{"title":"利用超声波和 d-二聚体诊断急性主动脉综合征:PROFUNDUS 研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In patients complaining common symptoms such as chest/abdominal/back pain or syncope, acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are rare underlying causes. AAS diagnosis requires urgent advanced aortic imaging (AAI), mostly computed tomography angiography. However, patient selection for AAI poses conflicting risks of misdiagnosis and overtesting.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We assessed the safety and efficiency of a diagnostic protocol integrating clinical data with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and <span>d-</span>dimer (single/age-adjusted cutoff), to select patients for AAI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective study involved 12 Emergency Departments from 5 countries. POCUS findings were integrated with a guideline-compliant clinical score, to define the integrated pre-test probability (iPTP) of AAS. If iPTP was high, urgent AAI was requested. If iPTP was low and <span>d</span>-dimer was negative, AAS was ruled out. Patients were followed for 30 days, to adjudicate outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Within 1979 enrolled patients, 176 (9 %) had an AAS. POCUS led to net reclassification improvement of 20 % (24 %/-4 % for events/non-events, <em>P</em> < 0.001) over clinical score alone. Median time to AAS diagnosis was 60 min if POCUS was positive <em>vs</em> 118 if negative (<em>P</em> = 0.042). Within 941 patients satisfying rule-out criteria, the 30-day incidence of AAS was 0 % (95 % CI, 0–0.41 %); without POCUS, 2 AAS were potentially missed. Protocol rule-out efficiency was 48 % (95 % CI, 46–50 %) and AAI was averted in 41 % of patients. Using age-adjusted <span>d</span>-dimer, rule-out efficiency was 54 % (difference 6 %, 95 % CI, 4–9 %, vs standard cutoff).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The integrated algorithm allowed rapid triage of high-probability patients, while providing safe and efficient rule-out of AAS. Age-adjusted <span>d</span>-dimer maximized efficiency.</div><div><strong>CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:</strong> Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04430400</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50485,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 94-103"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes with ultrasound and d-dimer: the PROFUNDUS study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In patients complaining common symptoms such as chest/abdominal/back pain or syncope, acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are rare underlying causes. AAS diagnosis requires urgent advanced aortic imaging (AAI), mostly computed tomography angiography. However, patient selection for AAI poses conflicting risks of misdiagnosis and overtesting.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We assessed the safety and efficiency of a diagnostic protocol integrating clinical data with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and <span>d-</span>dimer (single/age-adjusted cutoff), to select patients for AAI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective study involved 12 Emergency Departments from 5 countries. POCUS findings were integrated with a guideline-compliant clinical score, to define the integrated pre-test probability (iPTP) of AAS. If iPTP was high, urgent AAI was requested. If iPTP was low and <span>d</span>-dimer was negative, AAS was ruled out. Patients were followed for 30 days, to adjudicate outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Within 1979 enrolled patients, 176 (9 %) had an AAS. POCUS led to net reclassification improvement of 20 % (24 %/-4 % for events/non-events, <em>P</em> < 0.001) over clinical score alone. Median time to AAS diagnosis was 60 min if POCUS was positive <em>vs</em> 118 if negative (<em>P</em> = 0.042). Within 941 patients satisfying rule-out criteria, the 30-day incidence of AAS was 0 % (95 % CI, 0–0.41 %); without POCUS, 2 AAS were potentially missed. Protocol rule-out efficiency was 48 % (95 % CI, 46–50 %) and AAI was averted in 41 % of patients. Using age-adjusted <span>d</span>-dimer, rule-out efficiency was 54 % (difference 6 %, 95 % CI, 4–9 %, vs standard cutoff).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The integrated algorithm allowed rapid triage of high-probability patients, while providing safe and efficient rule-out of AAS. Age-adjusted <span>d</span>-dimer maximized efficiency.</div><div><strong>CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:</strong> Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04430400</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953620524002346\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953620524002346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes with ultrasound and d-dimer: the PROFUNDUS study
Background
In patients complaining common symptoms such as chest/abdominal/back pain or syncope, acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are rare underlying causes. AAS diagnosis requires urgent advanced aortic imaging (AAI), mostly computed tomography angiography. However, patient selection for AAI poses conflicting risks of misdiagnosis and overtesting.
Objectives
We assessed the safety and efficiency of a diagnostic protocol integrating clinical data with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and d-dimer (single/age-adjusted cutoff), to select patients for AAI.
Methods
This prospective study involved 12 Emergency Departments from 5 countries. POCUS findings were integrated with a guideline-compliant clinical score, to define the integrated pre-test probability (iPTP) of AAS. If iPTP was high, urgent AAI was requested. If iPTP was low and d-dimer was negative, AAS was ruled out. Patients were followed for 30 days, to adjudicate outcomes.
Results
Within 1979 enrolled patients, 176 (9 %) had an AAS. POCUS led to net reclassification improvement of 20 % (24 %/-4 % for events/non-events, P < 0.001) over clinical score alone. Median time to AAS diagnosis was 60 min if POCUS was positive vs 118 if negative (P = 0.042). Within 941 patients satisfying rule-out criteria, the 30-day incidence of AAS was 0 % (95 % CI, 0–0.41 %); without POCUS, 2 AAS were potentially missed. Protocol rule-out efficiency was 48 % (95 % CI, 46–50 %) and AAI was averted in 41 % of patients. Using age-adjusted d-dimer, rule-out efficiency was 54 % (difference 6 %, 95 % CI, 4–9 %, vs standard cutoff).
Conclusions
The integrated algorithm allowed rapid triage of high-probability patients, while providing safe and efficient rule-out of AAS. Age-adjusted d-dimer maximized efficiency.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Internal Medicine serves as the official journal of the European Federation of Internal Medicine and is the primary scientific reference for European academic and non-academic internists. It is dedicated to advancing science and practice in internal medicine across Europe. The journal publishes original articles, editorials, reviews, internal medicine flashcards, and other relevant information in the field. Both translational medicine and clinical studies are emphasized. EJIM aspires to be a leading platform for excellent clinical studies, with a focus on enhancing the quality of healthcare in European hospitals.