Rose-Marie Lindkvist, Katarina Steen Carlsson, Daiva Daukantaitė, Lena Flyckt, Sofie Westling
{"title":"通过自我转介进行简短入院,作为对有自杀风险的自残者的常规护理的补充:瑞典随机对照试验后的成本效益和 4 年健康经济后果。","authors":"Rose-Marie Lindkvist, Katarina Steen Carlsson, Daiva Daukantaitė, Lena Flyckt, Sofie Westling","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2366854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brief Admission by self-referral (BA) is a crisis-management intervention standardized for individuals with self-harm at risk of suicide. We analyzed its health-economic consequences.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>BA plus treatment as usual (TAU) was compared with TAU alone in a 12-month randomized controlled trial with 117 participants regarding costs for hospital admissions, coercive measures, emergency care and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs). Participants were followed from 12 months before baseline to up to five years after.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over one year BA was associated with a mean annual cost reduction of 4800 or incremental cost of 4600 euros, depending on bed occupancy assumption. Cost-savings were greatest for individuals with >180 admission days in the year before baseline. In terms of health outcomes BA was associated with a QALY gain of 0.078. Uncertainty analyses indicated a significant QALY gain and ambiguity in costs, resulting in BA either dominating TAU or costing 59 000 euros per gained QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BA is likely to produce QALY gains for individuals living with self-harm and suicidality. Cost-effectiveness depends on targeting high-need individuals and comparable bed utilization between BA and other psychiatric admissions. Future research should elaborate the explanatory factors for individual variations in the usage and benefit of BA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"497-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief admission by self-referral as an add-on to usual care for individuals with self-harm at risk of suicide: cost-effectiveness and 4-year health-economic consequences after a Swedish randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rose-Marie Lindkvist, Katarina Steen Carlsson, Daiva Daukantaitė, Lena Flyckt, Sofie Westling\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08039488.2024.2366854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brief Admission by self-referral (BA) is a crisis-management intervention standardized for individuals with self-harm at risk of suicide. We analyzed its health-economic consequences.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>BA plus treatment as usual (TAU) was compared with TAU alone in a 12-month randomized controlled trial with 117 participants regarding costs for hospital admissions, coercive measures, emergency care and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs). Participants were followed from 12 months before baseline to up to five years after.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over one year BA was associated with a mean annual cost reduction of 4800 or incremental cost of 4600 euros, depending on bed occupancy assumption. Cost-savings were greatest for individuals with >180 admission days in the year before baseline. In terms of health outcomes BA was associated with a QALY gain of 0.078. Uncertainty analyses indicated a significant QALY gain and ambiguity in costs, resulting in BA either dominating TAU or costing 59 000 euros per gained QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BA is likely to produce QALY gains for individuals living with self-harm and suicidality. Cost-effectiveness depends on targeting high-need individuals and comparable bed utilization between BA and other psychiatric admissions. Future research should elaborate the explanatory factors for individual variations in the usage and benefit of BA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"497-506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2366854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2366854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:自我转介的简短入院治疗(BA)是一种危机管理干预措施,针对有自杀风险的自残者进行标准化治疗。我们对其健康经济后果进行了分析:在一项为期 12 个月的随机对照试验中,我们对 BA 加常规治疗(TAU)与单纯的 TAU 进行了比较,共有 117 名参与者参加了这项试验,比较的内容包括入院费用、强制措施、急诊护理和健康结果(质量调整生命年;QALYs)。从基线前的 12 个月到基线后的 5 年,对参与者进行了跟踪调查:在一年的时间里,根据床位占用率的假设,BA 每年可减少平均成本 4800 欧元或增加成本 4600 欧元。基线前一年入院天数大于 180 天的患者节省的费用最多。就健康结果而言,BA 的 QALY 收益为 0.078。不确定性分析表明,QALY收益显著,但成本不明确,因此BA要么在TAU中占主导地位,要么每个QALY收益的成本为59 000欧元:BA有可能为自残和自杀者带来QALY收益。成本效益取决于是否针对高需求人群,以及BA和其他精神科住院患者的床位利用率是否相当。未来的研究应详细阐述使用和受益于 BA 的个体差异的解释因素。
Brief admission by self-referral as an add-on to usual care for individuals with self-harm at risk of suicide: cost-effectiveness and 4-year health-economic consequences after a Swedish randomized controlled trial.
Background: Brief Admission by self-referral (BA) is a crisis-management intervention standardized for individuals with self-harm at risk of suicide. We analyzed its health-economic consequences.
Materials and methods: BA plus treatment as usual (TAU) was compared with TAU alone in a 12-month randomized controlled trial with 117 participants regarding costs for hospital admissions, coercive measures, emergency care and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs). Participants were followed from 12 months before baseline to up to five years after.
Results: Over one year BA was associated with a mean annual cost reduction of 4800 or incremental cost of 4600 euros, depending on bed occupancy assumption. Cost-savings were greatest for individuals with >180 admission days in the year before baseline. In terms of health outcomes BA was associated with a QALY gain of 0.078. Uncertainty analyses indicated a significant QALY gain and ambiguity in costs, resulting in BA either dominating TAU or costing 59 000 euros per gained QALY.
Conclusion: BA is likely to produce QALY gains for individuals living with self-harm and suicidality. Cost-effectiveness depends on targeting high-need individuals and comparable bed utilization between BA and other psychiatric admissions. Future research should elaborate the explanatory factors for individual variations in the usage and benefit of BA.
期刊介绍:
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry.
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including:
Child psychiatry
Adult psychiatry
Psychotherapy
Pharmacotherapy
Social psychiatry
Psychosomatic medicine
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.