斑纹吼猴(Alouatta palliata)在两种自我引导行为中没有优先使用手的表现。

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Primates Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s10329-024-01141-9
Ricardo J Ortíz-Zárate, Ariadna Rangel-Negrín, Alejandro Coyohua-Fuentes, Jurgi Cristóbal-Azkarate, Pedro A D Dias
{"title":"斑纹吼猴(Alouatta palliata)在两种自我引导行为中没有优先使用手的表现。","authors":"Ricardo J Ortíz-Zárate, Ariadna Rangel-Negrín, Alejandro Coyohua-Fuentes, Jurgi Cristóbal-Azkarate, Pedro A D Dias","doi":"10.1007/s10329-024-01141-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hand preference is the preferential use of one hand for a single task. Its study provides insight into the neural mechanisms underlying motor skills, perception, and cognitive functions. From a comparative perspective, it also offers a window into evolutionary history, shedding light on whether manual preferences stem from genetics, environmental influences, or a combination of both. However, there is a paucity of information on preferential hand use for several primate taxa. Here we examine hand preference for the first time in mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) to determine if there is preferential hand use at the individual and population level as well as sex differences in hand use. We followed 17 wild adult individuals for 10 months and used focal animal sampling (506 focal samples) to record hand use in two types of self-directed behaviors, touching (1246 events) and scratching (1115 events). According to the binomial tests, four individuals were right-hand-preferent, two were left-hand-preferent, and 11 were ambilateral during touching, whereas for scratching seven individuals were right-hand-preferent, two were left-hand-preferent, and eight were ambilateral. At the population level, there was ambilaterality in both behaviors. At the individual level, according to the HI index, hand preference in touching and scratching were not associated and did not vary between sexes. These findings concur with previous studies with howler monkeys and other taxa suggesting that population-level hand preference is not a universal trait across primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20468,"journal":{"name":"Primates","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) show no preferential hand use in two self-directed behaviors.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo J Ortíz-Zárate, Ariadna Rangel-Negrín, Alejandro Coyohua-Fuentes, Jurgi Cristóbal-Azkarate, Pedro A D Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10329-024-01141-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hand preference is the preferential use of one hand for a single task. Its study provides insight into the neural mechanisms underlying motor skills, perception, and cognitive functions. From a comparative perspective, it also offers a window into evolutionary history, shedding light on whether manual preferences stem from genetics, environmental influences, or a combination of both. However, there is a paucity of information on preferential hand use for several primate taxa. Here we examine hand preference for the first time in mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) to determine if there is preferential hand use at the individual and population level as well as sex differences in hand use. We followed 17 wild adult individuals for 10 months and used focal animal sampling (506 focal samples) to record hand use in two types of self-directed behaviors, touching (1246 events) and scratching (1115 events). According to the binomial tests, four individuals were right-hand-preferent, two were left-hand-preferent, and 11 were ambilateral during touching, whereas for scratching seven individuals were right-hand-preferent, two were left-hand-preferent, and eight were ambilateral. At the population level, there was ambilaterality in both behaviors. At the individual level, according to the HI index, hand preference in touching and scratching were not associated and did not vary between sexes. These findings concur with previous studies with howler monkeys and other taxa suggesting that population-level hand preference is not a universal trait across primates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primates\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-024-01141-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primates","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-024-01141-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手部偏好是指在单一任务中优先使用一只手。对它的研究有助于深入了解运动技能、感知和认知功能的神经机制。从比较的角度来看,它还提供了一个了解进化史的窗口,揭示了手的偏好是源于遗传、环境影响还是两者的结合。然而,关于一些灵长类类群的手部偏好的信息却很少。在此,我们首次研究了蝠鲼吼猴(Alouatta palliata)的手部偏好,以确定在个体和种群水平上是否存在手部偏好以及手部使用的性别差异。我们对 17 只野生成年个体进行了长达 10 个月的跟踪研究,并采用重点动物取样法(506 个重点样本)记录了两类自我导向行为中的手部使用情况,即触摸(1246 次)和抓挠(1115 次)。根据二项式检验,在触摸行为中,4只个体偏好右手,2只个体偏好左手,11只个体偏好同侧;而在抓挠行为中,7只个体偏好右手,2只个体偏好左手,8只个体偏好同侧。在群体水平上,这两种行为都是同侧的。在个体水平上,根据 HI 指数,触摸和搔抓的手部偏好与性别无关,也不存在性别差异。这些发现与之前对吼猴和其他类群的研究结果一致,表明群体水平的手部偏好并不是灵长类动物的普遍特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) show no preferential hand use in two self-directed behaviors.

Mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) show no preferential hand use in two self-directed behaviors.

Hand preference is the preferential use of one hand for a single task. Its study provides insight into the neural mechanisms underlying motor skills, perception, and cognitive functions. From a comparative perspective, it also offers a window into evolutionary history, shedding light on whether manual preferences stem from genetics, environmental influences, or a combination of both. However, there is a paucity of information on preferential hand use for several primate taxa. Here we examine hand preference for the first time in mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) to determine if there is preferential hand use at the individual and population level as well as sex differences in hand use. We followed 17 wild adult individuals for 10 months and used focal animal sampling (506 focal samples) to record hand use in two types of self-directed behaviors, touching (1246 events) and scratching (1115 events). According to the binomial tests, four individuals were right-hand-preferent, two were left-hand-preferent, and 11 were ambilateral during touching, whereas for scratching seven individuals were right-hand-preferent, two were left-hand-preferent, and eight were ambilateral. At the population level, there was ambilaterality in both behaviors. At the individual level, according to the HI index, hand preference in touching and scratching were not associated and did not vary between sexes. These findings concur with previous studies with howler monkeys and other taxa suggesting that population-level hand preference is not a universal trait across primates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primates
Primates 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Primates is an international journal of primatology whose aim is to provide a forum for the elucidation of all aspects of primates. The oldest primatological journal, Primates publishes original papers that advance the scientific study of primates, and its scope embraces work in diverse fields covering biological bases of behavior, socio-ecology, learning and cognition, social processes, systematics, evolution, and medicine. Contributions relevant to conservation of natural populations and welfare of captive primates are welcome. Studies focusing on nonprimate species may be considered if their relevance to primatology is clear. Original Articles as well as Review Articles, News and Perspectives, and Book Reviews are included. All manuscripts received are initially screened for suitability by members of the Editorial Board, taking into account style and ethical issues, leading to a swift decision about whether to send the manuscript for external review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信