在大海妖(siren lacertina)骨膜内植入特比萘芬的试点研究。

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Anastasia E Towe, Rebecca H Hardman, Sherry Cox, Wesley C Sheley, Joseph A DeMarchi, E Davis Carter, Debra L Miller
{"title":"在大海妖(siren lacertina)骨膜内植入特比萘芬的试点研究。","authors":"Anastasia E Towe, Rebecca H Hardman, Sherry Cox, Wesley C Sheley, Joseph A DeMarchi, E Davis Carter, Debra L Miller","doi":"10.1638/2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chytridiomycosis caused by <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> (<i>Bd</i>) has been documented in greater sirens (<i>Siren lacertina</i>) in the wild and in the pet trade. This study evaluated the use of terbinafine-impregnated implants for chytridiomycosis prophylaxis in greater sirens exposed to <i>Bd</i>. Implants were placed intracoelomically in both control (blank implant, n = 4) and treatment (24.5 mg of terbinafine implant, n = 4) groups. Sirens were exposed to <i>Bd</i> zoospores via 24-h immersion bath at 1 and 2 mon postimplant placement. Blood was collected monthly for plasma terbinafine levels, and skin swabs were collected weekly for <i>Bd</i> quantitative PCR. Animals with terbinafine implants had detectable concentrations of plasma terbinafine ranging from 17 to 102 ng/ml. Only one terbinafine-implanted animal had a peak concentration above the published minimum inhibitory concentration for terbinafine against <i>Bd</i> zoospores (63 ng/ml); however, it is unknown how plasma terbinafine concentrations relate to concentrations in the skin. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in clinical signs or <i>Bd</i> clearance rate, and no adverse effects from implants were observed. These findings indicate using intracoelomic drug implants for drug delivery in amphibians is safe; however, terbinafine efficacy in preventing <i>Bd</i> chytridiomycosis in sirens remains unclear. Further investigation of the use of intracoelomic implants and identification of effective drugs and doses in other amphibian species against <i>Bd</i> and other infectious diseases is warranted, as this may provide a practical method for long-term drug delivery in wildlife.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PILOT STUDY OF INTRACOELOMIC TERBINAFINE IMPLANTS IN GREATER SIRENS (<i>SIREN LACERTINA</i>).\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia E Towe, Rebecca H Hardman, Sherry Cox, Wesley C Sheley, Joseph A DeMarchi, E Davis Carter, Debra L Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1638/2023-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chytridiomycosis caused by <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> (<i>Bd</i>) has been documented in greater sirens (<i>Siren lacertina</i>) in the wild and in the pet trade. This study evaluated the use of terbinafine-impregnated implants for chytridiomycosis prophylaxis in greater sirens exposed to <i>Bd</i>. Implants were placed intracoelomically in both control (blank implant, n = 4) and treatment (24.5 mg of terbinafine implant, n = 4) groups. Sirens were exposed to <i>Bd</i> zoospores via 24-h immersion bath at 1 and 2 mon postimplant placement. Blood was collected monthly for plasma terbinafine levels, and skin swabs were collected weekly for <i>Bd</i> quantitative PCR. Animals with terbinafine implants had detectable concentrations of plasma terbinafine ranging from 17 to 102 ng/ml. Only one terbinafine-implanted animal had a peak concentration above the published minimum inhibitory concentration for terbinafine against <i>Bd</i> zoospores (63 ng/ml); however, it is unknown how plasma terbinafine concentrations relate to concentrations in the skin. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in clinical signs or <i>Bd</i> clearance rate, and no adverse effects from implants were observed. These findings indicate using intracoelomic drug implants for drug delivery in amphibians is safe; however, terbinafine efficacy in preventing <i>Bd</i> chytridiomycosis in sirens remains unclear. Further investigation of the use of intracoelomic implants and identification of effective drugs and doses in other amphibian species against <i>Bd</i> and other infectious diseases is warranted, as this may provide a practical method for long-term drug delivery in wildlife.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1638/2023-0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2023-0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在野生和宠物交易中,有记录表明大海马(Siren lacertina)感染了由蝙蝠弧菌(Bd)引起的糜烂性真菌病。本研究评估了使用特比萘芬浸渍的植入物对暴露于 Bd 的大海马进行糜烂性真菌病预防的情况。对照组(空白植入物,n = 4)和治疗组(24.5 毫克特比萘芬植入物,n = 4)均在腔内植入植入物。在植入后的 1 个月和 2 个月,通过 24 小时浸泡浴,让警报器暴露于 Bd 虫孢子。每月采集血液检测血浆中的特比萘芬水平,每周采集皮肤拭子进行 Bd 定量 PCR 检测。植入特比萘芬的动物血浆中可检测到的特比萘芬浓度从 17 到 102 纳克/毫升不等。只有一只植入特比萘芬的动物的特比萘芬峰值浓度高于已公布的特比萘芬对 Bd 虫孢子的最低抑制浓度(63 纳克/毫升);但血浆中的特比萘芬浓度与皮肤中的浓度之间的关系尚不清楚。两个治疗组在临床症状或 Bd 清除率方面没有差异,也没有观察到植入物的不良反应。这些研究结果表明,在两栖动物体内使用皮腔内药物植入体给药是安全的;但是,特比萘芬在预防海龙糜烂性Bd病方面的疗效仍不明确。有必要进一步研究在其他两栖动物物种中使用骨膜内植入物以及确定有效的药物和剂量,以预防蝙蝠疫病和其他传染病,因为这可能为在野生动物中长期给药提供一种实用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PILOT STUDY OF INTRACOELOMIC TERBINAFINE IMPLANTS IN GREATER SIRENS (SIREN LACERTINA).

Chytridiomycosis caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) has been documented in greater sirens (Siren lacertina) in the wild and in the pet trade. This study evaluated the use of terbinafine-impregnated implants for chytridiomycosis prophylaxis in greater sirens exposed to Bd. Implants were placed intracoelomically in both control (blank implant, n = 4) and treatment (24.5 mg of terbinafine implant, n = 4) groups. Sirens were exposed to Bd zoospores via 24-h immersion bath at 1 and 2 mon postimplant placement. Blood was collected monthly for plasma terbinafine levels, and skin swabs were collected weekly for Bd quantitative PCR. Animals with terbinafine implants had detectable concentrations of plasma terbinafine ranging from 17 to 102 ng/ml. Only one terbinafine-implanted animal had a peak concentration above the published minimum inhibitory concentration for terbinafine against Bd zoospores (63 ng/ml); however, it is unknown how plasma terbinafine concentrations relate to concentrations in the skin. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in clinical signs or Bd clearance rate, and no adverse effects from implants were observed. These findings indicate using intracoelomic drug implants for drug delivery in amphibians is safe; however, terbinafine efficacy in preventing Bd chytridiomycosis in sirens remains unclear. Further investigation of the use of intracoelomic implants and identification of effective drugs and doses in other amphibian species against Bd and other infectious diseases is warranted, as this may provide a practical method for long-term drug delivery in wildlife.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers. The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution. Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信