原代骨骼肌细胞离体传代对骨骼肌工程学的影响

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Olga M Wroblewski, Christopher S Kennedy, Emmanuel E Vega-Soto, Celeste E Forester, Eileen Y Su, Matthew H Nguyen, Paul S Cederna, Lisa M Larkin
{"title":"原代骨骼肌细胞离体传代对骨骼肌工程学的影响","authors":"Olga M Wroblewski, Christopher S Kennedy, Emmanuel E Vega-Soto, Celeste E Forester, Eileen Y Su, Matthew H Nguyen, Paul S Cederna, Lisa M Larkin","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEA.2024.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is a clinical state that results in impaired skeletal muscle function. Engineered skeletal muscle can serve as a treatment for VML. Currently, large biopsies are required to achieve the cells necessary for the fabrication of engineered muscle, leading to donor-site morbidity. Amplification of cell numbers using cell passaging may increase the usefulness of a single muscle biopsy for engineering muscle tissue. In this study, we evaluated the impact of passaging cells obtained from donor muscle tissue by analyzing characteristics of <i>in vitro</i> cellular growth and tissue-engineered skeletal muscle unit (SMU) structure and function. Human skeletal muscle cell isolates from three separate donors (P0-Control) were compared with cells passaged once (P1), twice (P2), or three times (P3) by monitoring SMU force production and determining muscle content and structure using immunohistochemistry. Data indicated that passaging decreased the number of satellite cells and increased the population doubling time. P1 SMUs had slightly greater contractile force and P2 SMUs showed statistically significant greater force production compared with P0 SMUs with no change in SMU muscle content. In conclusion, human skeletal muscle cells can be passaged twice without negatively impacting SMU muscle content or contractile function, providing the opportunity to potentially create larger SMUs from smaller biopsies, thereby producing clinically relevant sized grafts to aid in VML repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":56375,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering Part A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Passaging Primary Skeletal Muscle Cell Isolates on the Engineering of Skeletal Muscle.\",\"authors\":\"Olga M Wroblewski, Christopher S Kennedy, Emmanuel E Vega-Soto, Celeste E Forester, Eileen Y Su, Matthew H Nguyen, Paul S Cederna, Lisa M Larkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ten.TEA.2024.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is a clinical state that results in impaired skeletal muscle function. Engineered skeletal muscle can serve as a treatment for VML. Currently, large biopsies are required to achieve the cells necessary for the fabrication of engineered muscle, leading to donor-site morbidity. Amplification of cell numbers using cell passaging may increase the usefulness of a single muscle biopsy for engineering muscle tissue. In this study, we evaluated the impact of passaging cells obtained from donor muscle tissue by analyzing characteristics of <i>in vitro</i> cellular growth and tissue-engineered skeletal muscle unit (SMU) structure and function. Human skeletal muscle cell isolates from three separate donors (P0-Control) were compared with cells passaged once (P1), twice (P2), or three times (P3) by monitoring SMU force production and determining muscle content and structure using immunohistochemistry. Data indicated that passaging decreased the number of satellite cells and increased the population doubling time. P1 SMUs had slightly greater contractile force and P2 SMUs showed statistically significant greater force production compared with P0 SMUs with no change in SMU muscle content. In conclusion, human skeletal muscle cells can be passaged twice without negatively impacting SMU muscle content or contractile function, providing the opportunity to potentially create larger SMUs from smaller biopsies, thereby producing clinically relevant sized grafts to aid in VML repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tissue Engineering Part A\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tissue Engineering Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2024.0044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering Part A","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2024.0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌肉体积损失(VML)是一种导致骨骼肌功能受损的临床状态。工程骨骼肌可作为 VML 的治疗方法。目前,为了获得制造人造肌肉所需的细胞,需要进行大量活组织切片检查,这导致了供体部位的发病率。利用细胞传代来增加细胞数量可提高单次肌肉活检对工程肌肉组织的有用性。在这项研究中,我们通过分析体外细胞生长的特点以及组织工程骨骼肌单位(SMU)的结构和功能,评估了从供体肌肉组织中获得的细胞传代的影响。通过监测SMU的产力并使用免疫组化方法确定肌肉含量和结构,将来自三个不同供体的人类骨骼肌细胞分离物(P0-对照组)与传代一次(P1)、两次(P2)或三次(P3)的细胞进行比较。数据显示,传代减少了卫星细胞的数量,增加了细胞群的倍增时间。与 P0 SMU 相比,P1 SMU 的收缩力略大于 P0 SMU,而 P2 SMU 的收缩力显著大于 P0 SMU,但 SMU 的肌肉含量没有变化。总之,人类骨骼肌细胞可以进行两次传代,而不会对SMU肌肉含量或收缩功能产生负面影响,从而有可能从较小的活检组织中制造出更大的SMU,从而生产出临床相关大小的移植物来帮助VML修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Passaging Primary Skeletal Muscle Cell Isolates on the Engineering of Skeletal Muscle.

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is a clinical state that results in impaired skeletal muscle function. Engineered skeletal muscle can serve as a treatment for VML. Currently, large biopsies are required to achieve the cells necessary for the fabrication of engineered muscle, leading to donor-site morbidity. Amplification of cell numbers using cell passaging may increase the usefulness of a single muscle biopsy for engineering muscle tissue. In this study, we evaluated the impact of passaging cells obtained from donor muscle tissue by analyzing characteristics of in vitro cellular growth and tissue-engineered skeletal muscle unit (SMU) structure and function. Human skeletal muscle cell isolates from three separate donors (P0-Control) were compared with cells passaged once (P1), twice (P2), or three times (P3) by monitoring SMU force production and determining muscle content and structure using immunohistochemistry. Data indicated that passaging decreased the number of satellite cells and increased the population doubling time. P1 SMUs had slightly greater contractile force and P2 SMUs showed statistically significant greater force production compared with P0 SMUs with no change in SMU muscle content. In conclusion, human skeletal muscle cells can be passaged twice without negatively impacting SMU muscle content or contractile function, providing the opportunity to potentially create larger SMUs from smaller biopsies, thereby producing clinically relevant sized grafts to aid in VML repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering Part A
Tissue Engineering Part A Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering is the preeminent, biomedical journal advancing the field with cutting-edge research and applications that repair or regenerate portions or whole tissues. This multidisciplinary journal brings together the principles of engineering and life sciences in the creation of artificial tissues and regenerative medicine. Tissue Engineering is divided into three parts, providing a central forum for groundbreaking scientific research and developments of clinical applications from leading experts in the field that will enable the functional replacement of tissues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信