聚合物屏蔽方法是降低野外作业放射性风险的实用解决方案

L. Rodrigues, Claudio Antonio Federico, Tercio Brum, Sergio Gavazza, Jéssica De Moutta Gomes, Edson Ramos de Andrade
{"title":"聚合物屏蔽方法是降低野外作业放射性风险的实用解决方案","authors":"L. Rodrigues, Claudio Antonio Federico, Tercio Brum, Sergio Gavazza, Jéssica De Moutta Gomes, Edson Ramos de Andrade","doi":"10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to evaluate various polymeric materials that have the potential to serve as substitutes or supplements to heavy vehicle structures for radiation-intensive environments. The materials under investigation include Nylon 6 (PA-6, C6H11NO), polyethylene (PE, C2H4), polypropylene (PP, C3H6), polyvinyl chloride (PVC, C2H3Cl), and polymethylacrylate (PMMA, C5H8O2). This study's primary aim is to determine each material's effectiveness in shielding against radiation and reducing exposure to vehicle occupants. As a new approach, this research examines the impact of utilizing polymeric materials and the potential health hazards for young drivers of both sexes, such as developing solid cancers from radiation exposure. According to the study, PVC was the most efficient polymer with a Transmission Factor (TF) of 0.44, leading to a 56% decrease in the relative risk estimate for the maximum thickness evaluated (20 cm). On the other hand, PP was identified as the least efficient, with a TF of 0.65, resulting in a 35% reduction in the relative risk estimate for the same thickness. The study concludes that each polymer has varying degrees of attenuation and that combining their properties is essential to achieving the desired level of risk reduction.","PeriodicalId":9203,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abordagens de blindagens baseadas em polímeros como uma solução prática na redução dos riscos radiológicos em operações de campo\",\"authors\":\"L. Rodrigues, Claudio Antonio Federico, Tercio Brum, Sergio Gavazza, Jéssica De Moutta Gomes, Edson Ramos de Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to evaluate various polymeric materials that have the potential to serve as substitutes or supplements to heavy vehicle structures for radiation-intensive environments. The materials under investigation include Nylon 6 (PA-6, C6H11NO), polyethylene (PE, C2H4), polypropylene (PP, C3H6), polyvinyl chloride (PVC, C2H3Cl), and polymethylacrylate (PMMA, C5H8O2). This study's primary aim is to determine each material's effectiveness in shielding against radiation and reducing exposure to vehicle occupants. As a new approach, this research examines the impact of utilizing polymeric materials and the potential health hazards for young drivers of both sexes, such as developing solid cancers from radiation exposure. According to the study, PVC was the most efficient polymer with a Transmission Factor (TF) of 0.44, leading to a 56% decrease in the relative risk estimate for the maximum thickness evaluated (20 cm). On the other hand, PP was identified as the least efficient, with a TF of 0.65, resulting in a 35% reduction in the relative risk estimate for the same thickness. The study concludes that each polymer has varying degrees of attenuation and that combining their properties is essential to achieving the desired level of risk reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是评估有可能作为辐射密集型环境下重型车辆结构的替代品或补充品的各种聚合物材料。调查的材料包括尼龙 6(PA-6,C6H11NO)、聚乙烯(PE,C2H4)、聚丙烯(PP,C3H6)、聚氯乙烯(PVC,C2H3Cl)和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA,C5H8O2)。这项研究的主要目的是确定每种材料在屏蔽辐射和减少车内人员暴露方面的有效性。作为一种新方法,这项研究探讨了使用聚合材料的影响以及对男女青年驾驶员的潜在健康危害,例如因暴露于辐射而患上实体癌。研究结果表明,聚氯乙烯是最有效的聚合物,其透射系数(TF)为 0.44,在评估的最大厚度(20 厘米)下,相对风险估计值降低了 56%。另一方面,聚丙烯被认为是效率最低的聚合物,其传输系数为 0.65,在相同厚度的情况下,相对风险估计值降低了 35%。研究得出结论,每种聚合物都有不同程度的衰减,要想达到理想的风险降低水平,必须将它们的特性结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abordagens de blindagens baseadas em polímeros como uma solução prática na redução dos riscos radiológicos em operações de campo
The objective of this research is to evaluate various polymeric materials that have the potential to serve as substitutes or supplements to heavy vehicle structures for radiation-intensive environments. The materials under investigation include Nylon 6 (PA-6, C6H11NO), polyethylene (PE, C2H4), polypropylene (PP, C3H6), polyvinyl chloride (PVC, C2H3Cl), and polymethylacrylate (PMMA, C5H8O2). This study's primary aim is to determine each material's effectiveness in shielding against radiation and reducing exposure to vehicle occupants. As a new approach, this research examines the impact of utilizing polymeric materials and the potential health hazards for young drivers of both sexes, such as developing solid cancers from radiation exposure. According to the study, PVC was the most efficient polymer with a Transmission Factor (TF) of 0.44, leading to a 56% decrease in the relative risk estimate for the maximum thickness evaluated (20 cm). On the other hand, PP was identified as the least efficient, with a TF of 0.65, resulting in a 35% reduction in the relative risk estimate for the same thickness. The study concludes that each polymer has varying degrees of attenuation and that combining their properties is essential to achieving the desired level of risk reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信