对执业医师能力受损、强制报告和临床医师自杀的恐惧:学生执业资格调查的亲身经历

Rosiel Elwyn
{"title":"对执业医师能力受损、强制报告和临床医师自杀的恐惧:学生执业资格调查的亲身经历","authors":"Rosiel Elwyn","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v43i3.8300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will explore the embedded culture of professional mental health stigma within the mental health professional workforce in Australia, and issues stemming from regulatory complaints processes (i.e., fitness to practice investigations) that translate into workplace stigma, placing mental health workers and student trainees at increased risk for fear and avoidance of help-seeking, isolation, burnout, and suicide. It will discuss the ethics of mandatory reporting of clinician impairment for mental health concerns, and how this compounds risk for vulnerable people, heightens masking of mental health concerns, leads to isolation, and barriers for help-seeking, and paradoxically, heightens risk to the public. The issues faced by clinicians and student trainees with Lived Experience of mental health concerns will be explored, including self-disclosure of Lived Experience of mental health concerns, diagnoses, and/or service-use in the workplace or tertiary settings; stigma and discrimination in health and mental health work and education settings and cultures of shame and ableism. Issues surrounding mandatory reporting for \"impairment\" and fitness-to-practice investigation, and the ethics and safety of mandatory reporting processes will also be explored. This article will use autoethnographic research methods of the author's own experience as a student subjected to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) fitness-to-practice investigation and vexatious complaint, to support the literature and fill in gaps, as real-world illustration of these issues. Finally, suggested adaptations to AHPRA's investigations program and the mandatory reporting process will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":55735,"journal":{"name":"Disability Studies Quarterly","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear of the Impaired Practitioner, Mandatory Reporting, and Clinician Suicide: A Lived Experience of Fitness to Practice Investigation as a Student\",\"authors\":\"Rosiel Elwyn\",\"doi\":\"10.18061/dsq.v43i3.8300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article will explore the embedded culture of professional mental health stigma within the mental health professional workforce in Australia, and issues stemming from regulatory complaints processes (i.e., fitness to practice investigations) that translate into workplace stigma, placing mental health workers and student trainees at increased risk for fear and avoidance of help-seeking, isolation, burnout, and suicide. It will discuss the ethics of mandatory reporting of clinician impairment for mental health concerns, and how this compounds risk for vulnerable people, heightens masking of mental health concerns, leads to isolation, and barriers for help-seeking, and paradoxically, heightens risk to the public. The issues faced by clinicians and student trainees with Lived Experience of mental health concerns will be explored, including self-disclosure of Lived Experience of mental health concerns, diagnoses, and/or service-use in the workplace or tertiary settings; stigma and discrimination in health and mental health work and education settings and cultures of shame and ableism. Issues surrounding mandatory reporting for \\\"impairment\\\" and fitness-to-practice investigation, and the ethics and safety of mandatory reporting processes will also be explored. This article will use autoethnographic research methods of the author's own experience as a student subjected to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) fitness-to-practice investigation and vexatious complaint, to support the literature and fill in gaps, as real-world illustration of these issues. Finally, suggested adaptations to AHPRA's investigations program and the mandatory reporting process will be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v43i3.8300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v43i3.8300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将探讨澳大利亚心理健康专业人员队伍中根深蒂固的专业心理健康污名文化,以及监管投诉程序(即执业资格调查)所产生的问题,这些问题转化为工作场所的污名,使心理健康工作者和受训学生面临更高的风险,如恐惧和逃避寻求帮助、孤立、倦怠和自杀。本报告将讨论强制报告临床医生精神健康受损情况的伦理问题,以及这种做法如何加剧了弱势人群的风险、加剧了对精神健康问题的掩盖、导致隔离和寻求帮助的障碍,以及自相矛盾地加剧了对公众的风险。我们将探讨具有心理健康问题生活经验的临床医生和受训学生所面临的问题,包括在工作场所或高等教育机构中自我披露心理健康问题、诊断和/或服务使用的生活经验;在健康和心理健康工作及教育环境中的耻辱感和歧视,以及耻辱文化和能力主义。此外,还将探讨与 "损伤 "强制报告和执业适宜性调查有关的问题,以及强制报告程序的道德和安全问题。本文将以作者作为一名学生接受澳大利亚卫生从业者监管局(AHPRA)执业适宜性调查和无理投诉的亲身经历,采用自述式研究方法来支持文献并填补空白,以现实世界来说明这些问题。最后,还将讨论对澳大利亚卫生从业者监管局的调查项目和强制报告程序进行调整的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fear of the Impaired Practitioner, Mandatory Reporting, and Clinician Suicide: A Lived Experience of Fitness to Practice Investigation as a Student
This article will explore the embedded culture of professional mental health stigma within the mental health professional workforce in Australia, and issues stemming from regulatory complaints processes (i.e., fitness to practice investigations) that translate into workplace stigma, placing mental health workers and student trainees at increased risk for fear and avoidance of help-seeking, isolation, burnout, and suicide. It will discuss the ethics of mandatory reporting of clinician impairment for mental health concerns, and how this compounds risk for vulnerable people, heightens masking of mental health concerns, leads to isolation, and barriers for help-seeking, and paradoxically, heightens risk to the public. The issues faced by clinicians and student trainees with Lived Experience of mental health concerns will be explored, including self-disclosure of Lived Experience of mental health concerns, diagnoses, and/or service-use in the workplace or tertiary settings; stigma and discrimination in health and mental health work and education settings and cultures of shame and ableism. Issues surrounding mandatory reporting for "impairment" and fitness-to-practice investigation, and the ethics and safety of mandatory reporting processes will also be explored. This article will use autoethnographic research methods of the author's own experience as a student subjected to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) fitness-to-practice investigation and vexatious complaint, to support the literature and fill in gaps, as real-world illustration of these issues. Finally, suggested adaptations to AHPRA's investigations program and the mandatory reporting process will be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信