{"title":"探索非正规 STEM 教育计划背景下 STEM 学生的创业自我效能感","authors":"Pengzhi Chu, Zhujun Jiang, Xiongziyan Xiao, Xiaoni Liang, Jie Chen, Feng-Kuang Chiang","doi":"10.1007/s11165-024-10178-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A research model based on the presage–process–product theoretical framework was constructed to explore the relationship between STEM learning self-efficacy, perception of challenging learning environments, goal orientation (learning goal orientation and performance goal orientation), and entrepreneurial self-efficacy in students. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of 110 STEM students who participated in a university–enterprise collaboration informal STEM education programme. The results, analyzed using partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), indicated that both STEM learning self-efficacy and the perception of a challenging learning environment significantly positively affected learning and performance goal orientations. Furthermore, STEM learning self-efficacy had a direct positive effect on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Importantly, learning goal orientation was found to mediate the relationship between the perception of a challenging learning environment and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. These findings highlight the critical role of targeted educational environments and goal-setting orientations in fostering entrepreneurial self-efficacy in STEM students, providing valuable insights for educators and policymakers in higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy of STEM Students within the Context of an Informal STEM Education Programme\",\"authors\":\"Pengzhi Chu, Zhujun Jiang, Xiongziyan Xiao, Xiaoni Liang, Jie Chen, Feng-Kuang Chiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11165-024-10178-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A research model based on the presage–process–product theoretical framework was constructed to explore the relationship between STEM learning self-efficacy, perception of challenging learning environments, goal orientation (learning goal orientation and performance goal orientation), and entrepreneurial self-efficacy in students. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of 110 STEM students who participated in a university–enterprise collaboration informal STEM education programme. The results, analyzed using partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), indicated that both STEM learning self-efficacy and the perception of a challenging learning environment significantly positively affected learning and performance goal orientations. Furthermore, STEM learning self-efficacy had a direct positive effect on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Importantly, learning goal orientation was found to mediate the relationship between the perception of a challenging learning environment and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. These findings highlight the critical role of targeted educational environments and goal-setting orientations in fostering entrepreneurial self-efficacy in STEM students, providing valuable insights for educators and policymakers in higher education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10178-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10178-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy of STEM Students within the Context of an Informal STEM Education Programme
A research model based on the presage–process–product theoretical framework was constructed to explore the relationship between STEM learning self-efficacy, perception of challenging learning environments, goal orientation (learning goal orientation and performance goal orientation), and entrepreneurial self-efficacy in students. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of 110 STEM students who participated in a university–enterprise collaboration informal STEM education programme. The results, analyzed using partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), indicated that both STEM learning self-efficacy and the perception of a challenging learning environment significantly positively affected learning and performance goal orientations. Furthermore, STEM learning self-efficacy had a direct positive effect on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Importantly, learning goal orientation was found to mediate the relationship between the perception of a challenging learning environment and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. These findings highlight the critical role of targeted educational environments and goal-setting orientations in fostering entrepreneurial self-efficacy in STEM students, providing valuable insights for educators and policymakers in higher education.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.