三种抗菌剂对牛冠状病毒和人冠状病毒 OC43 这两种 SARS-COV-2 代用品在硬质或软质无孔材料上的疗效。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Breanna Kimbrell , Jinge Huang , Angela Fraser , Xiuping Jiang
{"title":"三种抗菌剂对牛冠状病毒和人冠状病毒 OC43 这两种 SARS-COV-2 代用品在硬质或软质无孔材料上的疗效。","authors":"Breanna Kimbrell ,&nbsp;Jinge Huang ,&nbsp;Angela Fraser ,&nbsp;Xiuping Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The efficacy of three antimicrobials was evaluated against two severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surrogates – bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and human coronavirus (HCoV) OC43 – on hard and soft nonporous materials. Three antimicrobials with three different active ingredients (chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, and quaternary ammonium compound + alcohol) were studied. Initially, a neutralization method was optimized for each antimicrobial. Then, we determined their efficacy against BCoV and HCoV OC43 in both suspension and on surfaces made with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic and vinyl upholstery fabric. All tests were conducted under ambient environmental conditions with a soil load of 5% fetal bovine serum. After a 2-min exposure, all three antimicrobials achieved a &gt;3.0 log<sub>10</sub> reduction in viral titers in suspension. All three also reduced virus infectivity on both surface materials below the detection limit (0.6 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/carrier). Treatments in which the reduction in virus titer was &lt;3.0 log<sub>10</sub> were attributed to a decreased dynamic range on the carrier during drying prior to disinfection. The carrier data revealed that both surrogates were inactivated more rapidly (<em>p</em> &lt;0.05) on vinyl or under conditions of high relative humidity. Three classes of antimicrobials were efficacious against both SARS-CoV-2 surrogate viruses, with BCoV demonstrating slightly less sensitivity compared to HCoV OC43. These findings also illustrate the importance of (1) optimizing the neutralization method and (2) considering relative humidity as a key factor for efficacy testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001005/pdfft?md5=0947d24228877b741b951aff8bbc90c2&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24001005-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Three Antimicrobials Against two SARS-COV-2 Surrogates, Bovine Coronavirus and Human Coronavirus OC43, on Hard or Soft Nonporous Materials\",\"authors\":\"Breanna Kimbrell ,&nbsp;Jinge Huang ,&nbsp;Angela Fraser ,&nbsp;Xiuping Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The efficacy of three antimicrobials was evaluated against two severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surrogates – bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and human coronavirus (HCoV) OC43 – on hard and soft nonporous materials. Three antimicrobials with three different active ingredients (chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, and quaternary ammonium compound + alcohol) were studied. Initially, a neutralization method was optimized for each antimicrobial. Then, we determined their efficacy against BCoV and HCoV OC43 in both suspension and on surfaces made with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic and vinyl upholstery fabric. All tests were conducted under ambient environmental conditions with a soil load of 5% fetal bovine serum. After a 2-min exposure, all three antimicrobials achieved a &gt;3.0 log<sub>10</sub> reduction in viral titers in suspension. All three also reduced virus infectivity on both surface materials below the detection limit (0.6 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/carrier). Treatments in which the reduction in virus titer was &lt;3.0 log<sub>10</sub> were attributed to a decreased dynamic range on the carrier during drying prior to disinfection. The carrier data revealed that both surrogates were inactivated more rapidly (<em>p</em> &lt;0.05) on vinyl or under conditions of high relative humidity. Three classes of antimicrobials were efficacious against both SARS-CoV-2 surrogate viruses, with BCoV demonstrating slightly less sensitivity compared to HCoV OC43. These findings also illustrate the importance of (1) optimizing the neutralization method and (2) considering relative humidity as a key factor for efficacy testing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001005/pdfft?md5=0947d24228877b741b951aff8bbc90c2&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24001005-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对牛冠状病毒 (BCoV) 和人冠状病毒 (HCoV) OC43 这两种严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 代用品,对三种抗菌剂在硬质和软质无孔材料上的功效进行了评估。研究了含有三种不同活性成分(氯、过氧化氢和季铵盐化合物 + 醇)的三种抗菌剂。首先,对每种抗菌剂的中和方法进行了优化。然后,我们测定了它们在悬浮液中以及在聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PET)塑料和乙烯基室内装潢织物表面对 BCoV 和 HCoV OC43 的功效。所有测试均在环境条件下进行,土壤中含有 5%的胎牛血清。接触 2 分钟后,三种抗菌剂都能使悬浮液中的病毒滴度降低 3.0 log10 以上。这三种抗菌剂还能将两种表面材料上的病毒传染性降至检测限以下(0.6 log10 TCID50/载体)。病毒滴度降低 10 的处理是由于载体在消毒前的干燥过程中动态范围减小所致。载体数据显示,在乙烯基或相对湿度较高的条件下,两种代用品的灭活速度更快(p < 0.05)。三类抗菌剂对两种 SARS-CoV-2 代用病毒都有效,其中 BCoV 的敏感性略低于 HCoV OC43。这些发现还说明了以下两点的重要性:(1) 优化中和方法;(2) 将相对湿度作为药效测试的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Three Antimicrobials Against two SARS-COV-2 Surrogates, Bovine Coronavirus and Human Coronavirus OC43, on Hard or Soft Nonporous Materials

The efficacy of three antimicrobials was evaluated against two severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surrogates – bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and human coronavirus (HCoV) OC43 – on hard and soft nonporous materials. Three antimicrobials with three different active ingredients (chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, and quaternary ammonium compound + alcohol) were studied. Initially, a neutralization method was optimized for each antimicrobial. Then, we determined their efficacy against BCoV and HCoV OC43 in both suspension and on surfaces made with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic and vinyl upholstery fabric. All tests were conducted under ambient environmental conditions with a soil load of 5% fetal bovine serum. After a 2-min exposure, all three antimicrobials achieved a >3.0 log10 reduction in viral titers in suspension. All three also reduced virus infectivity on both surface materials below the detection limit (0.6 log10 TCID50/carrier). Treatments in which the reduction in virus titer was <3.0 log10 were attributed to a decreased dynamic range on the carrier during drying prior to disinfection. The carrier data revealed that both surrogates were inactivated more rapidly (p <0.05) on vinyl or under conditions of high relative humidity. Three classes of antimicrobials were efficacious against both SARS-CoV-2 surrogate viruses, with BCoV demonstrating slightly less sensitivity compared to HCoV OC43. These findings also illustrate the importance of (1) optimizing the neutralization method and (2) considering relative humidity as a key factor for efficacy testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信