{"title":"根据口腔舌鳞状细胞癌的 T 状态确定粘膜和深缘距离对预后的影响: 一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Valentine Poissonnet MD, Bertille Segier MSc, Raphaël Lopez MD, PhD, Aurore Siegfried MD, Agnès Dupret-Bories MD, PhD, Jérôme Sarini MD, Vinciane Poulet MD, Franck Delanoë MD, Sébastien Vergez MD, PhD, Emilien Chabrillac MD","doi":"10.1002/hed.27844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To elucidate the prognostic implications of mucosal and deep margin distances in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), and to assess a different margin cut-off value in T1-T2 versus T3-T4 tumors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center retrospective study included 223 patients who received surgery for a primary OTSCC between January 2017 and December 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Multivariable analysis showed that deep margin distance ≥3 mm in T1-T2 tumors and ≥5 mm in T3-T4 tumors was significantly associated with better RFS and OS. Mucosal and deep margin distances were globally clinically useful for 2-year RFS prediction of T1-T2 tumors, for which deep margins seemed to have more clinical utility than mucosal margins. The influence of margin distances on 2-year RFS seemed greater for T1-T2 tumors than T3-T4 tumors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Mucosal and deep margin distances were associated with OS and RFS in OTSCC. Shorter deep margin distances may be aimed for in T1-T2 versus T3-T4 tumors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":"46 12","pages":"2926-2934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic implications of mucosal and deep margin distances according to T-status in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Valentine Poissonnet MD, Bertille Segier MSc, Raphaël Lopez MD, PhD, Aurore Siegfried MD, Agnès Dupret-Bories MD, PhD, Jérôme Sarini MD, Vinciane Poulet MD, Franck Delanoë MD, Sébastien Vergez MD, PhD, Emilien Chabrillac MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.27844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To elucidate the prognostic implications of mucosal and deep margin distances in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), and to assess a different margin cut-off value in T1-T2 versus T3-T4 tumors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This single-center retrospective study included 223 patients who received surgery for a primary OTSCC between January 2017 and December 2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multivariable analysis showed that deep margin distance ≥3 mm in T1-T2 tumors and ≥5 mm in T3-T4 tumors was significantly associated with better RFS and OS. Mucosal and deep margin distances were globally clinically useful for 2-year RFS prediction of T1-T2 tumors, for which deep margins seemed to have more clinical utility than mucosal margins. The influence of margin distances on 2-year RFS seemed greater for T1-T2 tumors than T3-T4 tumors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mucosal and deep margin distances were associated with OS and RFS in OTSCC. Shorter deep margin distances may be aimed for in T1-T2 versus T3-T4 tumors.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"volume\":\"46 12\",\"pages\":\"2926-2934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.27844\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.27844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic implications of mucosal and deep margin distances according to T-status in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study
Objective
To elucidate the prognostic implications of mucosal and deep margin distances in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), and to assess a different margin cut-off value in T1-T2 versus T3-T4 tumors.
Methods
This single-center retrospective study included 223 patients who received surgery for a primary OTSCC between January 2017 and December 2021.
Results
Multivariable analysis showed that deep margin distance ≥3 mm in T1-T2 tumors and ≥5 mm in T3-T4 tumors was significantly associated with better RFS and OS. Mucosal and deep margin distances were globally clinically useful for 2-year RFS prediction of T1-T2 tumors, for which deep margins seemed to have more clinical utility than mucosal margins. The influence of margin distances on 2-year RFS seemed greater for T1-T2 tumors than T3-T4 tumors.
Conclusion
Mucosal and deep margin distances were associated with OS and RFS in OTSCC. Shorter deep margin distances may be aimed for in T1-T2 versus T3-T4 tumors.
期刊介绍:
Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.