Cinara Paul, Ben Schöttker, Mechthild Hartmann, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Hermann Brenner, Beate Wild
{"title":"与中老年人病例复杂性相关的性别特异性因素--来自一项大型人口研究的证据。","authors":"Cinara Paul, Ben Schöttker, Mechthild Hartmann, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Hermann Brenner, Beate Wild","doi":"10.1002/gps.6113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate gender-specific factors associated with case complexity in a population-based sample of middle-aged and older adults using a holistic approach to complexity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were derived from the 8-year follow-up home visits of the ESTHER study—a German population-based study in middle-aged and older adults. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted for 2932 persons (aged 57–84). Complexity was assessed by the well-established INTERMED for the elderly interview, which uses a holistic approach to the definition of case complexity. The association between various bio-psycho-social variables and case complexity was analyzed using gender-specific logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic factors (age, marital status, education).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Prevalence of complexity was 8.3% with significantly higher prevalence in female (10.6%) compared to male (5.8%) participants (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Variables associated with increased odds for complexity in both, women and men were: being divorced (odds ratio [OR] women: 1.86, 95% CI 1.05–3.30; OR men: 3.19, 1.25–8.12), higher total somatic morbidity (women: 1.08, 1.04–1.12; men: 1.06, 1.02–1.11), higher depression severity (women: 1.34, 1.28–1.40; men: 1.35, 1.27–1.44), and higher loneliness scores (women: 1.19, 1.05–1.36; men: 1.23, 1.03–1.47). Women (but not men) with obesity (Body mass index [BMI] ≥30) had higher odds (1.79, 1.11–2.89) for being complex compared to those with a BMI <25. High oxidative stress measured by derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites in serum was associated with 2.02 (1.09–3.74) higher odds for complexity only in men.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides epidemiological evidence on gender differences in prevalence and factors associated with case complexity in middle-aged and older adults. Moreover, this study adds to the holistic understanding of complexity by identifying novel variables linked to complexity among middle-aged and older individuals. These factors include loneliness for both genders, and high oxidative stress for men. These findings should be confirmed in future longitudinal studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.6113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-specific factors associated with case complexity in middle-aged and older adults—Evidence from a large population-based study\",\"authors\":\"Cinara Paul, Ben Schöttker, Mechthild Hartmann, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Hermann Brenner, Beate Wild\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gps.6113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate gender-specific factors associated with case complexity in a population-based sample of middle-aged and older adults using a holistic approach to complexity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were derived from the 8-year follow-up home visits of the ESTHER study—a German population-based study in middle-aged and older adults. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted for 2932 persons (aged 57–84). Complexity was assessed by the well-established INTERMED for the elderly interview, which uses a holistic approach to the definition of case complexity. The association between various bio-psycho-social variables and case complexity was analyzed using gender-specific logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic factors (age, marital status, education).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prevalence of complexity was 8.3% with significantly higher prevalence in female (10.6%) compared to male (5.8%) participants (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Variables associated with increased odds for complexity in both, women and men were: being divorced (odds ratio [OR] women: 1.86, 95% CI 1.05–3.30; OR men: 3.19, 1.25–8.12), higher total somatic morbidity (women: 1.08, 1.04–1.12; men: 1.06, 1.02–1.11), higher depression severity (women: 1.34, 1.28–1.40; men: 1.35, 1.27–1.44), and higher loneliness scores (women: 1.19, 1.05–1.36; men: 1.23, 1.03–1.47). Women (but not men) with obesity (Body mass index [BMI] ≥30) had higher odds (1.79, 1.11–2.89) for being complex compared to those with a BMI <25. High oxidative stress measured by derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites in serum was associated with 2.02 (1.09–3.74) higher odds for complexity only in men.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study provides epidemiological evidence on gender differences in prevalence and factors associated with case complexity in middle-aged and older adults. Moreover, this study adds to the holistic understanding of complexity by identifying novel variables linked to complexity among middle-aged and older individuals. These factors include loneliness for both genders, and high oxidative stress for men. These findings should be confirmed in future longitudinal studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.6113\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6113\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender-specific factors associated with case complexity in middle-aged and older adults—Evidence from a large population-based study
Objectives
To investigate gender-specific factors associated with case complexity in a population-based sample of middle-aged and older adults using a holistic approach to complexity.
Methods
Data were derived from the 8-year follow-up home visits of the ESTHER study—a German population-based study in middle-aged and older adults. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted for 2932 persons (aged 57–84). Complexity was assessed by the well-established INTERMED for the elderly interview, which uses a holistic approach to the definition of case complexity. The association between various bio-psycho-social variables and case complexity was analyzed using gender-specific logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic factors (age, marital status, education).
Results
Prevalence of complexity was 8.3% with significantly higher prevalence in female (10.6%) compared to male (5.8%) participants (p < 0.001). Variables associated with increased odds for complexity in both, women and men were: being divorced (odds ratio [OR] women: 1.86, 95% CI 1.05–3.30; OR men: 3.19, 1.25–8.12), higher total somatic morbidity (women: 1.08, 1.04–1.12; men: 1.06, 1.02–1.11), higher depression severity (women: 1.34, 1.28–1.40; men: 1.35, 1.27–1.44), and higher loneliness scores (women: 1.19, 1.05–1.36; men: 1.23, 1.03–1.47). Women (but not men) with obesity (Body mass index [BMI] ≥30) had higher odds (1.79, 1.11–2.89) for being complex compared to those with a BMI <25. High oxidative stress measured by derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites in serum was associated with 2.02 (1.09–3.74) higher odds for complexity only in men.
Conclusions
This study provides epidemiological evidence on gender differences in prevalence and factors associated with case complexity in middle-aged and older adults. Moreover, this study adds to the holistic understanding of complexity by identifying novel variables linked to complexity among middle-aged and older individuals. These factors include loneliness for both genders, and high oxidative stress for men. These findings should be confirmed in future longitudinal studies.
期刊介绍:
The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers.
The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.