将教育系统分形自组织为双曲秩分布

R. V. Gurina, V. V. Lizyaeva
{"title":"将教育系统分形自组织为双曲秩分布","authors":"R. V. Gurina, V. V. Lizyaeva","doi":"10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Cenology is a new scientific field that arose more than forty years ago, studying cenoses of different nature (techno-, bio-, eco-, cosmo-, sociocenoses). At the same time, it was found out that the objects of cenoses self-organize into hyperbolic rank distributions (GRR) at all scale levels. Technogenic self-organization is described by B.I. Kudrin. Earlier it was reported about the self-organization of space objects (satellites of planets, planets, stars, star clusters, galaxies, clusters of galaxies) in exploration at all cosmic levels and the fractal nature of this process (R.V. Gurina). It was concluded that the deterministic nature of these processes: God does not play dice. Are similar processes taking place in the field of education? The purpose of this study was to find the answer to this question. Purpose setting. Generalization and analysis of the results of the study of hyperbolic rank distributions (GRR) of educational systems for the period 2002 – 2024; classification of GRR by scale levels. Methodology and methods of the study. Induction, deduction, analogy; graphical construction and approximation of GRP using computer programs; comparison of GRP by the Pearson method. Results. Examples from the graphical evidence base for this period are given: ratings of students, educational institutions of cities, countries. As it turned out, they are all classic hyperboles of varying steepness. In the process of analyzing the results, the synergetic fractal nature of educational objects organized into cenoses, like bio- and technocenoses, was revealed, which is the novelty and scientific value of the study. At the same time, fractality is an integral property of educational values, as well as of technocenoses. Unlike Mandelbrot fractals, the self – organization of objects in education, as well as in technology, is carried out at different hierarchical levels not according to a geometric, but according to a cenological type – in GRR. The considered set of educational facilities is distributed over five scale levels and forms a fractal megasystem, the model of which is presented in the form of a level scheme. Conclusion. The results obtained are a contribution to the theory and practice of cenology, a new scientific field, expanding its scope to the field of education; the Pareto 80/20 principle is a logical consequence of the law of GRR.","PeriodicalId":208354,"journal":{"name":"Professional education in the modern world","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractal self-organization of educational systems into hyperbolic rank distributions\",\"authors\":\"R. V. Gurina, V. V. Lizyaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Cenology is a new scientific field that arose more than forty years ago, studying cenoses of different nature (techno-, bio-, eco-, cosmo-, sociocenoses). At the same time, it was found out that the objects of cenoses self-organize into hyperbolic rank distributions (GRR) at all scale levels. Technogenic self-organization is described by B.I. Kudrin. Earlier it was reported about the self-organization of space objects (satellites of planets, planets, stars, star clusters, galaxies, clusters of galaxies) in exploration at all cosmic levels and the fractal nature of this process (R.V. Gurina). It was concluded that the deterministic nature of these processes: God does not play dice. Are similar processes taking place in the field of education? The purpose of this study was to find the answer to this question. Purpose setting. Generalization and analysis of the results of the study of hyperbolic rank distributions (GRR) of educational systems for the period 2002 – 2024; classification of GRR by scale levels. Methodology and methods of the study. Induction, deduction, analogy; graphical construction and approximation of GRP using computer programs; comparison of GRP by the Pearson method. Results. Examples from the graphical evidence base for this period are given: ratings of students, educational institutions of cities, countries. As it turned out, they are all classic hyperboles of varying steepness. In the process of analyzing the results, the synergetic fractal nature of educational objects organized into cenoses, like bio- and technocenoses, was revealed, which is the novelty and scientific value of the study. At the same time, fractality is an integral property of educational values, as well as of technocenoses. Unlike Mandelbrot fractals, the self – organization of objects in education, as well as in technology, is carried out at different hierarchical levels not according to a geometric, but according to a cenological type – in GRR. The considered set of educational facilities is distributed over five scale levels and forms a fractal megasystem, the model of which is presented in the form of a level scheme. Conclusion. The results obtained are a contribution to the theory and practice of cenology, a new scientific field, expanding its scope to the field of education; the Pareto 80/20 principle is a logical consequence of the law of GRR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional education in the modern world\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional education in the modern world\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional education in the modern world","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介生态学是四十多年前出现的一个新的科学领域,研究不同性质的生态(技术生态、生物生态、生态生态、宇宙生态、社会生态)。与此同时,人们还发现,生态系的对象在所有尺度水平上都会自组织成双曲秩分布(GRR)。B.I. 库德林对技术自组织进行了描述。早些时候有报告称,空间物体(行星卫星、行星、恒星、星团、星系、星系团)在所有宇宙级别的探索过程中都存在自组织现象,而且这一过程具有分形性质(R.V. Gurina)。结论是,这些过程具有确定性:上帝不会玩骰子。教育领域是否也有类似的过程?本研究的目的就是要找到这个问题的答案。目的设定。对 2002-2024 年期间教育系统双曲秩分布(GRR)的研究结果进行归纳和分析;按规模等级对 GRR 进行分类。研究方法。归纳、演绎、类比;使用计算机程序对双曲秩分布进行图形构建和近似;使用皮尔逊方法对双曲秩分布进行比较。结果。举例说明了这一时期的图表证据库:学生、城市教育机构、国家的评分。结果发现,它们都是典型的双曲线,陡度各不相同。在对结果进行分析的过程中,我们发现了教育对象的协同分形性质,这些教育对象被组织成一个个小圈子,如生物小圈子和技术小圈子,这就是这项研究的新颖性和科学价值所在。同时,分形既是教育价值的一个组成部分,也是技术领域的一个组成部分。与 Mandelbrot 分形不同,教育和技术领域的物体自组织不是根据几何图形,而是根据 GRR 中的分层类型在不同层次上进行的。所考虑的教育设施分布在五个等级上,形成了一个分形巨系统,其模型以等级方案的形式呈现。结论。所取得的成果是对生态学理论和实践的贡献,生态学是一个新的科学领域,其范围已 扩展到教育领域;帕累托 80/20 原则是 GRR 法则的逻辑结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fractal self-organization of educational systems into hyperbolic rank distributions
Introduction. Cenology is a new scientific field that arose more than forty years ago, studying cenoses of different nature (techno-, bio-, eco-, cosmo-, sociocenoses). At the same time, it was found out that the objects of cenoses self-organize into hyperbolic rank distributions (GRR) at all scale levels. Technogenic self-organization is described by B.I. Kudrin. Earlier it was reported about the self-organization of space objects (satellites of planets, planets, stars, star clusters, galaxies, clusters of galaxies) in exploration at all cosmic levels and the fractal nature of this process (R.V. Gurina). It was concluded that the deterministic nature of these processes: God does not play dice. Are similar processes taking place in the field of education? The purpose of this study was to find the answer to this question. Purpose setting. Generalization and analysis of the results of the study of hyperbolic rank distributions (GRR) of educational systems for the period 2002 – 2024; classification of GRR by scale levels. Methodology and methods of the study. Induction, deduction, analogy; graphical construction and approximation of GRP using computer programs; comparison of GRP by the Pearson method. Results. Examples from the graphical evidence base for this period are given: ratings of students, educational institutions of cities, countries. As it turned out, they are all classic hyperboles of varying steepness. In the process of analyzing the results, the synergetic fractal nature of educational objects organized into cenoses, like bio- and technocenoses, was revealed, which is the novelty and scientific value of the study. At the same time, fractality is an integral property of educational values, as well as of technocenoses. Unlike Mandelbrot fractals, the self – organization of objects in education, as well as in technology, is carried out at different hierarchical levels not according to a geometric, but according to a cenological type – in GRR. The considered set of educational facilities is distributed over five scale levels and forms a fractal megasystem, the model of which is presented in the form of a level scheme. Conclusion. The results obtained are a contribution to the theory and practice of cenology, a new scientific field, expanding its scope to the field of education; the Pareto 80/20 principle is a logical consequence of the law of GRR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信