Jag Sunderram, Alicia Legard, Adriana De Resende, Kathleen Black, Iris G Udasin, Shou-En Lu, Horacio Romero Castillo, Sri Saranya Ravi, Anna E Mullins, Rafael E de la Hoz, David M Rapoport, Indu Ayappa
{"title":"世贸中心救灾人员上气道感觉受损与是否存在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停或慢性鼻炎没有关联。","authors":"Jag Sunderram, Alicia Legard, Adriana De Resende, Kathleen Black, Iris G Udasin, Shou-En Lu, Horacio Romero Castillo, Sri Saranya Ravi, Anna E Mullins, Rafael E de la Hoz, David M Rapoport, Indu Ayappa","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2023-109262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine sensory function of the upper airway in four groups of subjects recruited from the World Trade Centre General Responder Cohort (WTCGRC), with/without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and with/without chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Upper airway sensory function was determined using 2-point discrimination (2-PD) and vibration threshold (VT) in 163 WTCGRC subjects with both OSA and CRS (cases), OSA or CRS alone and without OSA or CRS (controls). Presence of OSA was determined from clinical sleep studies or home sleep testing. Presence of CRS was determined by nasal symptom questionnaire. The relationship between the presence of OSA and CRS and upper airway sensory impairment was assessed using linear regression analysis with each of 2PD and VT sensory threshold values as the dependent variable; OSA, CRS and their interaction were the independent variables. Age, gender and body mass index were covariates in the statistical model. The primary analysis was comparison of OSA+CRS versus controls (no OSA and no CRS) evaluated by linear contrasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in 2-PD or VT in those with OSA+CRS, OSA and CRS alone or controls. However, both 2-PD and VT were significantly higher in the WTCGRC controls compared with values seen in historical controls using the same methodology (median 2-PD 13.0; CI (11.0 to 13.5) vs 10.5; CI (8 to 11); VT: mean±SEM (9.3±0.6 vs 2.2±0.1)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While no differences were found in upper airway sensation between cases of OSA and CRS versus controls in the WTGRC population, there was evidence of impaired upper airway sensation in the WTGRC overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"302-307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of association of impaired upper airway sensation with the presence or absence of obstructive sleep apnoea or chronic rhinosinusitis in World Trade Center responders.\",\"authors\":\"Jag Sunderram, Alicia Legard, Adriana De Resende, Kathleen Black, Iris G Udasin, Shou-En Lu, Horacio Romero Castillo, Sri Saranya Ravi, Anna E Mullins, Rafael E de la Hoz, David M Rapoport, Indu Ayappa\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2023-109262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine sensory function of the upper airway in four groups of subjects recruited from the World Trade Centre General Responder Cohort (WTCGRC), with/without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and with/without chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Upper airway sensory function was determined using 2-point discrimination (2-PD) and vibration threshold (VT) in 163 WTCGRC subjects with both OSA and CRS (cases), OSA or CRS alone and without OSA or CRS (controls). Presence of OSA was determined from clinical sleep studies or home sleep testing. Presence of CRS was determined by nasal symptom questionnaire. The relationship between the presence of OSA and CRS and upper airway sensory impairment was assessed using linear regression analysis with each of 2PD and VT sensory threshold values as the dependent variable; OSA, CRS and their interaction were the independent variables. Age, gender and body mass index were covariates in the statistical model. The primary analysis was comparison of OSA+CRS versus controls (no OSA and no CRS) evaluated by linear contrasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in 2-PD or VT in those with OSA+CRS, OSA and CRS alone or controls. However, both 2-PD and VT were significantly higher in the WTCGRC controls compared with values seen in historical controls using the same methodology (median 2-PD 13.0; CI (11.0 to 13.5) vs 10.5; CI (8 to 11); VT: mean±SEM (9.3±0.6 vs 2.2±0.1)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While no differences were found in upper airway sensation between cases of OSA and CRS versus controls in the WTGRC population, there was evidence of impaired upper airway sensation in the WTGRC overall.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"302-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239276/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109262\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:检查世界贸易中心普通响应者队列(WTCGRC)中四组受试者的上气道感觉功能:研究从世贸中心普通响应者队列(WTCGRC)中招募的四组受试者的上气道感觉功能,这四组受试者有/无阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA),有/无慢性鼻窦炎(CRS):采用两点辨别(2-PD)和振动阈值(VT)测定 163 名同时患有 OSA 和 CRS(病例)、仅患有 OSA 或 CRS 以及未患有 OSA 或 CRS(对照组)的 WTCGRC 受试者的上气道感觉功能。是否患有 OSA 由临床睡眠研究或家庭睡眠测试确定。是否存在CRS通过鼻部症状问卷调查确定。以 2PD 和 VT 感觉阈值为因变量,OSA、CRS 及其交互作用为自变量,通过线性回归分析评估 OSA 和 CRS 的存在与上气道感觉障碍之间的关系。年龄、性别和体重指数是统计模型中的协变量。主要分析是通过线性对比评估 OSA+CRS 与对照组(无 OSA 和无 CRS)的比较:结果:OSA+CRS患者、单纯OSA和CRS患者或对照组的2-PD或VT没有差异。然而,与使用相同方法的历史对照组相比,WTCGRC 对照组的 2-PD 和 VT 值明显更高(2-PD 中位数为 13.0;CI(11.0 至 13.5)vs 10.5;CI(8 至 11);VT:mean±SEM(9.3±0.6 vs 2.2±0.1)):结论:虽然在WTGRC人群中,OSA和CRS病例与对照组在上气道感觉方面没有发现差异,但有证据表明WTGRC总体上存在上气道感觉受损的情况。
Lack of association of impaired upper airway sensation with the presence or absence of obstructive sleep apnoea or chronic rhinosinusitis in World Trade Center responders.
Objective: Examine sensory function of the upper airway in four groups of subjects recruited from the World Trade Centre General Responder Cohort (WTCGRC), with/without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and with/without chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
Methods: Upper airway sensory function was determined using 2-point discrimination (2-PD) and vibration threshold (VT) in 163 WTCGRC subjects with both OSA and CRS (cases), OSA or CRS alone and without OSA or CRS (controls). Presence of OSA was determined from clinical sleep studies or home sleep testing. Presence of CRS was determined by nasal symptom questionnaire. The relationship between the presence of OSA and CRS and upper airway sensory impairment was assessed using linear regression analysis with each of 2PD and VT sensory threshold values as the dependent variable; OSA, CRS and their interaction were the independent variables. Age, gender and body mass index were covariates in the statistical model. The primary analysis was comparison of OSA+CRS versus controls (no OSA and no CRS) evaluated by linear contrasts.
Results: There were no differences in 2-PD or VT in those with OSA+CRS, OSA and CRS alone or controls. However, both 2-PD and VT were significantly higher in the WTCGRC controls compared with values seen in historical controls using the same methodology (median 2-PD 13.0; CI (11.0 to 13.5) vs 10.5; CI (8 to 11); VT: mean±SEM (9.3±0.6 vs 2.2±0.1)).
Conclusion: While no differences were found in upper airway sensation between cases of OSA and CRS versus controls in the WTGRC population, there was evidence of impaired upper airway sensation in the WTGRC overall.
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.