手术并发症评估加强了脊柱手术过程强度与术后长期使用阿片类药物之间的关系。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005069
Daniel I Rhon, Tina A Greenlee, Bryan K Lawson, Randall R McCafferty, Norman W Gill
{"title":"手术并发症评估加强了脊柱手术过程强度与术后长期使用阿片类药物之间的关系。","authors":"Daniel I Rhon, Tina A Greenlee, Bryan K Lawson, Randall R McCafferty, Norman W Gill","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort using routinely collected health data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare opioid use based on surgery intensity (low or high).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Many factors influence an individual's experience of pain. The extent to which postsurgical opioid use is influenced by the severity of spine surgery is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were individuals undergoing spine surgery in a large military hospital. Procedures were categorized as low intensity (eg, microdiscectomy and laminectomy) and high intensity (eg, fusion and arthroplasty). The Surgical Scheduling System and Military Health System Data Repository were queried for healthcare utilization the 1 year before and after surgery. We compared opioid use after surgery between groups, adjusting for prior opioid use and surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 342 individuals met the inclusion criteria, with mean age 45.4 years (SD 10.9), and 33.0% were women. Of these, 221 (64.6%) underwent a low-intensity procedure and 121 (35.4%) underwent a high-intensity procedure. Mean postoperative opioid prescription fills were greater in the high- versus low-intensity group (9.0 vs. 5.7; P <0.001), as were the mean total days' supply (158.9 vs. 81.8; P <0.001). Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were not significantly different (40.2 vs. 42.7; P =0.287). Of the cohort, 26.3% were chronic opioid users after surgery. Adjusted rates of long-term opioid use were not different between groups when only accounting for prior opioid use but significantly higher for the high-intensity group when adjusting for surgical complications (OR=2.08; 95% CI 1.09-3.97). Of the entire cohort, 52.5% was still filling opioid prescriptions after 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher-intensity procedures were associated with greater postoperative opioid use than lower-intensity procedures. Chronic opioid use was not significantly different between surgical intensity groups when considering only prior opioid use. Chronic opioid use was significantly higher among higher intensity procedures when accounting for surgical complications. The presence of surgical complications is a stronger predictor of postsurgical long-term opioid use in high-intensity surgeries than history of opioid use alone.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1607-1613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Surgical Complications Strengthen the Relationship Between Spine Surgery Procedure Intensity and Chronic Opioid Use After Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel I Rhon, Tina A Greenlee, Bryan K Lawson, Randall R McCafferty, Norman W Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort using routinely collected health data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare opioid use based on surgery intensity (low or high).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Many factors influence an individual's experience of pain. The extent to which postsurgical opioid use is influenced by the severity of spine surgery is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were individuals undergoing spine surgery in a large military hospital. Procedures were categorized as low intensity (eg, microdiscectomy and laminectomy) and high intensity (eg, fusion and arthroplasty). The Surgical Scheduling System and Military Health System Data Repository were queried for healthcare utilization the 1 year before and after surgery. We compared opioid use after surgery between groups, adjusting for prior opioid use and surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 342 individuals met the inclusion criteria, with mean age 45.4 years (SD 10.9), and 33.0% were women. Of these, 221 (64.6%) underwent a low-intensity procedure and 121 (35.4%) underwent a high-intensity procedure. Mean postoperative opioid prescription fills were greater in the high- versus low-intensity group (9.0 vs. 5.7; P <0.001), as were the mean total days' supply (158.9 vs. 81.8; P <0.001). Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were not significantly different (40.2 vs. 42.7; P =0.287). Of the cohort, 26.3% were chronic opioid users after surgery. Adjusted rates of long-term opioid use were not different between groups when only accounting for prior opioid use but significantly higher for the high-intensity group when adjusting for surgical complications (OR=2.08; 95% CI 1.09-3.97). Of the entire cohort, 52.5% was still filling opioid prescriptions after 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher-intensity procedures were associated with greater postoperative opioid use than lower-intensity procedures. Chronic opioid use was not significantly different between surgical intensity groups when considering only prior opioid use. Chronic opioid use was significantly higher among higher intensity procedures when accounting for surgical complications. The presence of surgical complications is a stronger predictor of postsurgical long-term opioid use in high-intensity surgeries than history of opioid use alone.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1607-1613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计使用常规收集的健康数据进行前瞻性队列研究:根据手术强度(低或高)比较阿片类药物的使用情况:影响个人疼痛体验的因素很多。手术后阿片类药物的使用受脊柱手术严重程度的影响程度尚不清楚:方法:参与者是在一家大型军事医院接受脊柱手术的患者。手术分为低强度手术(如显微椎间盘切除术和椎板切除术)和高强度手术(如融合术和关节成形术)。我们在手术日程安排系统和军事卫生系统数据存储库中查询了手术前后一年的医疗保健使用情况。我们比较了不同组别手术后阿片类药物的使用情况,并对之前的阿片类药物使用情况和手术并发症进行了调整:342人符合纳入标准,平均年龄45.4岁(SD 10.9),33.0%为女性。其中,221人(64.6%)接受了低强度手术,121人(35.4%)接受了高强度手术。高强度组与低强度组的术后阿片类药物平均处方用量更大(9.0 对 5.7):高强度手术的术后阿片类药物使用量高于低强度手术。如果仅考虑之前的阿片类药物使用情况,不同手术强度组之间的阿片类药物慢性使用情况并无明显差异。在考虑手术并发症的情况下,高强度手术组的长期阿片类药物使用量明显更高。在高强度手术中,手术并发症的存在比单纯的阿片类药物使用史更能预测术后长期阿片类药物的使用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Surgical Complications Strengthen the Relationship Between Spine Surgery Procedure Intensity and Chronic Opioid Use After Surgery.

Study design: Prospective cohort using routinely collected health data.

Objective: To compare opioid use based on surgery intensity (low or high).

Summary of background data: Many factors influence an individual's experience of pain. The extent to which postsurgical opioid use is influenced by the severity of spine surgery is unknown.

Methods: The participants were individuals undergoing spine surgery in a large military hospital. Procedures were categorized as low intensity (eg, microdiscectomy and laminectomy) and high intensity (eg, fusion and arthroplasty). The Surgical Scheduling System and Military Health System Data Repository were queried for healthcare utilization the 1 year before and after surgery. We compared opioid use after surgery between groups, adjusting for prior opioid use and surgical complications.

Results: A total of 342 individuals met the inclusion criteria, with mean age 45.4 years (SD 10.9), and 33.0% were women. Of these, 221 (64.6%) underwent a low-intensity procedure and 121 (35.4%) underwent a high-intensity procedure. Mean postoperative opioid prescription fills were greater in the high- versus low-intensity group (9.0 vs. 5.7; P <0.001), as were the mean total days' supply (158.9 vs. 81.8; P <0.001). Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were not significantly different (40.2 vs. 42.7; P =0.287). Of the cohort, 26.3% were chronic opioid users after surgery. Adjusted rates of long-term opioid use were not different between groups when only accounting for prior opioid use but significantly higher for the high-intensity group when adjusting for surgical complications (OR=2.08; 95% CI 1.09-3.97). Of the entire cohort, 52.5% was still filling opioid prescriptions after 6 months.

Conclusions: Higher-intensity procedures were associated with greater postoperative opioid use than lower-intensity procedures. Chronic opioid use was not significantly different between surgical intensity groups when considering only prior opioid use. Chronic opioid use was significantly higher among higher intensity procedures when accounting for surgical complications. The presence of surgical complications is a stronger predictor of postsurgical long-term opioid use in high-intensity surgeries than history of opioid use alone.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信