核磁共振成像在乳腺癌淋巴结标准化评估中的表现:我们为 Node-RADS 做好准备了吗?

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10828-y
Federica Pediconi, Roberto Maroncelli, Marcella Pasculli, Francesca Galati, Giuliana Moffa, Andrea Marra, Andrea Polistena, Veronica Rizzo
{"title":"核磁共振成像在乳腺癌淋巴结标准化评估中的表现:我们为 Node-RADS 做好准备了吗?","authors":"Federica Pediconi, Roberto Maroncelli, Marcella Pasculli, Francesca Galati, Giuliana Moffa, Andrea Marra, Andrea Polistena, Veronica Rizzo","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10828-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Node-RADS score was recently introduced to offer a standardized assessment of lymph node invasion (LNI). We tested its diagnostic performance in accurately predicting LNI in breast cancer (BC) patients with magnetic resonance imaging. The study also explores the consistency of the score across three readers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on BC patients who underwent preoperative breast contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and lymph node dissection between January 2020 and January 2023. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated for different Node-RADS cut-off values. Pathologic results were considered the gold standard. The overall diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). A logistic regression analysis was performed. Cohen's Kappa analysis was used for inter-reader agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final population includes 192 patients and a total of 1134 lymph nodes analyzed (372 metastatic and 762 benign). Increasing the Node-RADS cut-off values, specificity and PPV rose from 71.4% to 100% and 76.7% to 100%, respectively, for Reader 1, 69.4% to 100% and 74.6% to 100% for Reader 2, and from 64.3% to 100% and 72% to 100% for Reader 3. Node-RADS > 2 could be considered the best cut-off value due to its balanced performance. Node-RADS exhibited a similar AUC for the three readers (0.97, 0.93, and 0.93). An excellent inter-reader agreement was found (Kappa values between 0.71 and 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Node-RADS score demonstrated moderate-to-high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with BC, suggesting that the scoring system can aid in the identification of suspicious lymph nodes and facilitate appropriate treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Node-RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes, suggesting that the scoring system can effectively help identify suspicious lymph nodes by staging the disease and providing a global standardized language for clear communication.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Axillary lymphadenopathies in breast cancer are crucial for determining the disease stage. Node-RADS was introduced to provide a standardized evaluation of breast cancer lymph nodes. RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7734-7745"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of MRI for standardized lymph nodes assessment in breast cancer: are we ready for Node-RADS?\",\"authors\":\"Federica Pediconi, Roberto Maroncelli, Marcella Pasculli, Francesca Galati, Giuliana Moffa, Andrea Marra, Andrea Polistena, Veronica Rizzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-10828-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Node-RADS score was recently introduced to offer a standardized assessment of lymph node invasion (LNI). We tested its diagnostic performance in accurately predicting LNI in breast cancer (BC) patients with magnetic resonance imaging. The study also explores the consistency of the score across three readers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on BC patients who underwent preoperative breast contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and lymph node dissection between January 2020 and January 2023. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated for different Node-RADS cut-off values. Pathologic results were considered the gold standard. The overall diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). A logistic regression analysis was performed. Cohen's Kappa analysis was used for inter-reader agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final population includes 192 patients and a total of 1134 lymph nodes analyzed (372 metastatic and 762 benign). Increasing the Node-RADS cut-off values, specificity and PPV rose from 71.4% to 100% and 76.7% to 100%, respectively, for Reader 1, 69.4% to 100% and 74.6% to 100% for Reader 2, and from 64.3% to 100% and 72% to 100% for Reader 3. Node-RADS > 2 could be considered the best cut-off value due to its balanced performance. Node-RADS exhibited a similar AUC for the three readers (0.97, 0.93, and 0.93). An excellent inter-reader agreement was found (Kappa values between 0.71 and 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Node-RADS score demonstrated moderate-to-high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with BC, suggesting that the scoring system can aid in the identification of suspicious lymph nodes and facilitate appropriate treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Node-RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes, suggesting that the scoring system can effectively help identify suspicious lymph nodes by staging the disease and providing a global standardized language for clear communication.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Axillary lymphadenopathies in breast cancer are crucial for determining the disease stage. Node-RADS was introduced to provide a standardized evaluation of breast cancer lymph nodes. RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7734-7745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10828-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10828-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近推出的 Node-RADS 评分可对淋巴结侵犯(LNI)进行标准化评估。我们测试了它在通过磁共振成像准确预测乳腺癌(BC)患者 LNI 方面的诊断性能。研究还探讨了该评分在三位读者中的一致性:对 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间接受术前乳腺对比增强磁共振成像和淋巴结清扫术的 BC 患者进行了回顾性研究。计算了不同 Node-RADS 截断值的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值。病理结果被视为金标准。使用接收者操作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估整体诊断性能。进行了逻辑回归分析。阅读者之间的一致性采用 Cohen's Kappa 分析:最终的研究对象包括 192 名患者,共分析了 1134 个淋巴结(372 个转移性淋巴结和 762 个良性淋巴结)。随着 Node-RADS 临界值的增加,阅读器 1 的特异性和 PPV 分别从 71.4% 和 76.7% 上升到 100%,阅读器 2 的特异性和 PPV 分别从 69.4% 和 74.6% 上升到 100%,阅读器 3 的特异性和 PPV 分别从 64.3% 和 72% 上升到 100%。由于性能均衡,Node-RADS > 2 可被视为最佳临界值。三位读者的 Node-RADS AUC 值相似(0.97、0.93 和 0.93)。读者之间的一致性极佳(Kappa 值介于 0.71 和 0.83 之间):结论:Node-RADS评分在识别BC患者LNI方面显示出中等至高等的总体准确性,表明该评分系统可帮助识别可疑淋巴结,并有助于做出适当的治疗决定:Node-RADS>2可视为鉴别恶性淋巴结的最佳临界值,这表明该评分系统可通过对疾病进行分期来有效帮助识别可疑淋巴结,并为清晰交流提供全球标准化语言:要点:乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结病变是确定疾病分期的关键。引入 Node-RADS 是为了对乳腺癌淋巴结进行标准化评估。RADS > 2 可视为鉴别恶性结节的最佳临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance of MRI for standardized lymph nodes assessment in breast cancer: are we ready for Node-RADS?

Performance of MRI for standardized lymph nodes assessment in breast cancer: are we ready for Node-RADS?

Objectives: The Node-RADS score was recently introduced to offer a standardized assessment of lymph node invasion (LNI). We tested its diagnostic performance in accurately predicting LNI in breast cancer (BC) patients with magnetic resonance imaging. The study also explores the consistency of the score across three readers.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on BC patients who underwent preoperative breast contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and lymph node dissection between January 2020 and January 2023. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated for different Node-RADS cut-off values. Pathologic results were considered the gold standard. The overall diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). A logistic regression analysis was performed. Cohen's Kappa analysis was used for inter-reader agreement.

Results: The final population includes 192 patients and a total of 1134 lymph nodes analyzed (372 metastatic and 762 benign). Increasing the Node-RADS cut-off values, specificity and PPV rose from 71.4% to 100% and 76.7% to 100%, respectively, for Reader 1, 69.4% to 100% and 74.6% to 100% for Reader 2, and from 64.3% to 100% and 72% to 100% for Reader 3. Node-RADS > 2 could be considered the best cut-off value due to its balanced performance. Node-RADS exhibited a similar AUC for the three readers (0.97, 0.93, and 0.93). An excellent inter-reader agreement was found (Kappa values between 0.71 and 0.83).

Conclusions: The Node-RADS score demonstrated moderate-to-high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with BC, suggesting that the scoring system can aid in the identification of suspicious lymph nodes and facilitate appropriate treatment decisions.

Clinical relevance statement: Node-RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes, suggesting that the scoring system can effectively help identify suspicious lymph nodes by staging the disease and providing a global standardized language for clear communication.

Key points: Axillary lymphadenopathies in breast cancer are crucial for determining the disease stage. Node-RADS was introduced to provide a standardized evaluation of breast cancer lymph nodes. RADS > 2 can be considered the best cut-off for discriminating malignant nodes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信