HPPD 抑制剂美索替龙从大鼠到人类的种间外推数据推导系数 (DDEF)。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Critical Reviews in Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174
Alison M Pecquet, Katy Bridgwood, David Cowie, Angela Hofstra, Yaoxing Wu, Sarah Whalley, Steven D Webb
{"title":"HPPD 抑制剂美索替龙从大鼠到人类的种间外推数据推导系数 (DDEF)。","authors":"Alison M Pecquet, Katy Bridgwood, David Cowie, Angela Hofstra, Yaoxing Wu, Sarah Whalley, Steven D Webb","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the risk assessment of agrochemicals, there has been a historical paucity of using data to refine the default adjustment factors, even though large datasets are available to support this. The current state of the science for addressing uncertainty regarding animal to human extrapolation (AF<sub>A</sub>) is to develop a \"data-derived\" adjustment factor (DDEF) to quantify such differences, if data are available. Toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) differences between species can be utilized for the DDEF, with human datasets being ideal yet rare. We identified a case for a currently registered herbicide, mesotrione, in which human TK and TD are available. This case study outlines an approach for the development of DDEFs using comparative human and animal data and based on an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenol pyruvate dioxygenase (HHPD). The calculated DDEF for rat to human extrapolation (AF<sub>A</sub>) for kinetics (AF<sub>AK</sub> = 2.5) was multiplied by the AF<sub>A</sub> for dynamics (AF<sub>AD</sub> = 0.3) resulting in a composite DDEF of ∼1 (AF<sub>A</sub> = 0.75). This reflects the AOP and available scientific evidence that humans are less sensitive than rats to the effects of HPPD inhibitors. Further analyses were conducted utilizing <i>in vitro</i> datasets from hepatocytes and liver cytosols and extrapolated to whole animal using <i>in vitro</i> to <i>in vivo</i> extrapolation (IVIVE) to support toxicodynamic extrapolation. The <i>in vitro</i> datasets resulted in the same AF<sub>AD</sub> as derived for <i>in vivo</i> data (AF<sub>AD</sub> = 0.3). These analyses demonstrate that a majority of the species differences are related to toxicodynamics. Future work with additional <i>in vitro/in vivo</i> datasets for other HPPD inhibitors and cell types will further support this result. This work demonstrates utilization of all available toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to replace default uncertainty factors for agrochemical human health risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data derived extrapolation factors (DDEFs) for rat to human interspecies extrapolation for the HPPD inhibitor mesotrione.\",\"authors\":\"Alison M Pecquet, Katy Bridgwood, David Cowie, Angela Hofstra, Yaoxing Wu, Sarah Whalley, Steven D Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the risk assessment of agrochemicals, there has been a historical paucity of using data to refine the default adjustment factors, even though large datasets are available to support this. The current state of the science for addressing uncertainty regarding animal to human extrapolation (AF<sub>A</sub>) is to develop a \\\"data-derived\\\" adjustment factor (DDEF) to quantify such differences, if data are available. Toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) differences between species can be utilized for the DDEF, with human datasets being ideal yet rare. We identified a case for a currently registered herbicide, mesotrione, in which human TK and TD are available. This case study outlines an approach for the development of DDEFs using comparative human and animal data and based on an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenol pyruvate dioxygenase (HHPD). The calculated DDEF for rat to human extrapolation (AF<sub>A</sub>) for kinetics (AF<sub>AK</sub> = 2.5) was multiplied by the AF<sub>A</sub> for dynamics (AF<sub>AD</sub> = 0.3) resulting in a composite DDEF of ∼1 (AF<sub>A</sub> = 0.75). This reflects the AOP and available scientific evidence that humans are less sensitive than rats to the effects of HPPD inhibitors. Further analyses were conducted utilizing <i>in vitro</i> datasets from hepatocytes and liver cytosols and extrapolated to whole animal using <i>in vitro</i> to <i>in vivo</i> extrapolation (IVIVE) to support toxicodynamic extrapolation. The <i>in vitro</i> datasets resulted in the same AF<sub>AD</sub> as derived for <i>in vivo</i> data (AF<sub>AD</sub> = 0.3). These analyses demonstrate that a majority of the species differences are related to toxicodynamics. Future work with additional <i>in vitro/in vivo</i> datasets for other HPPD inhibitors and cell types will further support this result. This work demonstrates utilization of all available toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to replace default uncertainty factors for agrochemical human health risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Reviews in Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Reviews in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在农用化学品的风险评估中,历来很少使用数据来完善默认的调整系数,尽管有大量的数据集可以支持这一点。目前,解决从动物到人的外推法(AFA)不确定性的科学方法是,如果数据可用,则开发一种 "数据衍生 "调整因子(DDEF)来量化这种差异。物种间的毒物动力学 (TK) 和毒效学 (TD) 差异可用于 DDEF,而人类数据集是理想但罕见的数据集。我们发现了一种目前已注册的除草剂--间苯三酚--的案例,在这种除草剂中可以获得人类的 TK 和 TD 数据。本案例研究概述了一种利用人类和动物对比数据并基于抑制 4-羟基苯酚丙酮酸二氧酶 (HHPD) 的不良反应途径 (AOP) 来制定 DDEF 的方法。计算得出的从大鼠到人类的动力学外推 DDEF(AFA)(AFAK = 2.5)乘以动力学 AFA(AFAD = 0.3),得出综合 DDEF 为 1∼1(AFA = 0.75)。这反映了 AOP 和现有科学证据表明人类对 HPPD 抑制剂的影响不如大鼠敏感。利用肝细胞和肝细胞溶质的体外数据集进行了进一步分析,并利用体外到体内的外推法(IVIVE)将其外推到整个动物体内,以支持毒效学外推法。体外数据集得出的 AFAD 与体内数据得出的 AFAD 相同(AFAD = 0.3)。这些分析表明,大部分物种差异与毒效学有关。未来针对其他 HPPD 抑制剂和细胞类型使用更多体外/体内数据集的工作将进一步支持这一结果。这项工作表明,可以利用所有可用的毒代动力学和毒效学数据来替代农用化学品人类健康风险评估的默认不确定性因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data derived extrapolation factors (DDEFs) for rat to human interspecies extrapolation for the HPPD inhibitor mesotrione.

In the risk assessment of agrochemicals, there has been a historical paucity of using data to refine the default adjustment factors, even though large datasets are available to support this. The current state of the science for addressing uncertainty regarding animal to human extrapolation (AFA) is to develop a "data-derived" adjustment factor (DDEF) to quantify such differences, if data are available. Toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) differences between species can be utilized for the DDEF, with human datasets being ideal yet rare. We identified a case for a currently registered herbicide, mesotrione, in which human TK and TD are available. This case study outlines an approach for the development of DDEFs using comparative human and animal data and based on an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenol pyruvate dioxygenase (HHPD). The calculated DDEF for rat to human extrapolation (AFA) for kinetics (AFAK = 2.5) was multiplied by the AFA for dynamics (AFAD = 0.3) resulting in a composite DDEF of ∼1 (AFA = 0.75). This reflects the AOP and available scientific evidence that humans are less sensitive than rats to the effects of HPPD inhibitors. Further analyses were conducted utilizing in vitro datasets from hepatocytes and liver cytosols and extrapolated to whole animal using in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) to support toxicodynamic extrapolation. The in vitro datasets resulted in the same AFAD as derived for in vivo data (AFAD = 0.3). These analyses demonstrate that a majority of the species differences are related to toxicodynamics. Future work with additional in vitro/in vivo datasets for other HPPD inhibitors and cell types will further support this result. This work demonstrates utilization of all available toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to replace default uncertainty factors for agrochemical human health risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信