[通过与处方记录审查的比较,评估药物流行病学研究中自我报告用药情况的有效性]。

Rina Yajima, Minako Matsumoto, Miho Iida, Sei Harada, Takuma Shibuki, Aya Hirata, Kazuyo Kuwabara, Naoko Miyagawa, Tomonori Nakamura, Tomonori Okamura, Toru Takebayashi
{"title":"[通过与处方记录审查的比较,评估药物流行病学研究中自我报告用药情况的有效性]。","authors":"Rina Yajima, Minako Matsumoto, Miho Iida, Sei Harada, Takuma Shibuki, Aya Hirata, Kazuyo Kuwabara, Naoko Miyagawa, Tomonori Nakamura, Tomonori Okamura, Toru Takebayashi","doi":"10.11236/jph.23-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives Although self-reported questionnaires are widely used to collect information on medication use in epidemiological studies, their validity for studies involving older adults has not been sufficiently assessed. This study evaluated the validity of self-reported medication use using questionnaires in comparison with drug notebooks.Methods The study enrolled 370 older community dwellers who participated in an aging sub-study survey of the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study between April 2019 and March 2021. Medication use was assessed by comparing self-reported questionnaire data with drug notebook records. We analyzed medications used for hypertension, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, angina, diabetes, rheumatism, osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease, constipation, anxiety/depression, dementia, asthma, allergy, thrombosis, and thyroid disease. Moreover, gastrointestinal (GI) medications, steroids, and antipyretic analgesics were assessed, and data on injectable medications for osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease was collected. Using drug notebook records, we identified regular medication users by assessing whether they had received oral medication prescriptions covering over 28 days and took the medication within the 90 days preceding the day of their survey. To define medication categories, we used Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated for each medication using drug notebooks as standards. Those who did not bring their drug notebooks on the day of the survey were defined as non-medication users.Results The mean age (standard deviation) of the 370 participants (146 men and 224 women) was 73.3 (4.0) years. The sensitivity and specificity for each medication were as follows: hypertension (0.97, 0.97), dyslipidemia (0.93, 0.98), myocardial infarction (0.24, 0.99), diabetes (0.94, 1.00), rheumatism (1.00, 1.00), osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease (0.82, 0.99), constipation (0.71, 0.98), GI conditions (0.63, 0.97), anxiety/depression (0.36, 1.00), dementia (0.67, 1.00), asthma (0.67, 0.98), allergy (0.57, 0.99), thrombosis (0.88, 0.98), steroids (0.80, 0.99), thyroid disease (1.00, 1.00) and antipyretic analgesics (0.75, 0.96).Conclusions Although sensitivity and specificity differed by medication categories, the results of our population-based cohort study suggested that self-reported questionnaires on medication use among older adults are valid, especially for medications with high sensitivity (≥ 0.8).</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"430-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validity assessment of self-reported medication use in a pharmacoepidemiologic study by comparison with prescription record review].\",\"authors\":\"Rina Yajima, Minako Matsumoto, Miho Iida, Sei Harada, Takuma Shibuki, Aya Hirata, Kazuyo Kuwabara, Naoko Miyagawa, Tomonori Nakamura, Tomonori Okamura, Toru Takebayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.11236/jph.23-110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives Although self-reported questionnaires are widely used to collect information on medication use in epidemiological studies, their validity for studies involving older adults has not been sufficiently assessed. This study evaluated the validity of self-reported medication use using questionnaires in comparison with drug notebooks.Methods The study enrolled 370 older community dwellers who participated in an aging sub-study survey of the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study between April 2019 and March 2021. Medication use was assessed by comparing self-reported questionnaire data with drug notebook records. We analyzed medications used for hypertension, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, angina, diabetes, rheumatism, osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease, constipation, anxiety/depression, dementia, asthma, allergy, thrombosis, and thyroid disease. Moreover, gastrointestinal (GI) medications, steroids, and antipyretic analgesics were assessed, and data on injectable medications for osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease was collected. Using drug notebook records, we identified regular medication users by assessing whether they had received oral medication prescriptions covering over 28 days and took the medication within the 90 days preceding the day of their survey. To define medication categories, we used Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated for each medication using drug notebooks as standards. Those who did not bring their drug notebooks on the day of the survey were defined as non-medication users.Results The mean age (standard deviation) of the 370 participants (146 men and 224 women) was 73.3 (4.0) years. The sensitivity and specificity for each medication were as follows: hypertension (0.97, 0.97), dyslipidemia (0.93, 0.98), myocardial infarction (0.24, 0.99), diabetes (0.94, 1.00), rheumatism (1.00, 1.00), osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease (0.82, 0.99), constipation (0.71, 0.98), GI conditions (0.63, 0.97), anxiety/depression (0.36, 1.00), dementia (0.67, 1.00), asthma (0.67, 0.98), allergy (0.57, 0.99), thrombosis (0.88, 0.98), steroids (0.80, 0.99), thyroid disease (1.00, 1.00) and antipyretic analgesics (0.75, 0.96).Conclusions Although sensitivity and specificity differed by medication categories, the results of our population-based cohort study suggested that self-reported questionnaires on medication use among older adults are valid, especially for medications with high sensitivity (≥ 0.8).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"430-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.23-110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.23-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 虽然在流行病学研究中,自我报告问卷被广泛用于收集药物使用信息,但其在涉及老年人的研究中的有效性尚未得到充分评估。本研究评估了使用调查问卷与药物笔记本相比,自我报告药物使用情况的有效性。方法 本研究招募了 370 名老年社区居民,他们在 2019 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间参加了鹤冈代谢组学队列研究的老龄化子研究调查。通过比较自我报告的问卷数据和药物笔记本记录,对药物使用情况进行了评估。我们分析了高血压、血脂异常、心肌梗塞、心绞痛、糖尿病、风湿病、骨质疏松症/代谢性骨病、便秘、焦虑/抑郁、痴呆、哮喘、过敏、血栓和甲状腺疾病的用药情况。此外,我们还对胃肠道(GI)药物、类固醇和解热镇痛药进行了评估,并收集了治疗骨质疏松症/代谢性骨病的注射药物数据。通过药物笔记本记录,我们确定了定期用药者,方法是评估他们是否收到过超过 28 天的口服药物处方,并在调查日前 90 天内服用过药物。为了确定药物类别,我们使用了解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类代码。我们以药物笔记本为标准,计算了每种药物的敏感性、特异性和卡帕统计量。结果 370 名参与者(男性 146 人,女性 224 人)的平均年龄(标准差)为 73.3 (4.0)岁。每种药物的敏感性和特异性如下:高血压(0.97,0.97)、血脂异常(0.93,0.98)、心肌梗塞(0.24,0.99)、糖尿病(0.94,1.00)、风湿病(1.00,1.00)、骨质疏松症/代谢性骨病(0.82,0.99)、便秘(0.71,0.98)、消化道疾病(0.63,0.97)、焦虑/抑郁(0.36,1.00)、痴呆(0.67,1.00)、哮喘(0.67,0.98)、过敏(0.57,0.99)、血栓形成(0.88,0.98)、类固醇(0.80,0.99)、甲状腺疾病(1.00,1.00)和解热镇痛药(0.75,0.96)。结论 虽然不同药物类别的灵敏度和特异性不同,但我们基于人群的队列研究结果表明,老年人自我报告的用药问卷是有效的,尤其是对于灵敏度较高(≥ 0.8)的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validity assessment of self-reported medication use in a pharmacoepidemiologic study by comparison with prescription record review].

Objectives Although self-reported questionnaires are widely used to collect information on medication use in epidemiological studies, their validity for studies involving older adults has not been sufficiently assessed. This study evaluated the validity of self-reported medication use using questionnaires in comparison with drug notebooks.Methods The study enrolled 370 older community dwellers who participated in an aging sub-study survey of the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study between April 2019 and March 2021. Medication use was assessed by comparing self-reported questionnaire data with drug notebook records. We analyzed medications used for hypertension, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, angina, diabetes, rheumatism, osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease, constipation, anxiety/depression, dementia, asthma, allergy, thrombosis, and thyroid disease. Moreover, gastrointestinal (GI) medications, steroids, and antipyretic analgesics were assessed, and data on injectable medications for osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease was collected. Using drug notebook records, we identified regular medication users by assessing whether they had received oral medication prescriptions covering over 28 days and took the medication within the 90 days preceding the day of their survey. To define medication categories, we used Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated for each medication using drug notebooks as standards. Those who did not bring their drug notebooks on the day of the survey were defined as non-medication users.Results The mean age (standard deviation) of the 370 participants (146 men and 224 women) was 73.3 (4.0) years. The sensitivity and specificity for each medication were as follows: hypertension (0.97, 0.97), dyslipidemia (0.93, 0.98), myocardial infarction (0.24, 0.99), diabetes (0.94, 1.00), rheumatism (1.00, 1.00), osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease (0.82, 0.99), constipation (0.71, 0.98), GI conditions (0.63, 0.97), anxiety/depression (0.36, 1.00), dementia (0.67, 1.00), asthma (0.67, 0.98), allergy (0.57, 0.99), thrombosis (0.88, 0.98), steroids (0.80, 0.99), thyroid disease (1.00, 1.00) and antipyretic analgesics (0.75, 0.96).Conclusions Although sensitivity and specificity differed by medication categories, the results of our population-based cohort study suggested that self-reported questionnaires on medication use among older adults are valid, especially for medications with high sensitivity (≥ 0.8).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信