津巴布韦非正规乳制品行业中牧场卫生和处理方法对微生物安全概况的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
S. Chimuti , D.T. Mugadza , V. Ntuli , P.M.K. Njage
{"title":"津巴布韦非正规乳制品行业中牧场卫生和处理方法对微生物安全概况的影响。","authors":"S. Chimuti ,&nbsp;D.T. Mugadza ,&nbsp;V. Ntuli ,&nbsp;P.M.K. Njage","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current study assessed (i) the microbiological safety level profiles (MSLPs) of milkmen’s hands and milking containers and (ii) the influence of hygiene and handling practices on MSLPs of raw and cultured milk, from six informal dairy farms in Zimbabwe. Interviews and direct observations were carried out during the assessment of hygiene and handling practices at six farms designated A to F. Microbiological criteria of the following six microbiological parameters: Total Bacterial Counts (TBCs), Coliform Counts (CCs), Total <em>Escherichia coli</em> Counts (TECs), <em>Salmonella</em> spp., <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> and <em>Klebsiella pneumonia</em>, were used to determine contamination level (CL) at four different critical sampling locations (CSLs). The CSLs were raw milk (CSL1), cultured milk (CSL2), milkmen’s hands (CSL3), and milking containers (CSL4). The microbiological criteria of the six microbiological parameters were used to score CLs as: intolerable (0), poor to average (1), average (2), and good (3). MSLPs at each CSL for the six farms were computed based on the CL scores to a maximum score of 18. A total of 192 samples were collected and analyzed. <em>Salmonella</em> spp. and <em>L. monocytogenes</em> were not detected at all the CSLs. All the farms failed to achieve a maximum MSLP score of 18 at all the CSLs. The relationship between MSLPs and hygiene and handling practices was tested using point-biserial correlation coefficients. The correlation study revealed that handling and hygiene practices (such as the duration between milking and storage, the type of milking container utilized at farms, the frequency of cleaning the milking parlor, the water source for hand and equipment washing, and the use of hand sanitizers) generally influenced the MSLPs on the farms. Both training and improvement in infrastructure are needed to improve the quality of milk and its products produced and sold in the informal value chain in Zimbabwe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000978/pdfft?md5=377882658b658256bf4420d9e3fc04de&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000978-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution of Farm-level Hygiene and Handling Practices to Microbial Safety Profiles in the Informal Dairy Sector in Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"S. Chimuti ,&nbsp;D.T. Mugadza ,&nbsp;V. Ntuli ,&nbsp;P.M.K. Njage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The current study assessed (i) the microbiological safety level profiles (MSLPs) of milkmen’s hands and milking containers and (ii) the influence of hygiene and handling practices on MSLPs of raw and cultured milk, from six informal dairy farms in Zimbabwe. Interviews and direct observations were carried out during the assessment of hygiene and handling practices at six farms designated A to F. Microbiological criteria of the following six microbiological parameters: Total Bacterial Counts (TBCs), Coliform Counts (CCs), Total <em>Escherichia coli</em> Counts (TECs), <em>Salmonella</em> spp., <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> and <em>Klebsiella pneumonia</em>, were used to determine contamination level (CL) at four different critical sampling locations (CSLs). The CSLs were raw milk (CSL1), cultured milk (CSL2), milkmen’s hands (CSL3), and milking containers (CSL4). The microbiological criteria of the six microbiological parameters were used to score CLs as: intolerable (0), poor to average (1), average (2), and good (3). MSLPs at each CSL for the six farms were computed based on the CL scores to a maximum score of 18. A total of 192 samples were collected and analyzed. <em>Salmonella</em> spp. and <em>L. monocytogenes</em> were not detected at all the CSLs. All the farms failed to achieve a maximum MSLP score of 18 at all the CSLs. The relationship between MSLPs and hygiene and handling practices was tested using point-biserial correlation coefficients. The correlation study revealed that handling and hygiene practices (such as the duration between milking and storage, the type of milking container utilized at farms, the frequency of cleaning the milking parlor, the water source for hand and equipment washing, and the use of hand sanitizers) generally influenced the MSLPs on the farms. Both training and improvement in infrastructure are needed to improve the quality of milk and its products produced and sold in the informal value chain in Zimbabwe.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000978/pdfft?md5=377882658b658256bf4420d9e3fc04de&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000978-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000978\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了 (i) 挤奶员的手和挤奶容器的微生物安全等级概况 (MSLP);(ii) 卫生和处理方法对津巴布韦六个非正规奶牛场的原料奶和培养奶的微生物安全等级概况的影响。在对指定为 A 至 F 的六个牧场的卫生和处理方法进行评估期间,进行了访谈和直接观察:细菌总数 (TBC)、大肠菌群总数 (CC)、大肠杆菌总数 (TEC)、沙门氏菌属、单核细胞增生李斯特菌和肺炎克雷伯氏菌,用于确定四个不同关键采样点 (CSL) 的污染水平 (CLs)。这些关键采样点分别是生奶(CSL1)、培养奶(CSL2)、挤奶工的手(CSL3)和挤奶容器(CSL4)。根据六项微生物参数的微生物标准,将挤奶容器评为:不能容忍(0)、差至一般(1)、一般(2)和好(3)。根据 CL 评分计算出六个农场每个 CSL 的 MSLPs,最高分为 18 分。共收集并分析了 192 个样本。所有 CSL 均未检测到沙门氏菌属和单核细胞增多性酵母菌。所有 CSL 的 MSLP 最高分均未达到 18 分。使用点-阶梯相关系数检验了 MSLPs 与卫生和处理方法之间的关系。相关研究表明,处理和卫生习惯(如挤奶和储奶之间的间隔时间、牧场使用的挤奶容器类型、清洗挤奶厅的频率、洗手和清洗设备的水源以及手部消毒剂的使用)对牧场的 MSLPs 有普遍影响。要提高津巴布韦非正规价值链中生产和销售的牛奶及其产品的质量,需要开展培训和改善基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contribution of Farm-level Hygiene and Handling Practices to Microbial Safety Profiles in the Informal Dairy Sector in Zimbabwe

The current study assessed (i) the microbiological safety level profiles (MSLPs) of milkmen’s hands and milking containers and (ii) the influence of hygiene and handling practices on MSLPs of raw and cultured milk, from six informal dairy farms in Zimbabwe. Interviews and direct observations were carried out during the assessment of hygiene and handling practices at six farms designated A to F. Microbiological criteria of the following six microbiological parameters: Total Bacterial Counts (TBCs), Coliform Counts (CCs), Total Escherichia coli Counts (TECs), Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Klebsiella pneumonia, were used to determine contamination level (CL) at four different critical sampling locations (CSLs). The CSLs were raw milk (CSL1), cultured milk (CSL2), milkmen’s hands (CSL3), and milking containers (CSL4). The microbiological criteria of the six microbiological parameters were used to score CLs as: intolerable (0), poor to average (1), average (2), and good (3). MSLPs at each CSL for the six farms were computed based on the CL scores to a maximum score of 18. A total of 192 samples were collected and analyzed. Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes were not detected at all the CSLs. All the farms failed to achieve a maximum MSLP score of 18 at all the CSLs. The relationship between MSLPs and hygiene and handling practices was tested using point-biserial correlation coefficients. The correlation study revealed that handling and hygiene practices (such as the duration between milking and storage, the type of milking container utilized at farms, the frequency of cleaning the milking parlor, the water source for hand and equipment washing, and the use of hand sanitizers) generally influenced the MSLPs on the farms. Both training and improvement in infrastructure are needed to improve the quality of milk and its products produced and sold in the informal value chain in Zimbabwe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信