制度框架如何影响社会生态系统?坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉地区天然气开发案例

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Pius Z. Yanda , Victoria H. Moshy , Brown Gwambene , Anselm R. Mwajombe , Samwel Kamoyo
{"title":"制度框架如何影响社会生态系统?坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉地区天然气开发案例","authors":"Pius Z. Yanda ,&nbsp;Victoria H. Moshy ,&nbsp;Brown Gwambene ,&nbsp;Anselm R. Mwajombe ,&nbsp;Samwel Kamoyo","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the crucial influence of institutional frameworks in shaping the resilience of Social-Ecological Systems (SES), focusing on the challenges and opportunities arising from natural gas development in Tanzania's Coastal Area. Despite the economic promise of natural gas discovery and exploitation, managing associated environmental and societal impacts remains a significant challenge. The study uses qualitative methods (key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations) and quantitative data (household questionnaire survey) to analyze governance, institutional capacity, resilience, sustainability, coping mechanisms, and coastal resources management. Applying thematic content analysis to qualitative data identifies critical factors in governance, institutional capacity, relationships among resilience, sustainability, coping mechanisms, and coastal resources management. The study utilized SPSS 20 for quantitative data analysis, incorporating descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. The findings emphasize governance systems' critical role in promoting societal well-being and resilience to social-ecological changes. Nevertheless, the identified limitations in addressing environmental concerns, including fostering community involvement and ensuring transparency, highlight the need to increase levels of participation from local communities in inclusive and participatory decision-making in project areas. Transparent communication, access to information, and capacity building emerge as crucial for building trust and garnering support. Recommendations include advocating inclusivity, safeguarding local institutions, crafting adaptive governance systems, emphasizing the importance of responsiveness to emerging issues, and robust monitoring and evaluation systems. Concrete natural resource management, particularly in natural gas development, is deemed vital to ensure equitable resource allocation, rectify disparities, and enhance sustainability for the SES in the Coastal Area. This study serves as a guiding framework for regions facing similar resource development challenges, emphasizing the imperative of environmental sustainability for a prosperous future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do institutional frameworks influence socio-ecological systems? The case of natural gas development in Mtwara region, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Pius Z. Yanda ,&nbsp;Victoria H. Moshy ,&nbsp;Brown Gwambene ,&nbsp;Anselm R. Mwajombe ,&nbsp;Samwel Kamoyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the crucial influence of institutional frameworks in shaping the resilience of Social-Ecological Systems (SES), focusing on the challenges and opportunities arising from natural gas development in Tanzania's Coastal Area. Despite the economic promise of natural gas discovery and exploitation, managing associated environmental and societal impacts remains a significant challenge. The study uses qualitative methods (key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations) and quantitative data (household questionnaire survey) to analyze governance, institutional capacity, resilience, sustainability, coping mechanisms, and coastal resources management. Applying thematic content analysis to qualitative data identifies critical factors in governance, institutional capacity, relationships among resilience, sustainability, coping mechanisms, and coastal resources management. The study utilized SPSS 20 for quantitative data analysis, incorporating descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. The findings emphasize governance systems' critical role in promoting societal well-being and resilience to social-ecological changes. Nevertheless, the identified limitations in addressing environmental concerns, including fostering community involvement and ensuring transparency, highlight the need to increase levels of participation from local communities in inclusive and participatory decision-making in project areas. Transparent communication, access to information, and capacity building emerge as crucial for building trust and garnering support. Recommendations include advocating inclusivity, safeguarding local institutions, crafting adaptive governance systems, emphasizing the importance of responsiveness to emerging issues, and robust monitoring and evaluation systems. Concrete natural resource management, particularly in natural gas development, is deemed vital to ensure equitable resource allocation, rectify disparities, and enhance sustainability for the SES in the Coastal Area. This study serves as a guiding framework for regions facing similar resource development challenges, emphasizing the imperative of environmental sustainability for a prosperous future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000716\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以坦桑尼亚沿海地区天然气开发带来的挑战和机遇为重点,探讨了制度框架在塑造社会生态系统(SES)复原力方面的重要影响。尽管天然气的发现和开采给经济带来了希望,但管理相关的环境和社会影响仍是一项重大挑战。本研究采用定性方法(关键信息提供者访谈、焦点小组讨论和实地观察)和定量数据(家庭问卷调查)来分析治理、机构能力、复原力、可持续性、应对机制和沿海资源管理。通过对定性数据进行主题内容分析,确定了治理、机构能力、复原力之间的关系、可持续性、应对机制和沿海资源管理中的关键因素。该研究利用 SPSS 20 进行定量数据分析,纳入了描述性统计和二元逻辑回归。研究结果强调了治理系统在促进社会福祉和抵御社会生态变化方面的关键作用。然而,在解决环境问题(包括促进社区参与和确保透明度)方面发现的局限性突出表明,有必要提高当地社区在项目区包容性和参与性决策中的参与程度。透明沟通、信息获取和能力建设对于建立信任和赢得支持至关重要。建议包括倡导包容性、保护地方机构、建立适应性治理系统、强调对新出现的问题作出反应的重要性以及建立健全的监测和评估系统。具体的自然资源管理,尤其是在天然气开发方面,对于确保公平的资源分配、纠正差距和提高沿海地区可持续的生态系统服务至关重要。本研究为面临类似资源开发挑战的地区提供了一个指导框架,强调了环境可持续发展对繁荣未来的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do institutional frameworks influence socio-ecological systems? The case of natural gas development in Mtwara region, Tanzania

This study investigates the crucial influence of institutional frameworks in shaping the resilience of Social-Ecological Systems (SES), focusing on the challenges and opportunities arising from natural gas development in Tanzania's Coastal Area. Despite the economic promise of natural gas discovery and exploitation, managing associated environmental and societal impacts remains a significant challenge. The study uses qualitative methods (key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations) and quantitative data (household questionnaire survey) to analyze governance, institutional capacity, resilience, sustainability, coping mechanisms, and coastal resources management. Applying thematic content analysis to qualitative data identifies critical factors in governance, institutional capacity, relationships among resilience, sustainability, coping mechanisms, and coastal resources management. The study utilized SPSS 20 for quantitative data analysis, incorporating descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. The findings emphasize governance systems' critical role in promoting societal well-being and resilience to social-ecological changes. Nevertheless, the identified limitations in addressing environmental concerns, including fostering community involvement and ensuring transparency, highlight the need to increase levels of participation from local communities in inclusive and participatory decision-making in project areas. Transparent communication, access to information, and capacity building emerge as crucial for building trust and garnering support. Recommendations include advocating inclusivity, safeguarding local institutions, crafting adaptive governance systems, emphasizing the importance of responsiveness to emerging issues, and robust monitoring and evaluation systems. Concrete natural resource management, particularly in natural gas development, is deemed vital to ensure equitable resource allocation, rectify disparities, and enhance sustainability for the SES in the Coastal Area. This study serves as a guiding framework for regions facing similar resource development challenges, emphasizing the imperative of environmental sustainability for a prosperous future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信