在半干旱农业生态系统中,食物特化是葫芦科植物食草动物的驱动因素

IF 2.2 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Hannah L. Gray , Nicholas A. Ivers , Elizabeth Lopez , Brad G. Peter , Scott D. Longing , Margarita M. López-Uribe , Shalene Jha
{"title":"在半干旱农业生态系统中,食物特化是葫芦科植物食草动物的驱动因素","authors":"Hannah L. Gray ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Ivers ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lopez ,&nbsp;Brad G. Peter ,&nbsp;Scott D. Longing ,&nbsp;Margarita M. López-Uribe ,&nbsp;Shalene Jha","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Herbivory is a major fitness pressure for plants and a key driver of crop losses in agroecosystems. Dense monocultures are expected to favor specialist herbivorous insects, particularly those who primarily consume crop species; yet, levels and types of herbivory are not uniform within regional cropping systems. It is essential to determine which local and regional ecological factors drive variation in herbivory in order to support functional agroecosystems that rely less on chemical inputs. Crops in the genus <em>Cucurbita</em> host a suite of both generalist and specialist herbivores that inflict significant damage, yet little is known about the relative contribution of these herbivores to variation in herbivory and how local- and landscape-scale <em>Cucurbita</em> resource concentrations, management practices, and natural enemies mediate this relationship. In this study, we tested whether three foundational ecological hypotheses influenced <em>Cucurbita</em> herbivory across 20 pumpkin fields in the semi-arid Southern High Plains Region of Texas. We used generalized linear mixed models and confirmatory path analysis to assess whether the Density-dependent Herbivory Hypothesis, Resource Concentration Hypothesis, or the Natural Enemies Hypothesis, could explain variation in <em>Cucurbita</em> herbivory and insect dynamics in the context of conventional agronomic practices. We found that herbivory increased over time, indicating that herbivores were causing sustained damage throughout the growing season. We also found that fields with higher local <em>Cucurbita</em> resources had lower herbivory, suggesting a resource dilution effect. Natural enemy communities were more abundant and taxonomically rich in sites with greater generalist herbivore abundance, though predator abundance declined over time, indicating that late-season crop fields are most at risk given high herbivory and low natural enemy-based control. Our findings also suggest that while local resource availability may drive the abundance and richness of arthropod communities, additional agronomic and phenological information is needed to anticipate herbivory risk in an agriculturally dominated landscape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34629,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Insect Science","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000179/pdfft?md5=117dada6a0d516c601975c6b711f0c98&pid=1-s2.0-S2666515824000179-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diet specialization mediates drivers of Cucurbita herbivory in a semi-arid agroecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Hannah L. Gray ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Ivers ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lopez ,&nbsp;Brad G. Peter ,&nbsp;Scott D. Longing ,&nbsp;Margarita M. López-Uribe ,&nbsp;Shalene Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Herbivory is a major fitness pressure for plants and a key driver of crop losses in agroecosystems. Dense monocultures are expected to favor specialist herbivorous insects, particularly those who primarily consume crop species; yet, levels and types of herbivory are not uniform within regional cropping systems. It is essential to determine which local and regional ecological factors drive variation in herbivory in order to support functional agroecosystems that rely less on chemical inputs. Crops in the genus <em>Cucurbita</em> host a suite of both generalist and specialist herbivores that inflict significant damage, yet little is known about the relative contribution of these herbivores to variation in herbivory and how local- and landscape-scale <em>Cucurbita</em> resource concentrations, management practices, and natural enemies mediate this relationship. In this study, we tested whether three foundational ecological hypotheses influenced <em>Cucurbita</em> herbivory across 20 pumpkin fields in the semi-arid Southern High Plains Region of Texas. We used generalized linear mixed models and confirmatory path analysis to assess whether the Density-dependent Herbivory Hypothesis, Resource Concentration Hypothesis, or the Natural Enemies Hypothesis, could explain variation in <em>Cucurbita</em> herbivory and insect dynamics in the context of conventional agronomic practices. We found that herbivory increased over time, indicating that herbivores were causing sustained damage throughout the growing season. We also found that fields with higher local <em>Cucurbita</em> resources had lower herbivory, suggesting a resource dilution effect. Natural enemy communities were more abundant and taxonomically rich in sites with greater generalist herbivore abundance, though predator abundance declined over time, indicating that late-season crop fields are most at risk given high herbivory and low natural enemy-based control. Our findings also suggest that while local resource availability may drive the abundance and richness of arthropod communities, additional agronomic and phenological information is needed to anticipate herbivory risk in an agriculturally dominated landscape.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Insect Science\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000179/pdfft?md5=117dada6a0d516c601975c6b711f0c98&pid=1-s2.0-S2666515824000179-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Insect Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在农业生态系统中,食草昆虫是植物的主要适应压力,也是造成作物损失的主要原因。密集的单一栽培预计会有利于专门的食草昆虫,特别是那些主要食用农作物物种的昆虫;然而,在区域种植系统中,食草的水平和类型并不一致。必须确定哪些地方和区域生态因素会导致草食性的变化,以支持减少依赖化学投入的功能性农业生态系统。葫芦科作物中栖息着大量的通性和专性食草动物,这些食草动物对草食性变化的相对贡献,以及地方和景观尺度的葫芦科资源集中度、管理方法和天敌如何调节这种关系,目前还知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们测试了三个基本生态假设是否会影响德克萨斯州半干旱南部高原地区 20 块南瓜地的葫芦科植物食草量。我们使用广义线性混合模型和确证路径分析来评估密度依赖性草食性假说、资源集中假说或天敌假说是否能解释常规农艺实践背景下葫芦科植物草食性和昆虫动态的变化。我们发现,随着时间的推移,草食动物的数量在增加,这表明草食动物在整个生长季节都在造成持续的破坏。我们还发现,当地葫芦科植物资源较多的田块草食量较低,这表明存在资源稀释效应。在食草动物数量较多的地方,天敌群落更为丰富,分类学上也更为丰富,尽管捕食者的数量会随着时间的推移而减少,这表明在高食草量和低天敌控制的情况下,晚季作物田面临的风险最大。我们的研究结果还表明,虽然当地的资源可用性可能会驱动节肢动物群落的丰度和丰富度,但要预测以农业为主的景观中的食草风险,还需要更多的农艺学和物候学信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diet specialization mediates drivers of Cucurbita herbivory in a semi-arid agroecosystem

Herbivory is a major fitness pressure for plants and a key driver of crop losses in agroecosystems. Dense monocultures are expected to favor specialist herbivorous insects, particularly those who primarily consume crop species; yet, levels and types of herbivory are not uniform within regional cropping systems. It is essential to determine which local and regional ecological factors drive variation in herbivory in order to support functional agroecosystems that rely less on chemical inputs. Crops in the genus Cucurbita host a suite of both generalist and specialist herbivores that inflict significant damage, yet little is known about the relative contribution of these herbivores to variation in herbivory and how local- and landscape-scale Cucurbita resource concentrations, management practices, and natural enemies mediate this relationship. In this study, we tested whether three foundational ecological hypotheses influenced Cucurbita herbivory across 20 pumpkin fields in the semi-arid Southern High Plains Region of Texas. We used generalized linear mixed models and confirmatory path analysis to assess whether the Density-dependent Herbivory Hypothesis, Resource Concentration Hypothesis, or the Natural Enemies Hypothesis, could explain variation in Cucurbita herbivory and insect dynamics in the context of conventional agronomic practices. We found that herbivory increased over time, indicating that herbivores were causing sustained damage throughout the growing season. We also found that fields with higher local Cucurbita resources had lower herbivory, suggesting a resource dilution effect. Natural enemy communities were more abundant and taxonomically rich in sites with greater generalist herbivore abundance, though predator abundance declined over time, indicating that late-season crop fields are most at risk given high herbivory and low natural enemy-based control. Our findings also suggest that while local resource availability may drive the abundance and richness of arthropod communities, additional agronomic and phenological information is needed to anticipate herbivory risk in an agriculturally dominated landscape.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Insect Science
Current Research in Insect Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信