虚弱评估工具及其在普外科术前评估中的预测价值:叙述性综述

Swizel Ann Cardoso, Jenisha Suyambu, Aamir Amin, Javed Iqbal, R. P. Cardoso, Ather Iqbal, Akarshak Bal, Natasha Varghese Isaac, Nahid Raufi
{"title":"虚弱评估工具及其在普外科术前评估中的预测价值:叙述性综述","authors":"Swizel Ann Cardoso, Jenisha Suyambu, Aamir Amin, Javed Iqbal, R. P. Cardoso, Ather Iqbal, Akarshak Bal, Natasha Varghese Isaac, Nahid Raufi","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world’s population is ageing rapidly, with projections suggesting a significant increase in the elderly demographic over the next few decades. This shift is likely to result in long periods of infirmity and frailty, thus escalating healthcare demands. Frailty has been investigated almost exclusively in the elderly because of its association with the senior population. It is considered to be an unavoidable aspect of old age, rather than a variable aspect of ageing. It has been linked to a greater risk of falls and decreased mobility, increased hospitalizations, institutionalization, and mortality. Due to elevated complication risk, the frail group required expert surgical treatment and specialised care. Various models have been described in recent years, including the Frailty Phenotype model, the Edmonton Frailty scale, and the Clinical Frailty scale, among many others. Each model employs several components to assess an individual’s frailty. There is, however, no gold standard for measuring fragility. The use of such assessment methods in pre-operative frailty screening as a risk-stratification instrument has been shown to be effective in older persons undergoing general surgery. The use of frailty assessment tools to determine the level of frailty together with evidence-based treatment and management should be supported by collaborative decision making. In this narrative review, we discussed the four commonly used frailty assessment tools with a particular emphasis on the need for additional research to refine these models and enhance their predictive accuracy in surgical settings.","PeriodicalId":373451,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","volume":"44 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty assessment tools and their predictive value in preoperative evaluation for general surgery: a narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Swizel Ann Cardoso, Jenisha Suyambu, Aamir Amin, Javed Iqbal, R. P. Cardoso, Ather Iqbal, Akarshak Bal, Natasha Varghese Isaac, Nahid Raufi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The world’s population is ageing rapidly, with projections suggesting a significant increase in the elderly demographic over the next few decades. This shift is likely to result in long periods of infirmity and frailty, thus escalating healthcare demands. Frailty has been investigated almost exclusively in the elderly because of its association with the senior population. It is considered to be an unavoidable aspect of old age, rather than a variable aspect of ageing. It has been linked to a greater risk of falls and decreased mobility, increased hospitalizations, institutionalization, and mortality. Due to elevated complication risk, the frail group required expert surgical treatment and specialised care. Various models have been described in recent years, including the Frailty Phenotype model, the Edmonton Frailty scale, and the Clinical Frailty scale, among many others. Each model employs several components to assess an individual’s frailty. There is, however, no gold standard for measuring fragility. The use of such assessment methods in pre-operative frailty screening as a risk-stratification instrument has been shown to be effective in older persons undergoing general surgery. The use of frailty assessment tools to determine the level of frailty together with evidence-based treatment and management should be supported by collaborative decision making. In this narrative review, we discussed the four commonly used frailty assessment tools with a particular emphasis on the need for additional research to refine these models and enhance their predictive accuracy in surgical settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界人口正在迅速老龄化,预计未来几十年老年人口将大幅增加。这种变化很可能导致长期体弱多病,从而使医疗保健需求增加。由于体弱与老年人口的关系,人们几乎只对老年人进行研究。它被认为是老年人不可避免的一个方面,而不是老龄化的一个可变方面。衰老与跌倒风险增加、活动能力下降、住院次数增加、入住养老院和死亡率上升有关。由于并发症风险升高,体弱人群需要专业的外科治疗和特殊护理。近年来,人们描述了各种模型,包括虚弱表型模型、埃德蒙顿虚弱量表和临床虚弱量表等。每种模型都采用多个组成部分来评估个体的虚弱程度。不过,目前还没有衡量虚弱程度的黄金标准。在接受普通外科手术的老年人中,使用这些评估方法作为风险分级工具进行术前虚弱筛查已被证明是有效的。使用虚弱程度评估工具来确定虚弱程度以及循证治疗和管理,应得到合作决策的支持。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们讨论了四种常用的虚弱程度评估工具,并特别强调需要开展更多研究来完善这些模型,提高它们在外科手术中的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frailty assessment tools and their predictive value in preoperative evaluation for general surgery: a narrative review
The world’s population is ageing rapidly, with projections suggesting a significant increase in the elderly demographic over the next few decades. This shift is likely to result in long periods of infirmity and frailty, thus escalating healthcare demands. Frailty has been investigated almost exclusively in the elderly because of its association with the senior population. It is considered to be an unavoidable aspect of old age, rather than a variable aspect of ageing. It has been linked to a greater risk of falls and decreased mobility, increased hospitalizations, institutionalization, and mortality. Due to elevated complication risk, the frail group required expert surgical treatment and specialised care. Various models have been described in recent years, including the Frailty Phenotype model, the Edmonton Frailty scale, and the Clinical Frailty scale, among many others. Each model employs several components to assess an individual’s frailty. There is, however, no gold standard for measuring fragility. The use of such assessment methods in pre-operative frailty screening as a risk-stratification instrument has been shown to be effective in older persons undergoing general surgery. The use of frailty assessment tools to determine the level of frailty together with evidence-based treatment and management should be supported by collaborative decision making. In this narrative review, we discussed the four commonly used frailty assessment tools with a particular emphasis on the need for additional research to refine these models and enhance their predictive accuracy in surgical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信