精神病患者在休息和执行任务时全脑功能异质性增加。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
Brian P. Keane , Yonatan T. Abrham , Luke J. Hearne , Howard Bi , Boyang Hu
{"title":"精神病患者在休息和执行任务时全脑功能异质性增加。","authors":"Brian P. Keane ,&nbsp;Yonatan T. Abrham ,&nbsp;Luke J. Hearne ,&nbsp;Howard Bi ,&nbsp;Boyang Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Past work has shown that people with schizophrenia exhibit more cross-subject heterogeneity in their functional connectivity patterns. However, it remains unclear whether specific brain networks are implicated, whether common confounds could explain the results, or whether task activations might also be more heterogeneous. Unambiguously establishing the existence and extent of functional heterogeneity constitutes a first step toward understanding why it emerges and what it means clinically. Methods. We first leveraged data from the HCP Early Psychosis project. Functional connectivity (FC) was extracted from 718 parcels via principal components regression. Networks were defined via a brain network partition (<span>Ji et al., 2019</span>). We also examined an independent data set with controls, later-stage schizophrenia patients, and ADHD patients during rest and during a working memory task. We quantified heterogeneity by averaging the Pearson correlation distance of each subject’s FC or task activity pattern to that of every other subject of the same cohort. Results. Affective and non-affective early psychosis patients exhibited more cross-subject whole-brain heterogeneity than healthy controls (ps &lt; 0.001, Hedges’ g &gt; 0.74). Increased heterogeneity could be found in up to seven networks. In-scanner motion, medication, nicotine, and comorbidities could not explain the results. Later-stage schizophrenia patients exhibited heterogeneous connectivity patterns and task activations compared to ADHD and control subjects. Interestingly, individual connection weights, parcel-wise task activations, and network averages thereof were not more variable in patients, suggesting that heterogeneity becomes most obvious over large-scale patterns. Conclusion. Whole-brain cross-subject functional heterogeneity characterizes psychosis during rest and task. Developmental and pathophysiological consequences are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221315822400069X/pdfft?md5=00570ab0a646f81522276e39f3386c0a&pid=1-s2.0-S221315822400069X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased whole-brain functional heterogeneity in psychosis during rest and task\",\"authors\":\"Brian P. Keane ,&nbsp;Yonatan T. Abrham ,&nbsp;Luke J. Hearne ,&nbsp;Howard Bi ,&nbsp;Boyang Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Past work has shown that people with schizophrenia exhibit more cross-subject heterogeneity in their functional connectivity patterns. However, it remains unclear whether specific brain networks are implicated, whether common confounds could explain the results, or whether task activations might also be more heterogeneous. Unambiguously establishing the existence and extent of functional heterogeneity constitutes a first step toward understanding why it emerges and what it means clinically. Methods. We first leveraged data from the HCP Early Psychosis project. Functional connectivity (FC) was extracted from 718 parcels via principal components regression. Networks were defined via a brain network partition (<span>Ji et al., 2019</span>). We also examined an independent data set with controls, later-stage schizophrenia patients, and ADHD patients during rest and during a working memory task. We quantified heterogeneity by averaging the Pearson correlation distance of each subject’s FC or task activity pattern to that of every other subject of the same cohort. Results. Affective and non-affective early psychosis patients exhibited more cross-subject whole-brain heterogeneity than healthy controls (ps &lt; 0.001, Hedges’ g &gt; 0.74). Increased heterogeneity could be found in up to seven networks. In-scanner motion, medication, nicotine, and comorbidities could not explain the results. Later-stage schizophrenia patients exhibited heterogeneous connectivity patterns and task activations compared to ADHD and control subjects. Interestingly, individual connection weights, parcel-wise task activations, and network averages thereof were not more variable in patients, suggesting that heterogeneity becomes most obvious over large-scale patterns. Conclusion. Whole-brain cross-subject functional heterogeneity characterizes psychosis during rest and task. Developmental and pathophysiological consequences are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221315822400069X/pdfft?md5=00570ab0a646f81522276e39f3386c0a&pid=1-s2.0-S221315822400069X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221315822400069X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221315822400069X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去的研究表明,精神分裂症患者的功能连接模式表现出更多的跨受试者异质性。然而,目前仍不清楚是否牵涉到特定的大脑网络,是否常见的混杂因素可以解释这些结果,或者任务激活是否也可能更具异质性。明确地确定功能异质性的存在及其程度,是理解功能异质性出现的原因及其临床意义的第一步:我们首先利用了 HCP 早期精神病项目的数据。方法:我们首先利用 HCP 早期精神病项目的数据,通过主成分回归从 718 个区块中提取功能连接性(FC)。网络是通过脑网络分区定义的(Ji 等人,2019 年)。我们还研究了对照组、晚期精神分裂症患者和多动症患者在休息和工作记忆任务期间的独立数据集。我们通过平均每个受试者的 FC 或任务活动模式与同组其他受试者的皮尔逊相关距离来量化异质性:结果:与健康对照组相比,情感性和非情感性早期精神病患者表现出更多的跨受试者全脑异质性(ps 0.74)。在多达七个网络中可以发现异质性的增加。扫描仪内运动、药物、尼古丁和合并症无法解释这些结果。与多动症和对照组受试者相比,后期精神分裂症患者表现出异质性连接模式和任务激活。有趣的是,患者的个体连接权重、包裹任务激活和网络平均值并没有更大的变化,这表明异质性在大规模模式中最为明显:结论:全脑跨受试者功能异质性是精神病患者在休息和任务期间的特征。本文讨论了发展和病理生理学的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increased whole-brain functional heterogeneity in psychosis during rest and task

Past work has shown that people with schizophrenia exhibit more cross-subject heterogeneity in their functional connectivity patterns. However, it remains unclear whether specific brain networks are implicated, whether common confounds could explain the results, or whether task activations might also be more heterogeneous. Unambiguously establishing the existence and extent of functional heterogeneity constitutes a first step toward understanding why it emerges and what it means clinically. Methods. We first leveraged data from the HCP Early Psychosis project. Functional connectivity (FC) was extracted from 718 parcels via principal components regression. Networks were defined via a brain network partition (Ji et al., 2019). We also examined an independent data set with controls, later-stage schizophrenia patients, and ADHD patients during rest and during a working memory task. We quantified heterogeneity by averaging the Pearson correlation distance of each subject’s FC or task activity pattern to that of every other subject of the same cohort. Results. Affective and non-affective early psychosis patients exhibited more cross-subject whole-brain heterogeneity than healthy controls (ps < 0.001, Hedges’ g > 0.74). Increased heterogeneity could be found in up to seven networks. In-scanner motion, medication, nicotine, and comorbidities could not explain the results. Later-stage schizophrenia patients exhibited heterogeneous connectivity patterns and task activations compared to ADHD and control subjects. Interestingly, individual connection weights, parcel-wise task activations, and network averages thereof were not more variable in patients, suggesting that heterogeneity becomes most obvious over large-scale patterns. Conclusion. Whole-brain cross-subject functional heterogeneity characterizes psychosis during rest and task. Developmental and pathophysiological consequences are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信