[视觉空间忽略症患者的个体间差异:一项回顾性研究]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
C Aparicio-López, A García-Rudolph, P Rodríguez-Rajo, R Sánchez-Carrión, A Enseñat-Cantallops, A García-Molina
{"title":"[视觉空间忽略症患者的个体间差异:一项回顾性研究]。","authors":"C Aparicio-López, A García-Rudolph, P Rodríguez-Rajo, R Sánchez-Carrión, A Enseñat-Cantallops, A García-Molina","doi":"10.33588/rn.7812.2024085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients who have suffered a stroke may present with visuospatial neglect (VSN). In clinical practice, different degrees of impairment can be observed among patients with VSN; however, there is no consensus regarding the criteria and tests used to determine them.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to classify patients with VSH based on their level of impairment and to study their response to computerized cognitive training.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 34 patients (19 men and 15 women) with a mean age of 47.59 ± 8.39 years. All patients underwent a neuropsychological exploration protocol composed of specific tests that assess visuospatial attention and others to evaluate multiple cognitive domains. All participants underwent computerized cognitive training consisting of 15 one-hour sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cluster analysis was performed that divided the sample into three groups: group 1: mildly affected VSN (n = 17), group 2: moderately affected VSN (n = 11), and group 3: severely affected VSN (n = 6). Statistically significant differences were found in all tests of the visuospatial attention protocol, both in the pre-treatment and post-treatment evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are different levels of impairment among patients with VSN, differences that persist after applying computerized cognitive training. These results suggest that the evolution of VSN follows a homogeneous pattern linked to the initial level of impairment. These findings, although preliminary, may be relevant to neurorehabilitation professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Interindividual variability in patients with visuospatial neglect: a retrospective study].\",\"authors\":\"C Aparicio-López, A García-Rudolph, P Rodríguez-Rajo, R Sánchez-Carrión, A Enseñat-Cantallops, A García-Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.33588/rn.7812.2024085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients who have suffered a stroke may present with visuospatial neglect (VSN). In clinical practice, different degrees of impairment can be observed among patients with VSN; however, there is no consensus regarding the criteria and tests used to determine them.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to classify patients with VSH based on their level of impairment and to study their response to computerized cognitive training.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 34 patients (19 men and 15 women) with a mean age of 47.59 ± 8.39 years. All patients underwent a neuropsychological exploration protocol composed of specific tests that assess visuospatial attention and others to evaluate multiple cognitive domains. All participants underwent computerized cognitive training consisting of 15 one-hour sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cluster analysis was performed that divided the sample into three groups: group 1: mildly affected VSN (n = 17), group 2: moderately affected VSN (n = 11), and group 3: severely affected VSN (n = 6). Statistically significant differences were found in all tests of the visuospatial attention protocol, both in the pre-treatment and post-treatment evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are different levels of impairment among patients with VSN, differences that persist after applying computerized cognitive training. These results suggest that the evolution of VSN follows a homogeneous pattern linked to the initial level of impairment. These findings, although preliminary, may be relevant to neurorehabilitation professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7812.2024085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7812.2024085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言中风患者可能出现视觉空间忽略(VSN)。在临床实践中,可以观察到 VSN 患者存在不同程度的障碍;然而,对于确定这些障碍的标准和测试,目前还没有达成共识。目的:本研究旨在根据 VSH 患者的障碍程度对其进行分类,并研究他们对计算机认知训练的反应:样本包括 34 名患者(19 名男性和 15 名女性),平均年龄为 47.59 ± 8.39 岁。所有患者都接受了神经心理学探索方案,该方案由评估视觉空间注意力的特定测试和评估多个认知领域的其他测试组成。所有参与者都接受了计算机化认知训练,共 15 次,每次一小时:聚类分析将样本分为三组:第一组:轻度 VSN 患者(17 人);第二组:中度 VSN 患者(11 人);第三组:重度 VSN 患者(6 人)。无论是在治疗前还是在治疗后评估中,视觉空间注意力方案的所有测试均存在统计学意义上的明显差异:结论:VSN 患者存在不同程度的障碍,这种差异在应用计算机认知训练后依然存在。这些结果表明,VSN 的演变遵循一种与最初障碍程度相关的同质模式。这些发现虽然是初步的,但可能与神经康复专业人员有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Interindividual variability in patients with visuospatial neglect: a retrospective study].

Introduction: Patients who have suffered a stroke may present with visuospatial neglect (VSN). In clinical practice, different degrees of impairment can be observed among patients with VSN; however, there is no consensus regarding the criteria and tests used to determine them.

Aim: This study aims to classify patients with VSH based on their level of impairment and to study their response to computerized cognitive training.

Patients and methods: The sample consisted of 34 patients (19 men and 15 women) with a mean age of 47.59 ± 8.39 years. All patients underwent a neuropsychological exploration protocol composed of specific tests that assess visuospatial attention and others to evaluate multiple cognitive domains. All participants underwent computerized cognitive training consisting of 15 one-hour sessions.

Results: A cluster analysis was performed that divided the sample into three groups: group 1: mildly affected VSN (n = 17), group 2: moderately affected VSN (n = 11), and group 3: severely affected VSN (n = 6). Statistically significant differences were found in all tests of the visuospatial attention protocol, both in the pre-treatment and post-treatment evaluation.

Conclusions: There are different levels of impairment among patients with VSN, differences that persist after applying computerized cognitive training. These results suggest that the evolution of VSN follows a homogeneous pattern linked to the initial level of impairment. These findings, although preliminary, may be relevant to neurorehabilitation professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信