碳纤维定制动态矫形器的使用和设计对下肢创伤患者压力中心进展和感觉顺畅度的影响

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sapna Sharma , Kirsten M. Anderson , Molly S. Pacha , Kierra J. Falbo , Clare Severe , Andrew H. Hansen , Brad D. Hendershot , Jason M. Wilken , CARBon Fiber Orthosis Research Network (CARBON)
{"title":"碳纤维定制动态矫形器的使用和设计对下肢创伤患者压力中心进展和感觉顺畅度的影响","authors":"Sapna Sharma ,&nbsp;Kirsten M. Anderson ,&nbsp;Molly S. Pacha ,&nbsp;Kierra J. Falbo ,&nbsp;Clare Severe ,&nbsp;Andrew H. Hansen ,&nbsp;Brad D. Hendershot ,&nbsp;Jason M. Wilken ,&nbsp;CARBon Fiber Orthosis Research Network (CARBON)","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Carbon-fiber custom dynamic orthoses are used to improve gait and limb function following lower limb trauma in specialty centers. However, the effects of commercially available orthoses on center of pressure progression and patient perception of orthosis smoothness during walking are poorly understood.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 16 participants with a unilateral lower extremity traumatic injury underwent gait analysis when walking without an orthosis, and while wearing monolithic and modular devices, in a randomized order. Device alignment, stiffness, participant rating of perceived device smoothness, center of pressure velocity, and ankle zero moment crossing were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The modular device was approximately twice as stiff as the monolithic device. Alignment, smoothness ratings, peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity, and zero moment crossing were not different between study devices. The time to peak center of pressure velocity occurred significantly later for the modular device compared to the monolithic and no orthosis conditions, with large effect sizes observed.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Commercially available orthoses commonly used to treat limb trauma affect the timing of center of pressure progression relative to walking without an orthosis. Despite multiple design differences, monolithic and modular orthoses included in this study did not differ with respect to other measures of center of pressure progression. Perceived smoothness ratings were approximately 40% greater with the study orthoses as compared to previous studies in specialty centers, which may be due to a more gradual center of pressure progression, as indicted by lower peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity with both study orthoses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis use and design on center of pressure progression and perceived smoothness in individuals with lower limb trauma\",\"authors\":\"Sapna Sharma ,&nbsp;Kirsten M. Anderson ,&nbsp;Molly S. Pacha ,&nbsp;Kierra J. Falbo ,&nbsp;Clare Severe ,&nbsp;Andrew H. Hansen ,&nbsp;Brad D. Hendershot ,&nbsp;Jason M. Wilken ,&nbsp;CARBon Fiber Orthosis Research Network (CARBON)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Carbon-fiber custom dynamic orthoses are used to improve gait and limb function following lower limb trauma in specialty centers. However, the effects of commercially available orthoses on center of pressure progression and patient perception of orthosis smoothness during walking are poorly understood.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 16 participants with a unilateral lower extremity traumatic injury underwent gait analysis when walking without an orthosis, and while wearing monolithic and modular devices, in a randomized order. Device alignment, stiffness, participant rating of perceived device smoothness, center of pressure velocity, and ankle zero moment crossing were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The modular device was approximately twice as stiff as the monolithic device. Alignment, smoothness ratings, peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity, and zero moment crossing were not different between study devices. The time to peak center of pressure velocity occurred significantly later for the modular device compared to the monolithic and no orthosis conditions, with large effect sizes observed.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Commercially available orthoses commonly used to treat limb trauma affect the timing of center of pressure progression relative to walking without an orthosis. Despite multiple design differences, monolithic and modular orthoses included in this study did not differ with respect to other measures of center of pressure progression. Perceived smoothness ratings were approximately 40% greater with the study orthoses as compared to previous studies in specialty centers, which may be due to a more gradual center of pressure progression, as indicted by lower peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity with both study orthoses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001165\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景专科中心使用碳纤维定制动态矫形器来改善下肢创伤后的步态和肢体功能。方法 共有 16 名单侧下肢外伤患者在未佩戴矫形器、佩戴整体式和模块式矫形器的情况下进行了步态分析。对矫形器的排列、硬度、参与者对矫形器平滑度的评价、压力中心速度和踝关节零力矩交叉进行了评估。对齐度、平滑度评分、压力中心速度峰值幅度和零力矩交叉点在研究设备之间没有差异。模块化装置达到压力中心速度峰值的时间明显晚于整体式装置和无矫形器条件下的时间,且观察到较大的效应大小。尽管在设计上存在多种差异,但本研究中的整体式矫形器和模块式矫形器在压力中心进展的其他测量方面并无不同。与之前在专科中心进行的研究相比,使用本研究中的矫形器所获得的平滑感评分要高出约 40%,这可能是由于压力中心的发展更为渐进,而这两种矫形器的压力中心速度峰值较低也说明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis use and design on center of pressure progression and perceived smoothness in individuals with lower limb trauma

Background

Carbon-fiber custom dynamic orthoses are used to improve gait and limb function following lower limb trauma in specialty centers. However, the effects of commercially available orthoses on center of pressure progression and patient perception of orthosis smoothness during walking are poorly understood.

Methods

In total, 16 participants with a unilateral lower extremity traumatic injury underwent gait analysis when walking without an orthosis, and while wearing monolithic and modular devices, in a randomized order. Device alignment, stiffness, participant rating of perceived device smoothness, center of pressure velocity, and ankle zero moment crossing were assessed.

Findings

The modular device was approximately twice as stiff as the monolithic device. Alignment, smoothness ratings, peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity, and zero moment crossing were not different between study devices. The time to peak center of pressure velocity occurred significantly later for the modular device compared to the monolithic and no orthosis conditions, with large effect sizes observed.

Interpretation

Commercially available orthoses commonly used to treat limb trauma affect the timing of center of pressure progression relative to walking without an orthosis. Despite multiple design differences, monolithic and modular orthoses included in this study did not differ with respect to other measures of center of pressure progression. Perceived smoothness ratings were approximately 40% greater with the study orthoses as compared to previous studies in specialty centers, which may be due to a more gradual center of pressure progression, as indicted by lower peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity with both study orthoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信