{"title":"什么是学术图书馆员理想的电子数据交换学习?通过欣赏式探究发现电子数据交换学习故事","authors":"Megan Fitzgibbons, Chloe Lei","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Academic libraries across North America purport to be prioritizing equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), but investigations into how librarians learn about EDI are lacking. In this study, we interviewed 21 academic librarians in Canada about their EDI learning journeys using the strengths-based appreciative inquiry approach. This paper focuses on the question, “What shapes ideal learning experiences related to EDI for academic librarians?” In uncovering librarians' stories of learning transformations, we found that EDI learning often elicits discomfort; it involves recognizing one's biases, being vulnerable, and making mistakes. However, these learning stories can motivate and inspire others to learn and engage in critical self-reflection through questioning assumptions and underlying beliefs. EDI learning in professional contexts was inextricably linked to learning in informal and personal contexts, and positionality is essential to how learning is shaped. Learning was described to be ideal in low-pressure, authentic, brave environments that facilitated meaningful conversations, with institutional support. However, there seemed to be a disconnect between one's learning and one's ability to effect change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000697/pdfft?md5=c67bf67c0242d3706aa7d221d9057fb6&pid=1-s2.0-S0099133324000697-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is ideal EDI learning for academic librarians? Discovering EDI learning stories through appreciative inquiry\",\"authors\":\"Megan Fitzgibbons, Chloe Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Academic libraries across North America purport to be prioritizing equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), but investigations into how librarians learn about EDI are lacking. In this study, we interviewed 21 academic librarians in Canada about their EDI learning journeys using the strengths-based appreciative inquiry approach. This paper focuses on the question, “What shapes ideal learning experiences related to EDI for academic librarians?” In uncovering librarians' stories of learning transformations, we found that EDI learning often elicits discomfort; it involves recognizing one's biases, being vulnerable, and making mistakes. However, these learning stories can motivate and inspire others to learn and engage in critical self-reflection through questioning assumptions and underlying beliefs. EDI learning in professional contexts was inextricably linked to learning in informal and personal contexts, and positionality is essential to how learning is shaped. Learning was described to be ideal in low-pressure, authentic, brave environments that facilitated meaningful conversations, with institutional support. However, there seemed to be a disconnect between one's learning and one's ability to effect change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000697/pdfft?md5=c67bf67c0242d3706aa7d221d9057fb6&pid=1-s2.0-S0099133324000697-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000697\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000697","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
整个北美地区的学术图书馆都声称要优先考虑公平、多样性和包容性(EDI),但却缺乏对图书馆员如何学习 EDI 的调查。在这项研究中,我们采访了加拿大的 21 名学术图书馆员,了解他们采用基于优势的欣赏式探究方法学习 EDI 的历程。本文重点探讨的问题是:"是什么塑造了学术图书馆员与电子数据交换相关的理想学习经历?在发掘图书馆员的学习转变故事时,我们发现电子数据交换学习往往会引起不适;它涉及到认识到自己的偏见、脆弱和犯错。然而,这些学习故事可以激励和鼓舞他人学习,并通过质疑假设和基本信念进行批判性的自我反思。专业背景下的电子数据交换学习与非正规和个人背景下的学习密不可分,定位对于如何形成学习至关重要。在低压力、真实、勇敢的环境中学习是理想的,这样的环境有利于进行有意义的对话,并得到机构的支持。然而,一个人的学习与他实现变革的能力之间似乎存在脱节。
What is ideal EDI learning for academic librarians? Discovering EDI learning stories through appreciative inquiry
Academic libraries across North America purport to be prioritizing equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), but investigations into how librarians learn about EDI are lacking. In this study, we interviewed 21 academic librarians in Canada about their EDI learning journeys using the strengths-based appreciative inquiry approach. This paper focuses on the question, “What shapes ideal learning experiences related to EDI for academic librarians?” In uncovering librarians' stories of learning transformations, we found that EDI learning often elicits discomfort; it involves recognizing one's biases, being vulnerable, and making mistakes. However, these learning stories can motivate and inspire others to learn and engage in critical self-reflection through questioning assumptions and underlying beliefs. EDI learning in professional contexts was inextricably linked to learning in informal and personal contexts, and positionality is essential to how learning is shaped. Learning was described to be ideal in low-pressure, authentic, brave environments that facilitated meaningful conversations, with institutional support. However, there seemed to be a disconnect between one's learning and one's ability to effect change.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.