Mary Nordgulen, Kaylin Lewandowski, Nathan Burkett-Cadena, Derrick Mathias, Brian D Byrd
{"title":"拉克罗斯病毒病媒的休眠行为--使用 Prokopak 和休眠庇护所采集物进行的实地研究收效甚微。","authors":"Mary Nordgulen, Kaylin Lewandowski, Nathan Burkett-Cadena, Derrick Mathias, Brian D Byrd","doi":"10.2987/23-7161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resting adult mosquito collections provide opportunities to sample broad physiological conditions (e.g., blood-engorged, gravid, nectar-engorged, and/or parous) that yield important biological information necessary to understand vector and pathogen transmission ecology. In this study, we evaluated Prokopak aspirations of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelter collections at 4 residences with historical evidence of proximal La Crosse virus (LACV) transmission from May through September 2022. The goal of this study was to investigate these sampling methods in the context of LACV vector biology-focused principally on Aedes triseriatus (primary LACV vector) and 2 invasive species (Ae. albopictus and Ae. japonicus) that likely serve as secondary LACV vectors. Overall, 304 resting shelters and 80 Prokopak collections yielded a grand total of 33 mosquitoes, of which a third were LACV vectors (Ae. triseriatus [n = 1, 3.0%], Ae. albopictus [n = 4, 12.1%], and Ae. japonicus [n = 6, 18.2%]). Anopheles punctipennis (n = 9, 27.2%) was the most frequently collected species followed by Culex erraticus (n = 7, 21.2%), whereas the least frequently collected species were Ae. triseriatus and Cx. pipiens (n = 1, 3.0%). Despite substantial collection efforts, and concurrent gravid-trap evidence of LACV vectors at the collection sites, Prokopak aspiration of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelters did not yield a meaningful number of LACV vectors and thus, as described within, may not be useful adjuncts for the evaluation of LACV ecology and disease risk. Additional approaches to evaluate the resting behavior of these vectors in LACV endemic areas are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LA CROSSE VIRUS VECTOR RESTING BEHAVIORS - FIELD STUDIES WITH PROKOPAK AND RESTING SHELTER COLLECTIONS PROVIDE LOW YIELD.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Nordgulen, Kaylin Lewandowski, Nathan Burkett-Cadena, Derrick Mathias, Brian D Byrd\",\"doi\":\"10.2987/23-7161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resting adult mosquito collections provide opportunities to sample broad physiological conditions (e.g., blood-engorged, gravid, nectar-engorged, and/or parous) that yield important biological information necessary to understand vector and pathogen transmission ecology. In this study, we evaluated Prokopak aspirations of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelter collections at 4 residences with historical evidence of proximal La Crosse virus (LACV) transmission from May through September 2022. The goal of this study was to investigate these sampling methods in the context of LACV vector biology-focused principally on Aedes triseriatus (primary LACV vector) and 2 invasive species (Ae. albopictus and Ae. japonicus) that likely serve as secondary LACV vectors. Overall, 304 resting shelters and 80 Prokopak collections yielded a grand total of 33 mosquitoes, of which a third were LACV vectors (Ae. triseriatus [n = 1, 3.0%], Ae. albopictus [n = 4, 12.1%], and Ae. japonicus [n = 6, 18.2%]). Anopheles punctipennis (n = 9, 27.2%) was the most frequently collected species followed by Culex erraticus (n = 7, 21.2%), whereas the least frequently collected species were Ae. triseriatus and Cx. pipiens (n = 1, 3.0%). Despite substantial collection efforts, and concurrent gravid-trap evidence of LACV vectors at the collection sites, Prokopak aspiration of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelters did not yield a meaningful number of LACV vectors and thus, as described within, may not be useful adjuncts for the evaluation of LACV ecology and disease risk. Additional approaches to evaluate the resting behavior of these vectors in LACV endemic areas are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2987/23-7161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2987/23-7161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
LA CROSSE VIRUS VECTOR RESTING BEHAVIORS - FIELD STUDIES WITH PROKOPAK AND RESTING SHELTER COLLECTIONS PROVIDE LOW YIELD.
Resting adult mosquito collections provide opportunities to sample broad physiological conditions (e.g., blood-engorged, gravid, nectar-engorged, and/or parous) that yield important biological information necessary to understand vector and pathogen transmission ecology. In this study, we evaluated Prokopak aspirations of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelter collections at 4 residences with historical evidence of proximal La Crosse virus (LACV) transmission from May through September 2022. The goal of this study was to investigate these sampling methods in the context of LACV vector biology-focused principally on Aedes triseriatus (primary LACV vector) and 2 invasive species (Ae. albopictus and Ae. japonicus) that likely serve as secondary LACV vectors. Overall, 304 resting shelters and 80 Prokopak collections yielded a grand total of 33 mosquitoes, of which a third were LACV vectors (Ae. triseriatus [n = 1, 3.0%], Ae. albopictus [n = 4, 12.1%], and Ae. japonicus [n = 6, 18.2%]). Anopheles punctipennis (n = 9, 27.2%) was the most frequently collected species followed by Culex erraticus (n = 7, 21.2%), whereas the least frequently collected species were Ae. triseriatus and Cx. pipiens (n = 1, 3.0%). Despite substantial collection efforts, and concurrent gravid-trap evidence of LACV vectors at the collection sites, Prokopak aspiration of Rhododendron spp. and human-powered pop-up resting shelters did not yield a meaningful number of LACV vectors and thus, as described within, may not be useful adjuncts for the evaluation of LACV ecology and disease risk. Additional approaches to evaluate the resting behavior of these vectors in LACV endemic areas are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association (JAMCA) encourages the submission
of previously unpublished manuscripts contributing to the advancement of knowledge of
mosquitoes and other arthropod vectors. The Journal encourages submission of a wide range of
scientific studies that include all aspects of biology, ecology, systematics, and integrated pest
management. Manuscripts exceeding normal length (e. g., monographs) may be accepted for
publication as a supplement to the regular issue.