限制非法放贷的政策干预效果

IF 10.4 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Kaiwen Leong , Huailu Li , Nicola Pavanini , Christoph Walsh
{"title":"限制非法放贷的政策干预效果","authors":"Kaiwen Leong ,&nbsp;Huailu Li ,&nbsp;Nicola Pavanini ,&nbsp;Christoph Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We estimate a structural model of borrowing and lending in the illegal money lending market using a unique panel survey of 1,090 borrowers taking out 11,032 loans from loan sharks. We use the model to evaluate the effects of interventions aimed at limiting this market. We find that an enforcement crackdown that occurred during our sample period increased lenders’ unit cost of harassment and interest rates, while lowering volume of loans, lender profits and borrower welfare. Policies removing borrowers in the middle of the repayment ability distribution, reducing gambling or reducing time discounting are also effective at lowering lender profitability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Economics","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 103894"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X2400117X/pdfft?md5=6cbcee5fa5f237c1ce1e813e61b9f880&pid=1-s2.0-S0304405X2400117X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of policy interventions to limit illegal money lending\",\"authors\":\"Kaiwen Leong ,&nbsp;Huailu Li ,&nbsp;Nicola Pavanini ,&nbsp;Christoph Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We estimate a structural model of borrowing and lending in the illegal money lending market using a unique panel survey of 1,090 borrowers taking out 11,032 loans from loan sharks. We use the model to evaluate the effects of interventions aimed at limiting this market. We find that an enforcement crackdown that occurred during our sample period increased lenders’ unit cost of harassment and interest rates, while lowering volume of loans, lender profits and borrower welfare. Policies removing borrowers in the middle of the repayment ability distribution, reducing gambling or reducing time discounting are also effective at lowering lender profitability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Economics\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X2400117X/pdfft?md5=6cbcee5fa5f237c1ce1e813e61b9f880&pid=1-s2.0-S0304405X2400117X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X2400117X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X2400117X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过对 1090 名从高利贷公司获得 11032 笔贷款的借款人进行独特的面板调查,估算出非法放贷市场的借贷结构模型。我们利用该模型评估了旨在限制该市场的干预措施的效果。我们发现,在样本期内发生的执法打击行动增加了放贷人的单位骚扰成本和利率,同时降低了贷款量、放贷人利润和借款人福利。剔除处于还款能力分布中间的借款人、减少赌博或减少时间折扣的政策也能有效降低贷款人的利润率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of policy interventions to limit illegal money lending

We estimate a structural model of borrowing and lending in the illegal money lending market using a unique panel survey of 1,090 borrowers taking out 11,032 loans from loan sharks. We use the model to evaluate the effects of interventions aimed at limiting this market. We find that an enforcement crackdown that occurred during our sample period increased lenders’ unit cost of harassment and interest rates, while lowering volume of loans, lender profits and borrower welfare. Policies removing borrowers in the middle of the repayment ability distribution, reducing gambling or reducing time discounting are also effective at lowering lender profitability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
192
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Economics provides a specialized forum for the publication of research in the area of financial economics and the theory of the firm, placing primary emphasis on the highest quality analytical, empirical, and clinical contributions in the following major areas: capital markets, financial institutions, corporate finance, corporate governance, and the economics of organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信