三大现代社会条件--高度生存安全、教育和城市化--真的会降低人们的宗教信仰吗?1989-2020 年全球分析

IF 2.3 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Louisa L. Roberts
{"title":"三大现代社会条件--高度生存安全、教育和城市化--真的会降低人们的宗教信仰吗?1989-2020 年全球分析","authors":"Louisa L. Roberts","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some versions of secularization theory propose that existential security, education, and urbanicity exert directly measurable negative effects on religiosity cross‐culturally. However, few studies have tested this using longitudinal data. Nor have researchers adequately examined how much the relationship between these modern social conditions (MSCs) and religiosity varies society‐to‐society. This study addresses these limitations in a series of new analyses, using 1989–2020 World/European Values Survey data from approximately 100 countries. Results suggest that the three MSCs do not exert independent, negative effects on religiosity in general, at least not in the short or medium term. Indeed, national‐average increases in these MSCs were not found to predict decreased religiosity. And, interestingly and unexpectedly, the direction of individual‐level relationships between each MSC and religiosity varied greatly between countries and world regions. These findings suggest scholars should probably look elsewhere to explain why average religiosity has decreased in some world locations over recent decades.","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do the Three Modern Social Conditions—High Existential Security, Education, and Urbanicity—Really Make People Less Religious? A Worldwide Analysis, 1989–2020\",\"authors\":\"Louisa L. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jssr.12932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some versions of secularization theory propose that existential security, education, and urbanicity exert directly measurable negative effects on religiosity cross‐culturally. However, few studies have tested this using longitudinal data. Nor have researchers adequately examined how much the relationship between these modern social conditions (MSCs) and religiosity varies society‐to‐society. This study addresses these limitations in a series of new analyses, using 1989–2020 World/European Values Survey data from approximately 100 countries. Results suggest that the three MSCs do not exert independent, negative effects on religiosity in general, at least not in the short or medium term. Indeed, national‐average increases in these MSCs were not found to predict decreased religiosity. And, interestingly and unexpectedly, the direction of individual‐level relationships between each MSC and religiosity varied greatly between countries and world regions. These findings suggest scholars should probably look elsewhere to explain why average religiosity has decreased in some world locations over recent decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12932\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12932","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些世俗化理论认为,存在安全感、教育和城市化会对跨文化的宗教信仰产生可直接测量的负面影响。然而,很少有研究使用纵向数据对这一观点进行检验。研究人员也没有充分考察这些现代社会条件(MSCs)与宗教信仰之间的关系在多大程度上因社会而异。本研究利用 1989-2020 年世界/欧洲价值观调查(World/European Values Survey)中来自约 100 个国家的数据进行了一系列新的分析,以解决这些局限性。结果表明,至少在短期或中期内,三种 MSCs 不会对宗教信仰普遍产生独立的负面影响。事实上,这些最低消费标准的全国平均增长并不能预测宗教信仰的下降。而且,有趣且出乎意料的是,在不同的国家和世界不同的地区,每项海洋生态系统指标与宗教信仰之间的个体层面关系的方向差异很大。这些发现表明,学者们或许应该从其他方面来解释为什么近几十年来世界上一些地方的平均宗教信仰下降了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do the Three Modern Social Conditions—High Existential Security, Education, and Urbanicity—Really Make People Less Religious? A Worldwide Analysis, 1989–2020
Some versions of secularization theory propose that existential security, education, and urbanicity exert directly measurable negative effects on religiosity cross‐culturally. However, few studies have tested this using longitudinal data. Nor have researchers adequately examined how much the relationship between these modern social conditions (MSCs) and religiosity varies society‐to‐society. This study addresses these limitations in a series of new analyses, using 1989–2020 World/European Values Survey data from approximately 100 countries. Results suggest that the three MSCs do not exert independent, negative effects on religiosity in general, at least not in the short or medium term. Indeed, national‐average increases in these MSCs were not found to predict decreased religiosity. And, interestingly and unexpectedly, the direction of individual‐level relationships between each MSC and religiosity varied greatly between countries and world regions. These findings suggest scholars should probably look elsewhere to explain why average religiosity has decreased in some world locations over recent decades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes articles, research notes, and book reviews on the social scientific study of religion. Published articles are representative of the best current theoretical and methodological treatments of religion. Substantive areas include both micro-level analysis of religious organizations, institutions, and social change. While many articles published in the journal are sociological, the journal also publishes the work of psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and economists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信