瘢痕疙瘩特性对治疗效果的影响,系统性综述。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256
Vazula Bekkers, Paul Barsoum, Qi Yin, Frank Niessen, Paul van Zuijlen, Oren Lapid, Martijn van Doorn, Albert Wolkerstorfer
{"title":"瘢痕疙瘩特性对治疗效果的影响,系统性综述。","authors":"Vazula Bekkers, Paul Barsoum, Qi Yin, Frank Niessen, Paul van Zuijlen, Oren Lapid, Martijn van Doorn, Albert Wolkerstorfer","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids ( n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder ( n = 3), larger keloids ( n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score ( n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence ( n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"913-921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Keloid Properties on Treatment Efficacy: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Vazula Bekkers, Paul Barsoum, Qi Yin, Frank Niessen, Paul van Zuijlen, Oren Lapid, Martijn van Doorn, Albert Wolkerstorfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids ( n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder ( n = 3), larger keloids ( n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score ( n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence ( n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"913-921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在随机研究中,瘢痕疙瘩的治疗效果差异很大。然而,目前还没有系统性综述来评估不同瘢痕疙瘩特性对疗效的影响:确定可能影响疗效的临床相关瘢痕疙瘩特性:进行电子数据库检索。两名审稿人独立选择随机对照试验(RCT),并使用 Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 工具进行方法学质量评估:结果:共筛选出 1520 项研究,其中包括 16 项随机对照试验,涉及 1113 名患者。作者发现,年龄较大的瘢痕疙瘩(3 例)、位于胸部、四肢、耳廓和肩部的瘢痕疙瘩(3 例)、较大的瘢痕疙瘩(2 例)、基线温哥华瘢痕量表评分较低(1 例)以及有复发史的瘢痕疙瘩(1 例)的疗效较差。总体而言,大多数研究的偏倚风险较高:结论:只有少数研究专门针对瘢痕疙瘩的特性,这使得研究间的比较具有挑战性。作者的研究结果表明,瘢痕疙瘩的位置、治疗前持续时间、大小、复发史和严重程度是影响疗效的临床相关瘢痕疙瘩属性。进一步的研究对于证实作者的发现、建立与临床相关的瘢痕疙瘩分类以及最终开发出考虑到这些特性的循证治疗算法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Keloid Properties on Treatment Efficacy: A Systematic Review.

Background: The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy.

Objective: To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy.

Materials and methods: An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.

Results: One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids ( n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder ( n = 3), larger keloids ( n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score ( n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence ( n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias.

Conclusion: Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信