作为社会哲学研究对象的教育目的

D. V. Rakhinsky, G. V. Panasenko, V. V. Mineev, S. P. Shtumpf, A. G. Mikhailichenko
{"title":"作为社会哲学研究对象的教育目的","authors":"D. V. Rakhinsky, G. V. Panasenko, V. V. Mineev, S. P. Shtumpf, A. G. Mikhailichenko","doi":"10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The research presented in the article is aimed at identifying the most significant aspects of the problems of educational aims. The existing ways of understanding the aims of education are considered, and conclusions are drawn regarding their distinctive features. The connection between the problems of the aim of education and other aspects of the philosophical reflection of education is shown – questions of the definition of education and criteria for assessing educational results. Purpose setting. The research sets the task of generalizing modern socio-philosophical ideas about the aim of education. The authors adhere to the position that the emergence, change, and functioning of educational aims are primarily determined by social factors. Methodology and methods of the study. In the course of the study, methods of substantive and comparative analysis of domestic and foreign literature devoted to the problems of educational aims were used. Results. Significant milestones in the development of understanding the problems of the aim of education in a socio-philosophical key are highlighted. The content of the normative approach to understanding the aim of education, developed by R.S. Peters, is considered, as well as the connection between his concept of the aim of education and the understanding of education as initiation. The innovations of the functionalist approach to understanding the aim of education are analyzed. The importance of distinguishing between the types of aims that appear in the educational context is shown. Some of the positions concerning the conditioning of educational aims by the influence of other social institutions – political, economic – are reproduced. Conclusion. The authors are inclined to the idea of the multidimensionality of the aim of education, its complexity. They emphasize the limitations of binary classifications of educational aims. The analysis carried out allows us to conclude that the question of the aim of education is one of the priorities for the socio-philosophical comprehension of educational reality.","PeriodicalId":208354,"journal":{"name":"Professional education in the modern world","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The aim of education as an object of socio-philosophical research\",\"authors\":\"D. V. Rakhinsky, G. V. Panasenko, V. V. Mineev, S. P. Shtumpf, A. G. Mikhailichenko\",\"doi\":\"10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The research presented in the article is aimed at identifying the most significant aspects of the problems of educational aims. The existing ways of understanding the aims of education are considered, and conclusions are drawn regarding their distinctive features. The connection between the problems of the aim of education and other aspects of the philosophical reflection of education is shown – questions of the definition of education and criteria for assessing educational results. Purpose setting. The research sets the task of generalizing modern socio-philosophical ideas about the aim of education. The authors adhere to the position that the emergence, change, and functioning of educational aims are primarily determined by social factors. Methodology and methods of the study. In the course of the study, methods of substantive and comparative analysis of domestic and foreign literature devoted to the problems of educational aims were used. Results. Significant milestones in the development of understanding the problems of the aim of education in a socio-philosophical key are highlighted. The content of the normative approach to understanding the aim of education, developed by R.S. Peters, is considered, as well as the connection between his concept of the aim of education and the understanding of education as initiation. The innovations of the functionalist approach to understanding the aim of education are analyzed. The importance of distinguishing between the types of aims that appear in the educational context is shown. Some of the positions concerning the conditioning of educational aims by the influence of other social institutions – political, economic – are reproduced. Conclusion. The authors are inclined to the idea of the multidimensionality of the aim of education, its complexity. They emphasize the limitations of binary classifications of educational aims. The analysis carried out allows us to conclude that the question of the aim of education is one of the priorities for the socio-philosophical comprehension of educational reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional education in the modern world\",\"volume\":\"9 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional education in the modern world\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional education in the modern world","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2024-2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。本文介绍的研究旨在确定教育目标问题的最重要方面。文章探讨了理解教育目的的现有方法,并就其独特之处得出结论。教育目的问题与教育哲学思考的其他方面--教育的定义问题和教育成果的评估标准--之间的联系也得到了体现。目的设定。研究的任务是归纳有关教育目的的现代社会哲学思想。作者坚持教育目的的产生、变化和运作主要由社会因素决定的立场。研究的方法和手段。在研究过程中,采用了对国内外有关教育目的问题的文献进行实质性分析和比较分析的方法。研究结果突出强调了从社会哲学角度理解教育目的问题的重要里程碑。考虑了 R.S. 彼得斯提出的理解教育目的的规范方法的内容,以及他的教育目的概念与将教育理解为启蒙教育之间的联系。分析了功能主义理解教育目的方法的创新之处。说明了区分教育背景下出现的各种目的的重要性。再现了关于教育目的受其他社会机构--政治、经济--影响的一些立场。结论。作者倾向于认为教育目的具有多面性和复杂性。他们强调了教育目标二元分类的局限性。通过分析,我们可以得出结论:教育目的问题是从社会哲学角度理解教育现实的优先事项之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The aim of education as an object of socio-philosophical research
Introduction. The research presented in the article is aimed at identifying the most significant aspects of the problems of educational aims. The existing ways of understanding the aims of education are considered, and conclusions are drawn regarding their distinctive features. The connection between the problems of the aim of education and other aspects of the philosophical reflection of education is shown – questions of the definition of education and criteria for assessing educational results. Purpose setting. The research sets the task of generalizing modern socio-philosophical ideas about the aim of education. The authors adhere to the position that the emergence, change, and functioning of educational aims are primarily determined by social factors. Methodology and methods of the study. In the course of the study, methods of substantive and comparative analysis of domestic and foreign literature devoted to the problems of educational aims were used. Results. Significant milestones in the development of understanding the problems of the aim of education in a socio-philosophical key are highlighted. The content of the normative approach to understanding the aim of education, developed by R.S. Peters, is considered, as well as the connection between his concept of the aim of education and the understanding of education as initiation. The innovations of the functionalist approach to understanding the aim of education are analyzed. The importance of distinguishing between the types of aims that appear in the educational context is shown. Some of the positions concerning the conditioning of educational aims by the influence of other social institutions – political, economic – are reproduced. Conclusion. The authors are inclined to the idea of the multidimensionality of the aim of education, its complexity. They emphasize the limitations of binary classifications of educational aims. The analysis carried out allows us to conclude that the question of the aim of education is one of the priorities for the socio-philosophical comprehension of educational reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信