Hubungan Antara, Hasil Belajar, Matematika Dengan, Fisik Di, Sma Negri, Tangerang, Nita Risdianita
{"title":"丹棱 SMA Negri 6 的数学学习成果与物理学习成果之间的关系","authors":"Hubungan Antara, Hasil Belajar, Matematika Dengan, Fisik Di, Sma Negri, Tangerang, Nita Risdianita","doi":"10.55606/concept.v3i2.1290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine whether there is a relationship between mathematics learning outcomes and physics learning outcomes by taking the subject of exponent numbers in mathematics and the subject of temperature and heat in physics. This research was conducted on class X students at SMA Negeri 6 Tangerang in the second semester. The sample was taken at simple random (cluster sampling) by taking one class from nine existing classes with a total of 30 students. The method used is a survey method with correlation techniques. The independent variable in this research is the results of learning mathematics, while the dependent variable is the results of learning physics. Before the data is analyzed, the requirements test is first carried out, namely the normality test using the Lilliefors test and the regression significance test using analysis of variance (ANOVA). From the results of the normality test for the independent variable, it was obtained that L-count = 0,08770 < 0,161 = L-table, while for the dependent variable it was obtained that L-count = 0,1108 < 0,161 L-table, so it can be concluded that the two samples were normally distributed. The results of linear regression calculations are obtained The linearity test obtained F-count 1,067 < 2,45 = F-table so it can be concluded that the regression model is linear, meaning there is a linear relationship between the two variables. The regression significance test obtained F=count = 34,732 > 4,20 = F-table. This means that the regression model is significant. Hypothesis testing was carried out using product moment correlation analysis, then calculating the significance of the correlation using the student t-test. The results of the correlation coefficient calculation obtained r-count = 0,744 and the results of the t-student test calculation obtained t-count = 5,892, while the t-table value with a significance level of α=0,05 and degrees of freedom (dk) = 28 was 2,05. Because t-count = 5,892 < 2,05 = t-table means Ho is rejected. So the results of this research conclude that there is a relationship between mathematics learning outcomes and physics learning outcomes. The coefficient of determination (r2) was obtained at 0,554. This means that mathematics learning outcomes contribute 55,4% to physics learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":372808,"journal":{"name":"Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hubungan Antara Hasil Belajar Matematika Dengan Hasil Belajar Fisika Di SMA Negri 6 Tangerang\",\"authors\":\"Hubungan Antara, Hasil Belajar, Matematika Dengan, Fisik Di, Sma Negri, Tangerang, Nita Risdianita\",\"doi\":\"10.55606/concept.v3i2.1290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to determine whether there is a relationship between mathematics learning outcomes and physics learning outcomes by taking the subject of exponent numbers in mathematics and the subject of temperature and heat in physics. This research was conducted on class X students at SMA Negeri 6 Tangerang in the second semester. The sample was taken at simple random (cluster sampling) by taking one class from nine existing classes with a total of 30 students. The method used is a survey method with correlation techniques. The independent variable in this research is the results of learning mathematics, while the dependent variable is the results of learning physics. Before the data is analyzed, the requirements test is first carried out, namely the normality test using the Lilliefors test and the regression significance test using analysis of variance (ANOVA). From the results of the normality test for the independent variable, it was obtained that L-count = 0,08770 < 0,161 = L-table, while for the dependent variable it was obtained that L-count = 0,1108 < 0,161 L-table, so it can be concluded that the two samples were normally distributed. The results of linear regression calculations are obtained The linearity test obtained F-count 1,067 < 2,45 = F-table so it can be concluded that the regression model is linear, meaning there is a linear relationship between the two variables. The regression significance test obtained F=count = 34,732 > 4,20 = F-table. This means that the regression model is significant. Hypothesis testing was carried out using product moment correlation analysis, then calculating the significance of the correlation using the student t-test. The results of the correlation coefficient calculation obtained r-count = 0,744 and the results of the t-student test calculation obtained t-count = 5,892, while the t-table value with a significance level of α=0,05 and degrees of freedom (dk) = 28 was 2,05. Because t-count = 5,892 < 2,05 = t-table means Ho is rejected. So the results of this research conclude that there is a relationship between mathematics learning outcomes and physics learning outcomes. The coefficient of determination (r2) was obtained at 0,554. This means that mathematics learning outcomes contribute 55,4% to physics learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i2.1290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i2.1290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是通过数学中的指数和物理中的温度与热量来确定数学学习成果和物理学习成果之间是否存在关系。研究对象为丹莪第六中学(SMA Negeri 6 Tangerang)下学期十年级学生。样本是从现有的九个班级中抽取一个班,共 30 名学生,进行简单随机抽样(群组抽样)。采用的方法是相关技术调查法。本研究的自变量是数学学习成绩,因变量是物理学习成绩。在对数据进行分析之前,首先要进行必要的检验,即利用 Lilliefors 检验进行正态性检验和利用方差分析(ANOVA)进行回归显著性检验。从自变量的正态性检验结果来看,L-count = 0,08770 < 0,161 = L-table,而因变量的正态性检验结果为 L-count = 0,1108 < 0,161 L-table,因此可以得出两个样本呈正态分布的结论。线性回归计算结果 线性检验得出 F-count 1,067 < 2,45 = F-表,因此可以得出结论,回归模型是线性的,即两个变量之间存在线性关系。回归显著性检验得出 F=count = 34,732 > 4,20 = F 表。这意味着回归模型是显著的。使用乘积矩相关分析进行假设检验,然后使用学生 t 检验计算相关性的显著性。相关系数计算结果为 r-count = 0,744,学生 t 检验计算结果为 t-count = 5,892,而显著性水平 α=0,05 和自由度 (dk) = 28 的 t 表值为 2,05。由于 t 值 = 5,892 < 2,05 = t 表,Ho 被否定。因此,本研究结果得出结论,数学学习成绩与物理学习成绩之间存在关系。确定系数 (r2) 为 0,554。这意味着数学学习成果对物理学习成果的贡献率为 55.4%。
Hubungan Antara Hasil Belajar Matematika Dengan Hasil Belajar Fisika Di SMA Negri 6 Tangerang
This research aims to determine whether there is a relationship between mathematics learning outcomes and physics learning outcomes by taking the subject of exponent numbers in mathematics and the subject of temperature and heat in physics. This research was conducted on class X students at SMA Negeri 6 Tangerang in the second semester. The sample was taken at simple random (cluster sampling) by taking one class from nine existing classes with a total of 30 students. The method used is a survey method with correlation techniques. The independent variable in this research is the results of learning mathematics, while the dependent variable is the results of learning physics. Before the data is analyzed, the requirements test is first carried out, namely the normality test using the Lilliefors test and the regression significance test using analysis of variance (ANOVA). From the results of the normality test for the independent variable, it was obtained that L-count = 0,08770 < 0,161 = L-table, while for the dependent variable it was obtained that L-count = 0,1108 < 0,161 L-table, so it can be concluded that the two samples were normally distributed. The results of linear regression calculations are obtained The linearity test obtained F-count 1,067 < 2,45 = F-table so it can be concluded that the regression model is linear, meaning there is a linear relationship between the two variables. The regression significance test obtained F=count = 34,732 > 4,20 = F-table. This means that the regression model is significant. Hypothesis testing was carried out using product moment correlation analysis, then calculating the significance of the correlation using the student t-test. The results of the correlation coefficient calculation obtained r-count = 0,744 and the results of the t-student test calculation obtained t-count = 5,892, while the t-table value with a significance level of α=0,05 and degrees of freedom (dk) = 28 was 2,05. Because t-count = 5,892 < 2,05 = t-table means Ho is rejected. So the results of this research conclude that there is a relationship between mathematics learning outcomes and physics learning outcomes. The coefficient of determination (r2) was obtained at 0,554. This means that mathematics learning outcomes contribute 55,4% to physics learning outcomes.