Claudio M. Monteza-Moreno, Mark N. Grote, Jefferson S. Hall, Patrick A. Jansen
{"title":"作为地栖哺乳动物栖息地的热带木材种植园:巴拿马中部相机诱捕评估","authors":"Claudio M. Monteza-Moreno, Mark N. Grote, Jefferson S. Hall, Patrick A. Jansen","doi":"10.1111/btp.13352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reforestation projects in the tropics often consist of plantations, typically monocultures of non-native timber species. It has been questioned whether such plantations are suitable as wildlife habitat, but empirical evidence is scarce, especially on plantations embedded on highly disturbed landscapes. Here, we compare species richness and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals between five types of plantations within a single area in Central Panama, the narrowest tract of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor. We deployed camera traps at stratified random points and followed a hierarchical modeling approach to compare community composition and occupancy between plantation types. We found a total of 16 ground-dwelling mammals in the area, most of which were small-bodied and short-lived, and the majority of species' occupancy probabilities were below 0.5 at any given plantation. Teak (<i>Tectona grandis</i>) plantations, which covered the largest area in the study, had the lowest estimated richness and occupancy, with occupancy probabilities exceeding 0.5 for just three species. Conversely, plantations of the native <i>Pachira quinata</i> and the non-native <i>Gmelina arborea</i>, covering an area four and nineteen times smaller than Teak, respectively, had higher richness and occupancy. Occupancy values were intermediate in the <i>Acacia</i> and mixed plantation types. Our findings suggest that plantations embedded in lowland tropical landscapes have limited conservation value for large-bodied mammals, and are ecologically constrained habitats for small- and medium-sized mammals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.13352","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tropical timber plantations as habitat for ground-dwelling mammals: A camera-trapping assessment in Central Panama\",\"authors\":\"Claudio M. Monteza-Moreno, Mark N. Grote, Jefferson S. Hall, Patrick A. Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/btp.13352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Reforestation projects in the tropics often consist of plantations, typically monocultures of non-native timber species. It has been questioned whether such plantations are suitable as wildlife habitat, but empirical evidence is scarce, especially on plantations embedded on highly disturbed landscapes. Here, we compare species richness and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals between five types of plantations within a single area in Central Panama, the narrowest tract of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor. We deployed camera traps at stratified random points and followed a hierarchical modeling approach to compare community composition and occupancy between plantation types. We found a total of 16 ground-dwelling mammals in the area, most of which were small-bodied and short-lived, and the majority of species' occupancy probabilities were below 0.5 at any given plantation. Teak (<i>Tectona grandis</i>) plantations, which covered the largest area in the study, had the lowest estimated richness and occupancy, with occupancy probabilities exceeding 0.5 for just three species. Conversely, plantations of the native <i>Pachira quinata</i> and the non-native <i>Gmelina arborea</i>, covering an area four and nineteen times smaller than Teak, respectively, had higher richness and occupancy. Occupancy values were intermediate in the <i>Acacia</i> and mixed plantation types. Our findings suggest that plantations embedded in lowland tropical landscapes have limited conservation value for large-bodied mammals, and are ecologically constrained habitats for small- and medium-sized mammals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropica\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.13352\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13352\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tropical timber plantations as habitat for ground-dwelling mammals: A camera-trapping assessment in Central Panama
Reforestation projects in the tropics often consist of plantations, typically monocultures of non-native timber species. It has been questioned whether such plantations are suitable as wildlife habitat, but empirical evidence is scarce, especially on plantations embedded on highly disturbed landscapes. Here, we compare species richness and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals between five types of plantations within a single area in Central Panama, the narrowest tract of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor. We deployed camera traps at stratified random points and followed a hierarchical modeling approach to compare community composition and occupancy between plantation types. We found a total of 16 ground-dwelling mammals in the area, most of which were small-bodied and short-lived, and the majority of species' occupancy probabilities were below 0.5 at any given plantation. Teak (Tectona grandis) plantations, which covered the largest area in the study, had the lowest estimated richness and occupancy, with occupancy probabilities exceeding 0.5 for just three species. Conversely, plantations of the native Pachira quinata and the non-native Gmelina arborea, covering an area four and nineteen times smaller than Teak, respectively, had higher richness and occupancy. Occupancy values were intermediate in the Acacia and mixed plantation types. Our findings suggest that plantations embedded in lowland tropical landscapes have limited conservation value for large-bodied mammals, and are ecologically constrained habitats for small- and medium-sized mammals.
期刊介绍:
Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.