Elijah Lackey, Jeffrey Shen, Aditya Sharma, Christopher Eckstein
{"title":"神经肉样瘤病的活检之外:血液和脑脊液生物标志物综述","authors":"Elijah Lackey, Jeffrey Shen, Aditya Sharma, Christopher Eckstein","doi":"10.1016/j.jneuroim.2024.578394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neurosarcoidosis, a rare granulomatous disease, causes inflammation and damage to the central nervous system (CNS). A major diagnostic challenge in neurosarcoidosis is the absence of well-defined biomarkers. The need for biopsy to make the diagnosis can lead to delays and misdiagnosis if histopathology is inaccessible or indeterminate, highlighting the need for more accessible diagnostic indicators.</p><p>The current gold standard for a “definite” neurosarcoidosis diagnosis requires biopsy of CNS tissue revealing non-caseating granulomas. However, such biopsies are inherently invasive and carry associated procedural risks. Notably, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), commonly associated with systemic sarcoidosis, is recognized as a poor biomarker for neurosarcoidosis due to its lack of accuracy in the context of CNS involvement. Furthermore, imaging in neurosarcoidosis, while widely utilized and important for narrowing the diagnosis, lacks specificity.</p><p>Decades of research have yielded molecular and immunologic biomarkers—soluble interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), serum amyloid A1, the CD4/CD8 ratio, neopterin, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)—that hold potential for improving diagnostic accuracy. However, these biomarkers are not yet established in clinical care as they may be difficult to obtain and are derived from small studies. They also suffer from a lack of specificity against other inflammatory and infectious central nervous system diseases. New biomarkers are needed for use alongside those previously discovered to improve diagnosis of this rare disease.</p><p>This review synthesizes existing literature on neurosarcoidosis biomarkers, aiming to establish a foundation for further research in this evolving field. It also consolidates information on biomarkers of systemic sarcoidosis such as IL-8 and soluble CD40L that have not yet been studied in neurosarcoidosis but hold potential as markers of CNS disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroimmunology","volume":"393 ","pages":"Article 578394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond biopsy for neurosarcoidosis: A review of blood and CSF biomarkers\",\"authors\":\"Elijah Lackey, Jeffrey Shen, Aditya Sharma, Christopher Eckstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneuroim.2024.578394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Neurosarcoidosis, a rare granulomatous disease, causes inflammation and damage to the central nervous system (CNS). A major diagnostic challenge in neurosarcoidosis is the absence of well-defined biomarkers. The need for biopsy to make the diagnosis can lead to delays and misdiagnosis if histopathology is inaccessible or indeterminate, highlighting the need for more accessible diagnostic indicators.</p><p>The current gold standard for a “definite” neurosarcoidosis diagnosis requires biopsy of CNS tissue revealing non-caseating granulomas. However, such biopsies are inherently invasive and carry associated procedural risks. Notably, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), commonly associated with systemic sarcoidosis, is recognized as a poor biomarker for neurosarcoidosis due to its lack of accuracy in the context of CNS involvement. Furthermore, imaging in neurosarcoidosis, while widely utilized and important for narrowing the diagnosis, lacks specificity.</p><p>Decades of research have yielded molecular and immunologic biomarkers—soluble interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), serum amyloid A1, the CD4/CD8 ratio, neopterin, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)—that hold potential for improving diagnostic accuracy. However, these biomarkers are not yet established in clinical care as they may be difficult to obtain and are derived from small studies. They also suffer from a lack of specificity against other inflammatory and infectious central nervous system diseases. New biomarkers are needed for use alongside those previously discovered to improve diagnosis of this rare disease.</p><p>This review synthesizes existing literature on neurosarcoidosis biomarkers, aiming to establish a foundation for further research in this evolving field. It also consolidates information on biomarkers of systemic sarcoidosis such as IL-8 and soluble CD40L that have not yet been studied in neurosarcoidosis but hold potential as markers of CNS disease.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neuroimmunology\",\"volume\":\"393 \",\"pages\":\"Article 578394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neuroimmunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165572824001127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroimmunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165572824001127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond biopsy for neurosarcoidosis: A review of blood and CSF biomarkers
Neurosarcoidosis, a rare granulomatous disease, causes inflammation and damage to the central nervous system (CNS). A major diagnostic challenge in neurosarcoidosis is the absence of well-defined biomarkers. The need for biopsy to make the diagnosis can lead to delays and misdiagnosis if histopathology is inaccessible or indeterminate, highlighting the need for more accessible diagnostic indicators.
The current gold standard for a “definite” neurosarcoidosis diagnosis requires biopsy of CNS tissue revealing non-caseating granulomas. However, such biopsies are inherently invasive and carry associated procedural risks. Notably, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), commonly associated with systemic sarcoidosis, is recognized as a poor biomarker for neurosarcoidosis due to its lack of accuracy in the context of CNS involvement. Furthermore, imaging in neurosarcoidosis, while widely utilized and important for narrowing the diagnosis, lacks specificity.
Decades of research have yielded molecular and immunologic biomarkers—soluble interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), serum amyloid A1, the CD4/CD8 ratio, neopterin, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)—that hold potential for improving diagnostic accuracy. However, these biomarkers are not yet established in clinical care as they may be difficult to obtain and are derived from small studies. They also suffer from a lack of specificity against other inflammatory and infectious central nervous system diseases. New biomarkers are needed for use alongside those previously discovered to improve diagnosis of this rare disease.
This review synthesizes existing literature on neurosarcoidosis biomarkers, aiming to establish a foundation for further research in this evolving field. It also consolidates information on biomarkers of systemic sarcoidosis such as IL-8 and soluble CD40L that have not yet been studied in neurosarcoidosis but hold potential as markers of CNS disease.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroimmunology affords a forum for the publication of works applying immunologic methodology to the furtherance of the neurological sciences. Studies on all branches of the neurosciences, particularly fundamental and applied neurobiology, neurology, neuropathology, neurochemistry, neurovirology, neuroendocrinology, neuromuscular research, neuropharmacology and psychology, which involve either immunologic methodology (e.g. immunocytochemistry) or fundamental immunology (e.g. antibody and lymphocyte assays), are considered for publication.