"嗡嗡声环节教学的效果和医学生的感知:一项学术干预研究"。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1152/advan.00169.2023
Vibha Gangwar, Pooja Ramakant, Vimala Venkatesh, Saumyendra Vikram Singh, Amita Singh
{"title":"\"嗡嗡声环节教学的效果和医学生的感知:一项学术干预研究\"。","authors":"Vibha Gangwar, Pooja Ramakant, Vimala Venkatesh, Saumyendra Vikram Singh, Amita Singh","doi":"10.1152/advan.00169.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This interventional study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of buzz session teaching in large groups and assess undergraduate medical students' perceptions of the buzz session teaching method. The study involved 100 first-year medical students divided into two groups, i.e., <i>group I</i> as \"buzz first\" and <i>group II</i> as \"didactic first\" comprising 50 students each. The topic \"Physiology of the Cerebellum\" was taught to <i>group I</i> through a buzz session and to <i>group II</i> through a didactic lecture. After a week, <i>group I</i> received a didactic lecture on the topic \"Anterolateral Pathway in the Spinal Cord,\" whereas <i>group II</i> was taught the same by a buzz session. The students of both groups underwent a multiple choice question exam related to the taught topic immediately and again after 15 days of the teaching session. All students were provided feedback on a five-point Likert scale for the buzz session. According to students' perceptions, buzz sessions boosted communication skills and confidence levels by 94.8% and 96.3%, respectively. Of the students, 93.7% felt that the buzz session helped them retain more information and 94.1% thought they made the classroom environment more lively. More buzz sessions were desired by 94.8% of the participants. There was no difference in the marks gained for the acquired topics using buzz sessions and didactic lectures as teaching methods (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The students scored more marks in the tests taken after the buzz session than after the didactic lecture at 15 days of instruction (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The study concluded that students enjoyed the buzz session teaching method. The buzz session increased short-term retention.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In this current interventional study, we assessed the effectiveness of a buzz session as a novel teaching tool for large-group physiology instruction in first-year undergraduate medical students. Furthermore, we assessed student responses to see how the buzz session was perceived. Experimental evidence indicates that the buzz sessions led to greater retention after 15 days than the didactic lecture approach for physiology teaching in a preclinical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"609-615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of buzz session teaching and perception among medical students: an academic interventional study.\",\"authors\":\"Vibha Gangwar, Pooja Ramakant, Vimala Venkatesh, Saumyendra Vikram Singh, Amita Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00169.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This interventional study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of buzz session teaching in large groups and assess undergraduate medical students' perceptions of the buzz session teaching method. The study involved 100 first-year medical students divided into two groups, i.e., <i>group I</i> as \\\"buzz first\\\" and <i>group II</i> as \\\"didactic first\\\" comprising 50 students each. The topic \\\"Physiology of the Cerebellum\\\" was taught to <i>group I</i> through a buzz session and to <i>group II</i> through a didactic lecture. After a week, <i>group I</i> received a didactic lecture on the topic \\\"Anterolateral Pathway in the Spinal Cord,\\\" whereas <i>group II</i> was taught the same by a buzz session. The students of both groups underwent a multiple choice question exam related to the taught topic immediately and again after 15 days of the teaching session. All students were provided feedback on a five-point Likert scale for the buzz session. According to students' perceptions, buzz sessions boosted communication skills and confidence levels by 94.8% and 96.3%, respectively. Of the students, 93.7% felt that the buzz session helped them retain more information and 94.1% thought they made the classroom environment more lively. More buzz sessions were desired by 94.8% of the participants. There was no difference in the marks gained for the acquired topics using buzz sessions and didactic lectures as teaching methods (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The students scored more marks in the tests taken after the buzz session than after the didactic lecture at 15 days of instruction (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The study concluded that students enjoyed the buzz session teaching method. The buzz session increased short-term retention.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In this current interventional study, we assessed the effectiveness of a buzz session as a novel teaching tool for large-group physiology instruction in first-year undergraduate medical students. Furthermore, we assessed student responses to see how the buzz session was perceived. Experimental evidence indicates that the buzz sessions led to greater retention after 15 days than the didactic lecture approach for physiology teaching in a preclinical context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"609-615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00169.2023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00169.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项干预性研究旨在评估 "嗡嗡课程 "在大班教学中的效果,以及本科医学生对 "嗡嗡课程 "教学法的看法。研究涉及 100 名医学学士学位一年级学生,分为两组,即 Buzz Session(第一组)和授课(第二组)。第一组学生通过 Buzz session 学习 "小脑生理学",第二组学生通过说教式讲座学习 "小脑生理学"。一周后,第一组学生接受了关于 "脊髓前外侧通路 "的教学讲座,而第二组学生则接受了 Buzz 课程。培训课程结束后,两组学生都立即通过 MCQ 考试对每个主题进行了评估,并在 15 天后再次进行评估。所有学生都获得了针对 Buzz 课程的 5 点李克特量表反馈。根据学生的看法,Buzz 课程分别提高了 94.8% 和 96.3% 的沟通技巧和自信水平。93.7%的学生认为 Buzz 环节有助于他们保留更多信息,94.1%的学生认为 Buzz 环节使课堂氛围更加活跃。94.8%的参与者希望有更多的 "嗡嗡 "课程。采用不同的教学方法,所学内容的分数没有明显差异(P> 0.05)。嗡嗡课程结束后,在 15 天的教学中,测试分数明显高于说课分数(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of buzz session teaching and perception among medical students: an academic interventional study.

This interventional study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of buzz session teaching in large groups and assess undergraduate medical students' perceptions of the buzz session teaching method. The study involved 100 first-year medical students divided into two groups, i.e., group I as "buzz first" and group II as "didactic first" comprising 50 students each. The topic "Physiology of the Cerebellum" was taught to group I through a buzz session and to group II through a didactic lecture. After a week, group I received a didactic lecture on the topic "Anterolateral Pathway in the Spinal Cord," whereas group II was taught the same by a buzz session. The students of both groups underwent a multiple choice question exam related to the taught topic immediately and again after 15 days of the teaching session. All students were provided feedback on a five-point Likert scale for the buzz session. According to students' perceptions, buzz sessions boosted communication skills and confidence levels by 94.8% and 96.3%, respectively. Of the students, 93.7% felt that the buzz session helped them retain more information and 94.1% thought they made the classroom environment more lively. More buzz sessions were desired by 94.8% of the participants. There was no difference in the marks gained for the acquired topics using buzz sessions and didactic lectures as teaching methods (P > 0.05). The students scored more marks in the tests taken after the buzz session than after the didactic lecture at 15 days of instruction (P < 0.05). The study concluded that students enjoyed the buzz session teaching method. The buzz session increased short-term retention.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this current interventional study, we assessed the effectiveness of a buzz session as a novel teaching tool for large-group physiology instruction in first-year undergraduate medical students. Furthermore, we assessed student responses to see how the buzz session was perceived. Experimental evidence indicates that the buzz sessions led to greater retention after 15 days than the didactic lecture approach for physiology teaching in a preclinical context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信