{"title":"利用基于人工智能的机器学习计算盲肠活检中的嗜酸性粒细胞数量","authors":"Harsh C. Shah, Anjali D. Amarapurkar","doi":"10.1002/med4.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Tissue eosinophilia is a diagnostically challenging entity. An accurate diagnosis can benefit the patient with appropriate treatment. Histopathology is the gold standard. Manual counting results in errors and is time consuming. Artificial intelligence (AI) acts like a human brain in terms of memory and reproducibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to determine the eosinophil count in gastrointestinal biopsies using AI and compare it with the manual method. A total of 400 digital images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of gastrointestinal biopsies were included in the study. Annotations were performed on images containing eosinophils. The neural network prepared using the Python language was a modified U-Net architecture containing five down blocks and five up blocks. The results obtained using the AI model were compared with manual counts. Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement were used for statistical analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a strong positive correlation between AI and manual eosinophil (0.8), which suggests a very strong correlation. The Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement was 0.85, which corresponds to excellent agreement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The manual eosinophil count and AI predictions demonstrated a very strong positive correlation. It is necessary to count eosinophils using an AI model because it saves time, and eliminates interobserver variability and human error.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.64","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eosinophil count in cecal biopsies using artificial intelligence-based machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Harsh C. Shah, Anjali D. Amarapurkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/med4.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Tissue eosinophilia is a diagnostically challenging entity. An accurate diagnosis can benefit the patient with appropriate treatment. Histopathology is the gold standard. Manual counting results in errors and is time consuming. Artificial intelligence (AI) acts like a human brain in terms of memory and reproducibility.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to determine the eosinophil count in gastrointestinal biopsies using AI and compare it with the manual method. A total of 400 digital images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of gastrointestinal biopsies were included in the study. Annotations were performed on images containing eosinophils. The neural network prepared using the Python language was a modified U-Net architecture containing five down blocks and five up blocks. The results obtained using the AI model were compared with manual counts. Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement were used for statistical analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a strong positive correlation between AI and manual eosinophil (0.8), which suggests a very strong correlation. The Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement was 0.85, which corresponds to excellent agreement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The manual eosinophil count and AI predictions demonstrated a very strong positive correlation. It is necessary to count eosinophils using an AI model because it saves time, and eliminates interobserver variability and human error.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.64\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多症在诊断上具有挑战性。准确的诊断可以让患者受益于适当的治疗。组织病理学是金标准。人工计数会导致误差,而且耗时。本研究的目的是利用人工智能确定胃肠道活检组织中的嗜酸性粒细胞数量,并将其与人工方法进行比较。研究共纳入了 400 张苏木精和伊红染色的胃肠道活检切片数字图像。对含有嗜酸性粒细胞的图像进行了注释。使用 Python 语言编制的神经网络是一个改进的 U-Net 架构,包含五个向下块和五个向上块。使用人工智能模型得出的结果与人工计数进行了比较。皮尔逊相关系数和科恩卡帕一致系数被用于统计分析。皮尔逊相关系数显示人工智能与人工计数嗜酸性粒细胞之间存在很强的正相关性(0.8),这表明两者之间存在很强的相关性。人工嗜酸性粒细胞计数与 AI 预测值呈很强的正相关。使用人工智能模型对嗜酸性粒细胞进行计数很有必要,因为它可以节省时间,消除观察者之间的差异和人为错误。
Eosinophil count in cecal biopsies using artificial intelligence-based machine learning
Background
Tissue eosinophilia is a diagnostically challenging entity. An accurate diagnosis can benefit the patient with appropriate treatment. Histopathology is the gold standard. Manual counting results in errors and is time consuming. Artificial intelligence (AI) acts like a human brain in terms of memory and reproducibility.
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the eosinophil count in gastrointestinal biopsies using AI and compare it with the manual method. A total of 400 digital images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of gastrointestinal biopsies were included in the study. Annotations were performed on images containing eosinophils. The neural network prepared using the Python language was a modified U-Net architecture containing five down blocks and five up blocks. The results obtained using the AI model were compared with manual counts. Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement were used for statistical analysis.
Results
Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a strong positive correlation between AI and manual eosinophil (0.8), which suggests a very strong correlation. The Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement was 0.85, which corresponds to excellent agreement.
Conclusions
The manual eosinophil count and AI predictions demonstrated a very strong positive correlation. It is necessary to count eosinophils using an AI model because it saves time, and eliminates interobserver variability and human error.