超声生物标志物:对比增强超声和中神成像区分良性和恶性脉络膜肿瘤。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-16 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2024.2366307
Vishal Raval, Jayashree Karmakar, Kiruthika Kannan, Sakshi Oza, Jagruti Patil, Karla P Mercado-Shekhar
{"title":"超声生物标志物:对比增强超声和中神成像区分良性和恶性脉络膜肿瘤。","authors":"Vishal Raval, Jayashree Karmakar, Kiruthika Kannan, Sakshi Oza, Jagruti Patil, Karla P Mercado-Shekhar","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2024.2366307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We hypothesized that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using a microbubble technique to quantify microvascular changes and Nakagami imaging for tissue characterization would provide a new approach for diagnosing and differentiating benign and malignant choroidal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five patients with choroidal melanoma (CM) and five patients with choroidal hemangioma (CH) were selected. Definity®, which contains perflutren microbubbles, was administered as a slow IV bolus (1 ml). CEUS was performed for 1 min postinjection of the contrast agent with ultrasound radiofrequency data acquired from 10 s to 60 s. The contrast value was calculated for the whole tumor region. A gradient magnitude method was used for each postcontrast frames with 1-second interval, and the time-averaged value in pixel intensity gradient of postinjection frames was estimated and reported. Based on the Nakagami statistical distribution model, two Nakagami parameters, m and Ω, where m (shape parameter), representing tissue heterogeneity, and Ω (scale parameter), representing the average energy of backscattered signals, were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CEUS analysis showed that the time-averaged estimated contrast was significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.008) for CH compared to CM. Furthermore, the time-averaged contrast within the normal choroidal region was significantly higher than the choroidal tumor region for both CH and CM (<i>p</i> = 0.001 for CH cases and <i>p</i> < 0.0001 for CM cases). Nakagami analysis showed that the <i>m</i> estimates were significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.032) for CH (<i>m</i> = 0.61) than for CM (<i>m</i> = 0.28), indicating that CH is a more heterogeneous tumor than CM. The Ω estimates were significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.0019) for CH (Ω = 0.15) compared to CM (Ω = 0.03). These results may be due to the more vascular structures in CH compared to CM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quantitative intensity-based perfusion analysis using CEUS and backscattering tissue analysis using Nakagami imaging can provide valuable insights to differentiate benign and malignant choroidal lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1208-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound Biomarkers: Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Nakagami Imaging to Differentiate Benign and Malignant Choroidal Tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Vishal Raval, Jayashree Karmakar, Kiruthika Kannan, Sakshi Oza, Jagruti Patil, Karla P Mercado-Shekhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02713683.2024.2366307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We hypothesized that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using a microbubble technique to quantify microvascular changes and Nakagami imaging for tissue characterization would provide a new approach for diagnosing and differentiating benign and malignant choroidal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five patients with choroidal melanoma (CM) and five patients with choroidal hemangioma (CH) were selected. Definity®, which contains perflutren microbubbles, was administered as a slow IV bolus (1 ml). CEUS was performed for 1 min postinjection of the contrast agent with ultrasound radiofrequency data acquired from 10 s to 60 s. The contrast value was calculated for the whole tumor region. A gradient magnitude method was used for each postcontrast frames with 1-second interval, and the time-averaged value in pixel intensity gradient of postinjection frames was estimated and reported. Based on the Nakagami statistical distribution model, two Nakagami parameters, m and Ω, where m (shape parameter), representing tissue heterogeneity, and Ω (scale parameter), representing the average energy of backscattered signals, were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CEUS analysis showed that the time-averaged estimated contrast was significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.008) for CH compared to CM. Furthermore, the time-averaged contrast within the normal choroidal region was significantly higher than the choroidal tumor region for both CH and CM (<i>p</i> = 0.001 for CH cases and <i>p</i> < 0.0001 for CM cases). Nakagami analysis showed that the <i>m</i> estimates were significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.032) for CH (<i>m</i> = 0.61) than for CM (<i>m</i> = 0.28), indicating that CH is a more heterogeneous tumor than CM. The Ω estimates were significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.0019) for CH (Ω = 0.15) compared to CM (Ω = 0.03). These results may be due to the more vascular structures in CH compared to CM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quantitative intensity-based perfusion analysis using CEUS and backscattering tissue analysis using Nakagami imaging can provide valuable insights to differentiate benign and malignant choroidal lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1208-1214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2366307\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2366307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们假设对比增强超声(CEUS)使用微气泡技术量化微血管变化,并使用中神成像技术描述组织特征,这将为诊断和区分良性和恶性脉络膜病变提供一种新方法:方法: 选择了五名脉络膜黑色素瘤(CM)患者和五名脉络膜血管瘤(CH)患者。Definity®含有perflutren微气泡,以缓慢静脉注射的方式给药(1毫升)。注射造影剂后 1 分钟进行 CEUS,从 10 秒到 60 秒采集超声射频数据。计算整个肿瘤区域的对比度值。采用梯度幅度法对每帧对比剂注射后图像进行计算,每帧图像间隔 1 秒,然后估算并报告注射后图像像素强度梯度的时间平均值。根据中神统计分布模型,研究了两个中神参数 m 和 Ω,其中 m(形状参数)代表组织异质性,Ω(尺度参数)代表反向散射信号的平均能量:CEUS分析表明,与CM相比,CH的时间平均估计对比度明显更高(p = 0.008)。此外,CH 和 CM 正常脉络膜区域内的时间平均对比度明显高于脉络膜肿瘤区域(CH 病例 p = 0.001),CH 的 p m 估计值(m = 0.61)明显高于 CM(m = 0.28)(p = 0.032),表明 CH 是一种异质性更强的肿瘤。与 CM(Ω = 0.03)相比,CH(Ω = 0.15)的Ω估计值明显更高(p = 0.0019)。这些结果可能是由于CH的血管结构多于CM:结论:使用 CEUS 进行基于强度的定量灌注分析和使用 Nakagami 成像进行背散射组织分析可为区分脉络膜良性和恶性病变提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound Biomarkers: Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Nakagami Imaging to Differentiate Benign and Malignant Choroidal Tumor.

Purpose: We hypothesized that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using a microbubble technique to quantify microvascular changes and Nakagami imaging for tissue characterization would provide a new approach for diagnosing and differentiating benign and malignant choroidal lesions.

Methods: Five patients with choroidal melanoma (CM) and five patients with choroidal hemangioma (CH) were selected. Definity®, which contains perflutren microbubbles, was administered as a slow IV bolus (1 ml). CEUS was performed for 1 min postinjection of the contrast agent with ultrasound radiofrequency data acquired from 10 s to 60 s. The contrast value was calculated for the whole tumor region. A gradient magnitude method was used for each postcontrast frames with 1-second interval, and the time-averaged value in pixel intensity gradient of postinjection frames was estimated and reported. Based on the Nakagami statistical distribution model, two Nakagami parameters, m and Ω, where m (shape parameter), representing tissue heterogeneity, and Ω (scale parameter), representing the average energy of backscattered signals, were studied.

Results: CEUS analysis showed that the time-averaged estimated contrast was significantly higher (p = 0.008) for CH compared to CM. Furthermore, the time-averaged contrast within the normal choroidal region was significantly higher than the choroidal tumor region for both CH and CM (p = 0.001 for CH cases and p < 0.0001 for CM cases). Nakagami analysis showed that the m estimates were significantly higher (p = 0.032) for CH (m = 0.61) than for CM (m = 0.28), indicating that CH is a more heterogeneous tumor than CM. The Ω estimates were significantly higher (p = 0.0019) for CH (Ω = 0.15) compared to CM (Ω = 0.03). These results may be due to the more vascular structures in CH compared to CM.

Conclusions: Quantitative intensity-based perfusion analysis using CEUS and backscattering tissue analysis using Nakagami imaging can provide valuable insights to differentiate benign and malignant choroidal lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信