{"title":"激励当地交易型能源市场中的同行:消费者、消费者和消费者管理者案例研究","authors":"Yaa S. A. Kwateng, Dawei Qiu, Goran Strbac","doi":"10.1049/stg2.12166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A decarbonised future grid should couple technological novelty with innovative market models to efficiently capture the value of grid-edge decarbonised assets. The transactive energy (TE) concept inverts the centralised grid model by leveraging the evolution of consumers to prosumers to prosumagers. The principal TE market design challenge is transactive control—using market and pricing mechanisms to coordinate autonomous peer interactions, to optimally allocate power and incentivise peers. Peer attraction, incentivisation and retention are all critical for practical TE implementation along three adoption stages, starting from independent peer transactions with the centralised market; to decentralised peer coordination; towards distributed peer-to-peer trading. Addressing gaps in related scholarship, the authors investigate the economic positions of distinct peer roles in each adoption stage and two local pricing strategies. Using a real market dataset, trading decisions are simulated over a 1-year horizon at hourly granularity. Coordinated action achieves better transactive control for the community, with economic superiority over centralised and distributed mechanisms. Distinct peer incentives should equitably align with their contribution to market functionality, such as the value ascribed to prosumagers' flexibility in local pricing and the constrained bargaining power of prosumers in distributed bilateral negotiations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36490,"journal":{"name":"IET Smart Grid","volume":"7 5","pages":"672-694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/stg2.12166","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incentivising peers in local transactive energy markets: A case study for consumers, prosumers and prosumagers\",\"authors\":\"Yaa S. A. Kwateng, Dawei Qiu, Goran Strbac\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/stg2.12166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A decarbonised future grid should couple technological novelty with innovative market models to efficiently capture the value of grid-edge decarbonised assets. The transactive energy (TE) concept inverts the centralised grid model by leveraging the evolution of consumers to prosumers to prosumagers. The principal TE market design challenge is transactive control—using market and pricing mechanisms to coordinate autonomous peer interactions, to optimally allocate power and incentivise peers. Peer attraction, incentivisation and retention are all critical for practical TE implementation along three adoption stages, starting from independent peer transactions with the centralised market; to decentralised peer coordination; towards distributed peer-to-peer trading. Addressing gaps in related scholarship, the authors investigate the economic positions of distinct peer roles in each adoption stage and two local pricing strategies. Using a real market dataset, trading decisions are simulated over a 1-year horizon at hourly granularity. Coordinated action achieves better transactive control for the community, with economic superiority over centralised and distributed mechanisms. Distinct peer incentives should equitably align with their contribution to market functionality, such as the value ascribed to prosumagers' flexibility in local pricing and the constrained bargaining power of prosumers in distributed bilateral negotiations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Smart Grid\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"672-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/stg2.12166\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Smart Grid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/stg2.12166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Smart Grid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/stg2.12166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
去碳化的未来电网应将技术创新与创新市场模式相结合,以有效获取电网边缘去碳化资产的价值。交互式能源(Transactive Energy,TE)概念通过利用消费者到专业消费者再到专业消费者的演变,颠覆了集中式电网模式。交易型能源(TE)市场设计的主要挑战是交易控制--利用市场和定价机制协调自主的同行互动,优化电力分配并激励同行。吸引、激励和留住同行对于按照三个采用阶段实际实施 TE 至关重要:从与集中式市场进行独立同行交易,到分散式同行协调,再到分布式同行交易。为了弥补相关研究的不足,作者研究了每个采用阶段中不同对等角色的经济地位以及两种本地定价策略。利用真实市场数据集,模拟了 1 年时间内每小时粒度的交易决策。协调行动为社区实现了更好的交易控制,其经济效益优于集中式和分布式机制。不同的同行激励措施应与其对市场功能的贡献公平地保持一致,例如,在本地定价中赋予原住民灵活性的价值,以及在分布式双边谈判中原住民受限的讨价还价能力。
Incentivising peers in local transactive energy markets: A case study for consumers, prosumers and prosumagers
A decarbonised future grid should couple technological novelty with innovative market models to efficiently capture the value of grid-edge decarbonised assets. The transactive energy (TE) concept inverts the centralised grid model by leveraging the evolution of consumers to prosumers to prosumagers. The principal TE market design challenge is transactive control—using market and pricing mechanisms to coordinate autonomous peer interactions, to optimally allocate power and incentivise peers. Peer attraction, incentivisation and retention are all critical for practical TE implementation along three adoption stages, starting from independent peer transactions with the centralised market; to decentralised peer coordination; towards distributed peer-to-peer trading. Addressing gaps in related scholarship, the authors investigate the economic positions of distinct peer roles in each adoption stage and two local pricing strategies. Using a real market dataset, trading decisions are simulated over a 1-year horizon at hourly granularity. Coordinated action achieves better transactive control for the community, with economic superiority over centralised and distributed mechanisms. Distinct peer incentives should equitably align with their contribution to market functionality, such as the value ascribed to prosumagers' flexibility in local pricing and the constrained bargaining power of prosumers in distributed bilateral negotiations.