnosis varied substantially according to the criteria used ranging from 20.1% (ASE/EACVI criteria) to 44.3% (HFA-PEFF algorithm). Many cases (49.4-70.5%) remained indeterminate after exercise echocardiography, but only 41% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise right heart catheterization to resolve an indeterminate result. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, 54% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise echocardiography results to initiate sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors.\n \n \n \n In real-world practice, exercise echocardiographic criteria utilized across cardiologists vary, which meaningfully impacts the frequency of HFpEF diagnoses, with indeterminate results being common. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, many cardiologists initiate pharmacotherapy based on exercise echocardiography. The lack of consensus on universal diagnostic criteria for exercise echocardiography and approaches to indeterminate results may limit the delivery of evidence-based treatment for HFpEF.\n","PeriodicalId":508944,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","volume":"73 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in Approach to Exercise Stress Echocardiography for Diagnosis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction -An International Survey on Real-World Practice\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Tani, Y. Reddy, Frederik H Verbrugge, Jeong Hoon Yang, Kazuaki Negishi, T. Harada, Kazuki Kagami, Yuki Saito, Naoki Yuasa, H. Sorimachi, Fumitaka Murakami, T. Kato, N. Wada, H. Ishii, M. Obokata\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging based on resting assessments. Exercise echocardiography is often used to unmask abnormalities that develop during exercise, but the diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. This study aimed to elucidate how cardiologists utilize exercise echocardiography to diagnose HFpEF in real-world practice.\\n \\n \\n \\n An international web-based survey involving 87 cardiologists was performed. We also performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to investigate the impact of different exercise echocardiographic diagnostic criteria in 652 dyspneic patients who underwent exercise echocardiography. The HFA-PEFF algorithm was the most commonly used exercise echocardiography criterion for HFpEF diagnoses (48%), followed by the ASE/EACVI criteria (24%) and other combinations of multiple parameters (22%). Among 652 patients, the proportion of HFpEF diagnosis varied substantially according to the criteria used ranging from 20.1% (ASE/EACVI criteria) to 44.3% (HFA-PEFF algorithm). Many cases (49.4-70.5%) remained indeterminate after exercise echocardiography, but only 41% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise right heart catheterization to resolve an indeterminate result. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, 54% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise echocardiography results to initiate sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors.\\n \\n \\n \\n In real-world practice, exercise echocardiographic criteria utilized across cardiologists vary, which meaningfully impacts the frequency of HFpEF diagnoses, with indeterminate results being common. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, many cardiologists initiate pharmacotherapy based on exercise echocardiography. The lack of consensus on universal diagnostic criteria for exercise echocardiography and approaches to indeterminate results may limit the delivery of evidence-based treatment for HFpEF.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据静息评估诊断射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)仍然具有挑战性。运动超声心动图通常用于揭示运动时出现的异常,但诊断标准尚未统一。本研究旨在阐明心脏病专家在实际工作中如何利用运动超声心动图诊断高房心率过缓。 我们对 87 名心脏病专家进行了国际网络调查。我们还对 652 名接受运动超声心动图检查的呼吸困难患者进行了回顾性横断面研究,以调查不同运动超声心动图诊断标准的影响。HFA-PEFF算法是最常用的HFpEF运动超声心动图诊断标准(48%),其次是ASE/EACVI标准(24%)和其他多种参数组合(22%)。在 652 名患者中,HFpEF 诊断比例因使用的标准不同而有很大差异,从 20.1%(ASE/EACVI 标准)到 44.3%(HFA-PEFF 算法)不等。许多病例(49.4%-70.5%)在运动超声心动图检查后仍不能确定,但只有 41% 的受访心脏病专家会使用运动右心导管检查来解决不确定的结果。尽管存在这些诊断不确定性,但仍有 54% 的受访心脏病专家会利用运动超声心动图结果启动钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂。 在实际临床实践中,不同心脏病专家使用的运动超声心动图标准各不相同,这对 HFpEF 诊断的频率产生了有意义的影响,不确定的结果很常见。尽管存在这些诊断不确定性,许多心脏病专家仍根据运动超声心动图启动药物治疗。对于运动超声心动图的通用诊断标准和处理不确定结果的方法缺乏共识,可能会限制对 HFpEF 进行循证治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability in Approach to Exercise Stress Echocardiography for Diagnosis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction -An International Survey on Real-World Practice
The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging based on resting assessments. Exercise echocardiography is often used to unmask abnormalities that develop during exercise, but the diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. This study aimed to elucidate how cardiologists utilize exercise echocardiography to diagnose HFpEF in real-world practice. An international web-based survey involving 87 cardiologists was performed. We also performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to investigate the impact of different exercise echocardiographic diagnostic criteria in 652 dyspneic patients who underwent exercise echocardiography. The HFA-PEFF algorithm was the most commonly used exercise echocardiography criterion for HFpEF diagnoses (48%), followed by the ASE/EACVI criteria (24%) and other combinations of multiple parameters (22%). Among 652 patients, the proportion of HFpEF diagnosis varied substantially according to the criteria used ranging from 20.1% (ASE/EACVI criteria) to 44.3% (HFA-PEFF algorithm). Many cases (49.4-70.5%) remained indeterminate after exercise echocardiography, but only 41% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise right heart catheterization to resolve an indeterminate result. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, 54% of surveyed cardiologists would utilize exercise echocardiography results to initiate sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. In real-world practice, exercise echocardiographic criteria utilized across cardiologists vary, which meaningfully impacts the frequency of HFpEF diagnoses, with indeterminate results being common. Despite these diagnostic uncertainties, many cardiologists initiate pharmacotherapy based on exercise echocardiography. The lack of consensus on universal diagnostic criteria for exercise echocardiography and approaches to indeterminate results may limit the delivery of evidence-based treatment for HFpEF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信