与外科教科书相比,使用动画白板视频提高医科学生的学习效率。

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Markus Koch, Simone A Günster, Anna Widder, Florian Seyfried, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Joy Backhaus, Sarah König, Johan F Lock
{"title":"与外科教科书相比,使用动画白板视频提高医科学生的学习效率。","authors":"Markus Koch, Simone A Günster, Anna Widder, Florian Seyfried, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Joy Backhaus, Sarah König, Johan F Lock","doi":"10.1177/23821205241262684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Animated videos have become popular in teaching medical students, although there is a certain lack of evidence concerning its efficacy. Surgery seems to be an ideal field for its application, since animations are very helpful to understand anatomic structures and complex procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of animated videos compared to textbooks on learning gain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective 2-arm cohort study with 5th-year medical students was conducted during their 2-week surgical training module. The initial cohort of students received textbook sections on 3 major topics in visceral surgery as learning medium (text cohort). During the following semester, the second cohort of students received 3 animated whiteboard videos (animated videos) containing equivalent content (video cohort). All participants completed a multiple-choice test consisting of 15 questions on the learning content at baseline (pre-test) and after the learning period (post-test) and answered an additional evaluation questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both cohorts were similar in their descriptive data and demonstrated significant learning gain during the 2-week learning period. The video cohort achieved better results (80% vs 73% correct answers; <i>P</i> = .028) and a higher learning gain (17% vs 11%; <i>P</i> = .034) in the post-test compared to the text cohort. The estimated learning time was longer in the video cohort (62 min vs 37 min; <i>P</i> < .001) and watching the videos resulted in higher learning gain (21% vs 6%; <i>P</i> < .001). Subgroups with higher learning gain by video learning were female gender (20% vs 11%; <i>P</i> = .040), native German speakers (18% vs 11%; <i>P</i> = .009), students without prior surgical experience (19% vs 12%; <i>P</i> = .033) and those undecided concerning a surgical career (22% vs 9%; <i>P</i> = .020). Interestingly, \"low digital orientation\" students benefited from videos (22% vs 13%; <i>P</i> = .021), whereas \"high digital orientation\" students did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Animated videos increase medical students' learning gain and interest in surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241262684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Learning Gain in Medical Students by Using Animated Whiteboard-Videos in Comparison to Textbooks in Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Koch, Simone A Günster, Anna Widder, Florian Seyfried, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Joy Backhaus, Sarah König, Johan F Lock\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205241262684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Animated videos have become popular in teaching medical students, although there is a certain lack of evidence concerning its efficacy. Surgery seems to be an ideal field for its application, since animations are very helpful to understand anatomic structures and complex procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of animated videos compared to textbooks on learning gain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective 2-arm cohort study with 5th-year medical students was conducted during their 2-week surgical training module. The initial cohort of students received textbook sections on 3 major topics in visceral surgery as learning medium (text cohort). During the following semester, the second cohort of students received 3 animated whiteboard videos (animated videos) containing equivalent content (video cohort). All participants completed a multiple-choice test consisting of 15 questions on the learning content at baseline (pre-test) and after the learning period (post-test) and answered an additional evaluation questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both cohorts were similar in their descriptive data and demonstrated significant learning gain during the 2-week learning period. The video cohort achieved better results (80% vs 73% correct answers; <i>P</i> = .028) and a higher learning gain (17% vs 11%; <i>P</i> = .034) in the post-test compared to the text cohort. The estimated learning time was longer in the video cohort (62 min vs 37 min; <i>P</i> < .001) and watching the videos resulted in higher learning gain (21% vs 6%; <i>P</i> < .001). Subgroups with higher learning gain by video learning were female gender (20% vs 11%; <i>P</i> = .040), native German speakers (18% vs 11%; <i>P</i> = .009), students without prior surgical experience (19% vs 12%; <i>P</i> = .033) and those undecided concerning a surgical career (22% vs 9%; <i>P</i> = .020). Interestingly, \\\"low digital orientation\\\" students benefited from videos (22% vs 13%; <i>P</i> = .021), whereas \\\"high digital orientation\\\" students did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Animated videos increase medical students' learning gain and interest in surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23821205241262684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241262684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241262684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:动画视频在医科学生的教学中很受欢迎,尽管有关其效果的证据还很缺乏。外科似乎是应用动画视频的理想领域,因为动画视频非常有助于理解解剖结构和复杂的手术过程。本研究旨在调查动画视频与教科书相比对学习效果的影响:方法:在为期两周的外科培训模块中,对五年级医学生进行了一项前瞻性双臂队列研究。第一批学生以内脏外科 3 个主要课题的教科书为学习媒介(教科书队列)。在接下来的学期中,第二批学生收到了 3 个动画白板视频(动画视频),内容相当(视频组)。所有学员在基线期(前测)和学习期结束后(后测)都完成了由 15 道关于学习内容的选择题组成的测试,并回答了附加的评估问卷:两组学员的描述性数据相似,在为期两周的学习期间都取得了显著的学习成绩。与文字组相比,视频组取得了更好的成绩(80% vs 73% 正确答案;P = .028),在后测试中取得了更高的学习收获(17% vs 11%;P = .034)。视频组学生(62 分钟 vs 37 分钟;P = .040)、德语为母语的学生(18% vs 11%;P = .009)、没有外科手术经验的学生(19% vs 12%;P = .033)和尚未决定是否从事外科手术的学生(22% vs 9%;P = .020)的预计学习时间更长。有趣的是,"数字取向低 "的学生从视频中受益(22% vs 13%;P = .021),而 "数字取向高 "的学生则没有:结论:动画视频提高了医学生的学习收获和对外科手术的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Learning Gain in Medical Students by Using Animated Whiteboard-Videos in Comparison to Textbooks in Surgery.

Background: Animated videos have become popular in teaching medical students, although there is a certain lack of evidence concerning its efficacy. Surgery seems to be an ideal field for its application, since animations are very helpful to understand anatomic structures and complex procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of animated videos compared to textbooks on learning gain.

Methods: A prospective 2-arm cohort study with 5th-year medical students was conducted during their 2-week surgical training module. The initial cohort of students received textbook sections on 3 major topics in visceral surgery as learning medium (text cohort). During the following semester, the second cohort of students received 3 animated whiteboard videos (animated videos) containing equivalent content (video cohort). All participants completed a multiple-choice test consisting of 15 questions on the learning content at baseline (pre-test) and after the learning period (post-test) and answered an additional evaluation questionnaire.

Results: Both cohorts were similar in their descriptive data and demonstrated significant learning gain during the 2-week learning period. The video cohort achieved better results (80% vs 73% correct answers; P = .028) and a higher learning gain (17% vs 11%; P = .034) in the post-test compared to the text cohort. The estimated learning time was longer in the video cohort (62 min vs 37 min; P < .001) and watching the videos resulted in higher learning gain (21% vs 6%; P < .001). Subgroups with higher learning gain by video learning were female gender (20% vs 11%; P = .040), native German speakers (18% vs 11%; P = .009), students without prior surgical experience (19% vs 12%; P = .033) and those undecided concerning a surgical career (22% vs 9%; P = .020). Interestingly, "low digital orientation" students benefited from videos (22% vs 13%; P = .021), whereas "high digital orientation" students did not.

Conclusions: Animated videos increase medical students' learning gain and interest in surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信