阑尾切除术后阑尾尖端残留物引发的阑尾肿瘤:两例报告。

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Yusuke Fujii, Koya Hida, Akihiko Sugimoto, Ryohei Nishijima, Masakazu Fujimoto, Nobuaki Hoshino, Hisatsugu Maekawa, Ryosuke Okamura, Yoshiro Itatani, Kazutaka Obama
{"title":"阑尾切除术后阑尾尖端残留物引发的阑尾肿瘤:两例报告。","authors":"Yusuke Fujii, Koya Hida, Akihiko Sugimoto, Ryohei Nishijima, Masakazu Fujimoto, Nobuaki Hoshino, Hisatsugu Maekawa, Ryosuke Okamura, Yoshiro Itatani, Kazutaka Obama","doi":"10.1186/s40792-024-01936-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoplasms derived from remnant appendix are rarely described, with most cases arising from the appendiceal \"stump\". Here, we present two surgical cases of appendiceal neoplasms derived from appendiceal \"tip\" remnants.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The first patient was a 71-year-old man who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis 12 years prior. During appendectomy, the appendiceal root was ligated, but the appendix was not completely removed due to severe inflammation. At the most recent presentation, computed tomography (CT) was performed to examine choledocholithiasis, which incidentally revealed a cystic lesion of approximately 90 mm adjacent to the cecum. A retrospective review revealed that the cystic lesion had increased in size over time, and laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. Pathology revealed no continuity from the appendiceal orifice to the cyst, and a diagnosis of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) was made from the appendiceal tip remnant. The patient was discharged without complications. The second patient was a 65-year-old man who had undergone surgery for peritonitis due to severe appendicitis 21 years prior. During this operation, the appendix could not be clearly identified due to severe inflammation; consequently, cecal resection was performed. He was referred to our department with a chief complaint of general fatigue and loss of appetite and a cystic lesion of approximately 85 mm close to the cecum that had increased over time. CT showed irregular wall thickening, and malignancy could not be ruled out; therefore, laparoscopic ileocecal resection with D3 lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma (TXN0M0) arising from the remnant appendiceal tip. The patient is undergoing follow-up without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, with no evidence of pseudomyxoma peritonei or cancer recurrence for 32 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If appendicitis-associated inflammation is sufficiently severe that accurate identification of the appendix is difficult, it may remain on the apical side of the appendix, even if the root of the appendix is ligated and removed. If the appendectomy is terminated incompletely, it is necessary to check for the presence of a residual appendix postoperatively and provide appropriate follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":22096,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appendiceal neoplasms derived from appendiceal tip remnants following appendectomy: a report of two cases.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Fujii, Koya Hida, Akihiko Sugimoto, Ryohei Nishijima, Masakazu Fujimoto, Nobuaki Hoshino, Hisatsugu Maekawa, Ryosuke Okamura, Yoshiro Itatani, Kazutaka Obama\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40792-024-01936-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoplasms derived from remnant appendix are rarely described, with most cases arising from the appendiceal \\\"stump\\\". Here, we present two surgical cases of appendiceal neoplasms derived from appendiceal \\\"tip\\\" remnants.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The first patient was a 71-year-old man who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis 12 years prior. During appendectomy, the appendiceal root was ligated, but the appendix was not completely removed due to severe inflammation. At the most recent presentation, computed tomography (CT) was performed to examine choledocholithiasis, which incidentally revealed a cystic lesion of approximately 90 mm adjacent to the cecum. A retrospective review revealed that the cystic lesion had increased in size over time, and laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. Pathology revealed no continuity from the appendiceal orifice to the cyst, and a diagnosis of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) was made from the appendiceal tip remnant. The patient was discharged without complications. The second patient was a 65-year-old man who had undergone surgery for peritonitis due to severe appendicitis 21 years prior. During this operation, the appendix could not be clearly identified due to severe inflammation; consequently, cecal resection was performed. He was referred to our department with a chief complaint of general fatigue and loss of appetite and a cystic lesion of approximately 85 mm close to the cecum that had increased over time. CT showed irregular wall thickening, and malignancy could not be ruled out; therefore, laparoscopic ileocecal resection with D3 lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma (TXN0M0) arising from the remnant appendiceal tip. The patient is undergoing follow-up without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, with no evidence of pseudomyxoma peritonei or cancer recurrence for 32 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If appendicitis-associated inflammation is sufficiently severe that accurate identification of the appendix is difficult, it may remain on the apical side of the appendix, even if the root of the appendix is ligated and removed. If the appendectomy is terminated incompletely, it is necessary to check for the presence of a residual appendix postoperatively and provide appropriate follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Case Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-024-01936-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-024-01936-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由阑尾残端引起的肿瘤很少见,大多数病例都是由阑尾 "残端 "引起的。在此,我们介绍两例由阑尾 "蒂部 "残留物引发阑尾肿瘤的手术病例:第一例患者是一名 71 岁的男性,12 年前曾因急性阑尾炎接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术。阑尾切除术中结扎了阑尾根部,但由于炎症严重,阑尾没有完全切除。最近一次就诊时,患者接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)检查胆总管结石,结果意外发现盲肠附近有一个约 90 毫米的囊性病变。回顾性复查显示,随着时间的推移,囊性病变的体积不断增大,于是进行了腹腔镜回盲肠切除术。病理结果显示,阑尾口与囊肿之间没有连续性,根据阑尾顶端残留物诊断为低级别阑尾粘液瘤(LAMN)。患者出院后未出现并发症。第二名患者是一名 65 岁的男性,21 年前曾因严重阑尾炎导致腹膜炎而接受过手术。在这次手术中,由于炎症严重,阑尾无法清晰辨认,因此进行了盲肠切除术。他因主诉全身乏力、食欲不振以及盲肠附近有一个约 85 毫米的囊性病变并随着时间推移而增大而被转到我科。CT 显示肠壁不规则增厚,无法排除恶性肿瘤的可能性,因此,我们为他实施了腹腔镜回盲部切除术,并进行了 D3 淋巴结清扫。病理诊断显示,残余阑尾顶端发生粘液腺癌(TXN0M0)。患者目前正在接受随访,术后未进行辅助化疗,术后 32 个月未发现假性腹膜瘤或癌症复发的迹象:结论:如果阑尾炎相关炎症严重到难以准确识别阑尾,即使结扎并切除阑尾根部,阑尾仍可能残留在阑尾顶端一侧。如果阑尾切除术未完全结束,则有必要在术后检查是否存在残留阑尾,并提供适当的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appendiceal neoplasms derived from appendiceal tip remnants following appendectomy: a report of two cases.

Background: Neoplasms derived from remnant appendix are rarely described, with most cases arising from the appendiceal "stump". Here, we present two surgical cases of appendiceal neoplasms derived from appendiceal "tip" remnants.

Case presentation: The first patient was a 71-year-old man who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis 12 years prior. During appendectomy, the appendiceal root was ligated, but the appendix was not completely removed due to severe inflammation. At the most recent presentation, computed tomography (CT) was performed to examine choledocholithiasis, which incidentally revealed a cystic lesion of approximately 90 mm adjacent to the cecum. A retrospective review revealed that the cystic lesion had increased in size over time, and laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. Pathology revealed no continuity from the appendiceal orifice to the cyst, and a diagnosis of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) was made from the appendiceal tip remnant. The patient was discharged without complications. The second patient was a 65-year-old man who had undergone surgery for peritonitis due to severe appendicitis 21 years prior. During this operation, the appendix could not be clearly identified due to severe inflammation; consequently, cecal resection was performed. He was referred to our department with a chief complaint of general fatigue and loss of appetite and a cystic lesion of approximately 85 mm close to the cecum that had increased over time. CT showed irregular wall thickening, and malignancy could not be ruled out; therefore, laparoscopic ileocecal resection with D3 lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma (TXN0M0) arising from the remnant appendiceal tip. The patient is undergoing follow-up without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, with no evidence of pseudomyxoma peritonei or cancer recurrence for 32 months postoperatively.

Conclusions: If appendicitis-associated inflammation is sufficiently severe that accurate identification of the appendix is difficult, it may remain on the apical side of the appendix, even if the root of the appendix is ligated and removed. If the appendectomy is terminated incompletely, it is necessary to check for the presence of a residual appendix postoperatively and provide appropriate follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信