利用一阶高斯-马尔科夫过程处理 GRACE 重力场模型的改进参数过滤方法

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Lin Zhang, Yunzhong Shen, Qiujie Chen, Kunpu Ji
{"title":"利用一阶高斯-马尔科夫过程处理 GRACE 重力场模型的改进参数过滤方法","authors":"Lin Zhang, Yunzhong Shen, Qiujie Chen, Kunpu Ji","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01871-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Removing stripe noise from the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) monthly gravity field model is crucial for accurately interpreting temporal gravity variations. The conventional parameter filtering (CPF) approach expresses the signal components with a harmonic model while neglecting non-periodic and interannual signals. To address this issue, we improve the CPF approach by incorporating those ignored signals using a first-order Gauss–Markov process. The improved parameter filtering (IPF) approach is used to filter the monthly spherical harmonic coefficients (SHCs) of the Tongji-Grace2018 model from April 2002 to December 2016. Compared to the CPF approach, the IPF approach exhibits stronger signals in low-degree SHCs (i.e., degrees below 20) and lower noise in high-order SHCs (i.e., orders above 40), alongside higher signal-to-noise ratios and better agreement with CSR mascon product and NOAH model in global and basin analysis. Across the 22 largest basins worldwide, the average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients of latitude-weighted terrestrial water storage anomalies filtered by the IPF approach relative to those derived from CSR mascon product and NOAH model are 0.90 and 0.21, significantly higher than 0.17 and − 0.71, filtered by the CPF approach. Simulation experiments further demonstrate that the IPF approach yields the filtered results closest to the actual signals, reducing root-mean-square errors by 30.1%, 25.9%, 45.3%, 30.9%, 46.6%, 32.7%, 39.6%, and 38.2% over land, and 2.8%, 54.4%, 70.1%, 15.3%, 69.2%, 46.5%, 40.4%, and 23.6% over the ocean, compared to CPF, DDK3, least square, RMS, Gaussian 300, Fan 300, Gaussian 300 with P4M6, and Fan 300 with P4M6 filtering approaches, respectively</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved parameter filtering approach for processing GRACE gravity field models using first-order Gauss–Markov process\",\"authors\":\"Lin Zhang, Yunzhong Shen, Qiujie Chen, Kunpu Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-024-01871-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Removing stripe noise from the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) monthly gravity field model is crucial for accurately interpreting temporal gravity variations. The conventional parameter filtering (CPF) approach expresses the signal components with a harmonic model while neglecting non-periodic and interannual signals. To address this issue, we improve the CPF approach by incorporating those ignored signals using a first-order Gauss–Markov process. The improved parameter filtering (IPF) approach is used to filter the monthly spherical harmonic coefficients (SHCs) of the Tongji-Grace2018 model from April 2002 to December 2016. Compared to the CPF approach, the IPF approach exhibits stronger signals in low-degree SHCs (i.e., degrees below 20) and lower noise in high-order SHCs (i.e., orders above 40), alongside higher signal-to-noise ratios and better agreement with CSR mascon product and NOAH model in global and basin analysis. Across the 22 largest basins worldwide, the average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients of latitude-weighted terrestrial water storage anomalies filtered by the IPF approach relative to those derived from CSR mascon product and NOAH model are 0.90 and 0.21, significantly higher than 0.17 and − 0.71, filtered by the CPF approach. Simulation experiments further demonstrate that the IPF approach yields the filtered results closest to the actual signals, reducing root-mean-square errors by 30.1%, 25.9%, 45.3%, 30.9%, 46.6%, 32.7%, 39.6%, and 38.2% over land, and 2.8%, 54.4%, 70.1%, 15.3%, 69.2%, 46.5%, 40.4%, and 23.6% over the ocean, compared to CPF, DDK3, least square, RMS, Gaussian 300, Fan 300, Gaussian 300 with P4M6, and Fan 300 with P4M6 filtering approaches, respectively</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01871-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01871-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

去除 GRACE(重力恢复和气候实验)月重力场模型中的条纹噪声对于准确解释时间重力变化至关重要。传统的参数滤波(CPF)方法用谐波模型表示信号成分,忽略了非周期性和年际信号。为解决这一问题,我们改进了 CPF 方法,利用一阶高斯-马尔科夫过程将这些被忽略的信号纳入其中。改进参数滤波(IPF)方法用于滤波同济-格雷斯 2018 模型 2002 年 4 月至 2016 年 12 月的月球谐波系数(SHC)。与 CPF 方法相比,IPF 方法在全球和流域分析中,低阶 SHC(即 20 阶以下)信号更强,高阶 SHC(即 40 阶以上)噪声更低,信噪比更高,与 CSR mascon 产品和 NOAH 模型的一致性更好。在全球 22 个最大的盆地中,相对于 CSR mascon 产品和 NOAH 模式得出的结果,IPF 方法筛选出的纬度加权陆地蓄水异常的平均纳什-苏特克利夫系数分别为 0.90 和 0.21,明显高于 CPF 方法筛选出的 0.17 和 -0.71。模拟实验进一步证明,IPF 方法得到的滤波结果最接近实际信号,均方根误差分别降低了 30.1%、25.9%、45.3%、30.9%、46.6%、32.7%、39.6% 和 38.2%。与 CPF、DDK3、最小平方、RMS、高斯 300、扇形 300、带 P4M6 的高斯 300 和带 P4M6 的扇形 300 滤波方法相比,在陆地上分别减少了 2.8%、54.4%、70.1%、15.3%、69.2%、46.5%、40.4% 和 23.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An improved parameter filtering approach for processing GRACE gravity field models using first-order Gauss–Markov process

An improved parameter filtering approach for processing GRACE gravity field models using first-order Gauss–Markov process

Removing stripe noise from the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) monthly gravity field model is crucial for accurately interpreting temporal gravity variations. The conventional parameter filtering (CPF) approach expresses the signal components with a harmonic model while neglecting non-periodic and interannual signals. To address this issue, we improve the CPF approach by incorporating those ignored signals using a first-order Gauss–Markov process. The improved parameter filtering (IPF) approach is used to filter the monthly spherical harmonic coefficients (SHCs) of the Tongji-Grace2018 model from April 2002 to December 2016. Compared to the CPF approach, the IPF approach exhibits stronger signals in low-degree SHCs (i.e., degrees below 20) and lower noise in high-order SHCs (i.e., orders above 40), alongside higher signal-to-noise ratios and better agreement with CSR mascon product and NOAH model in global and basin analysis. Across the 22 largest basins worldwide, the average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients of latitude-weighted terrestrial water storage anomalies filtered by the IPF approach relative to those derived from CSR mascon product and NOAH model are 0.90 and 0.21, significantly higher than 0.17 and − 0.71, filtered by the CPF approach. Simulation experiments further demonstrate that the IPF approach yields the filtered results closest to the actual signals, reducing root-mean-square errors by 30.1%, 25.9%, 45.3%, 30.9%, 46.6%, 32.7%, 39.6%, and 38.2% over land, and 2.8%, 54.4%, 70.1%, 15.3%, 69.2%, 46.5%, 40.4%, and 23.6% over the ocean, compared to CPF, DDK3, least square, RMS, Gaussian 300, Fan 300, Gaussian 300 with P4M6, and Fan 300 with P4M6 filtering approaches, respectively

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信