孟加拉国五家三级医院 COVID-19 患者的抗生素使用模式:全国情况

IF 1.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Tabiha Binte Hannan , Shrebash Paul , Md. Mohiuddin Khan , Binayak Bhattacharjee , Md. Zainal Abedin , Pritish Tarafder , T.M. Al-Amin , Muhammad Abdullah Al Amin , Md. Sayedur Rahman , Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury
{"title":"孟加拉国五家三级医院 COVID-19 患者的抗生素使用模式:全国情况","authors":"Tabiha Binte Hannan ,&nbsp;Shrebash Paul ,&nbsp;Md. Mohiuddin Khan ,&nbsp;Binayak Bhattacharjee ,&nbsp;Md. Zainal Abedin ,&nbsp;Pritish Tarafder ,&nbsp;T.M. Al-Amin ,&nbsp;Muhammad Abdullah Al Amin ,&nbsp;Md. Sayedur Rahman ,&nbsp;Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury","doi":"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Irrational and injudicious use of antibiotics in COVID-19 patients could be detrimental in a tropical country with a weak antibiotic stewardship policy such as Bangladesh. This study aimed to focus on the antibiotic usage patterns in COVID-19 patients in Bangladesh.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational study was performed from July 2020 to June 2021 in five tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh. Data on demographic profile, disease severity, and antibiotic usage were collected directly from the patients’ hospital documents.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 3486 (94.4%) patients were treated with at least one antibiotic; 3261 (93.6%) patients received a single antibiotic, and 225 (6.5%) received multiple antibiotics. The most used antibiotics were ceftriaxone (37.3%), co-amoxiclav (26.3%), azithromycin (10.6%), and meropenem (10.3%). According to the World Health Organization AWaRe categorization, most (2260; 69.6%) of the antibiotics prescribed in this study belonged to the “Watch” group. Culture and sensitivity reports were available in 111 cases from one center. Only 18.9% of the patients were found to be co-infected with multi-drug-resistant bacteria (52.4% yield from sputum, 28.6% from urine, and 14.3% from blood).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Strict antibiotic prescribing policy and antibiotic stewardship should be implemented immediately to limit the future threat of antimicrobial resistance in countries such as Bangladesh.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73335,"journal":{"name":"IJID regions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000523/pdfft?md5=abb7ce1b058f0b55c27fcb8c6bb0e4cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2772707624000523-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic usage patterns in COVID-19 patients in five tertiary hospitals from Bangladesh: A countrywide picture\",\"authors\":\"Tabiha Binte Hannan ,&nbsp;Shrebash Paul ,&nbsp;Md. Mohiuddin Khan ,&nbsp;Binayak Bhattacharjee ,&nbsp;Md. Zainal Abedin ,&nbsp;Pritish Tarafder ,&nbsp;T.M. Al-Amin ,&nbsp;Muhammad Abdullah Al Amin ,&nbsp;Md. Sayedur Rahman ,&nbsp;Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Irrational and injudicious use of antibiotics in COVID-19 patients could be detrimental in a tropical country with a weak antibiotic stewardship policy such as Bangladesh. This study aimed to focus on the antibiotic usage patterns in COVID-19 patients in Bangladesh.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational study was performed from July 2020 to June 2021 in five tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh. Data on demographic profile, disease severity, and antibiotic usage were collected directly from the patients’ hospital documents.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 3486 (94.4%) patients were treated with at least one antibiotic; 3261 (93.6%) patients received a single antibiotic, and 225 (6.5%) received multiple antibiotics. The most used antibiotics were ceftriaxone (37.3%), co-amoxiclav (26.3%), azithromycin (10.6%), and meropenem (10.3%). According to the World Health Organization AWaRe categorization, most (2260; 69.6%) of the antibiotics prescribed in this study belonged to the “Watch” group. Culture and sensitivity reports were available in 111 cases from one center. Only 18.9% of the patients were found to be co-infected with multi-drug-resistant bacteria (52.4% yield from sputum, 28.6% from urine, and 14.3% from blood).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Strict antibiotic prescribing policy and antibiotic stewardship should be implemented immediately to limit the future threat of antimicrobial resistance in countries such as Bangladesh.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJID regions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000523/pdfft?md5=abb7ce1b058f0b55c27fcb8c6bb0e4cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2772707624000523-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJID regions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在孟加拉国这样一个抗生素管理政策薄弱的热带国家,COVID-19 患者不合理和滥用抗生素可能会造成危害。本研究旨在关注孟加拉国 COVID-19 患者的抗生素使用模式。方法本前瞻性观察研究于 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月在孟加拉国的五家三级医院进行。结果 共有 3486 名(94.4%)患者接受了至少一种抗生素治疗;3261 名(93.6%)患者接受了单一抗生素治疗,225 名(6.5%)患者接受了多种抗生素治疗。使用最多的抗生素是头孢曲松(37.3%)、联合阿莫西林(26.3%)、阿奇霉素(10.6%)和美罗培南(10.3%)。根据世界卫生组织的 AWaRe 分类,本研究中处方的大多数抗生素(2260 种,69.6%)属于 "观察 "组。一个中心提供了 111 个病例的培养和药敏报告。结论应立即实施严格的抗生素处方政策和抗生素监管措施,以限制抗菌药耐药性在孟加拉国等国家的未来威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Antibiotic usage patterns in COVID-19 patients in five tertiary hospitals from Bangladesh: A countrywide picture

Antibiotic usage patterns in COVID-19 patients in five tertiary hospitals from Bangladesh: A countrywide picture

Objectives

Irrational and injudicious use of antibiotics in COVID-19 patients could be detrimental in a tropical country with a weak antibiotic stewardship policy such as Bangladesh. This study aimed to focus on the antibiotic usage patterns in COVID-19 patients in Bangladesh.

Methods

This prospective observational study was performed from July 2020 to June 2021 in five tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh. Data on demographic profile, disease severity, and antibiotic usage were collected directly from the patients’ hospital documents.

Results

A total of 3486 (94.4%) patients were treated with at least one antibiotic; 3261 (93.6%) patients received a single antibiotic, and 225 (6.5%) received multiple antibiotics. The most used antibiotics were ceftriaxone (37.3%), co-amoxiclav (26.3%), azithromycin (10.6%), and meropenem (10.3%). According to the World Health Organization AWaRe categorization, most (2260; 69.6%) of the antibiotics prescribed in this study belonged to the “Watch” group. Culture and sensitivity reports were available in 111 cases from one center. Only 18.9% of the patients were found to be co-infected with multi-drug-resistant bacteria (52.4% yield from sputum, 28.6% from urine, and 14.3% from blood).

Conclusions

Strict antibiotic prescribing policy and antibiotic stewardship should be implemented immediately to limit the future threat of antimicrobial resistance in countries such as Bangladesh.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJID regions
IJID regions Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信