结直肠癌患者的 "肌肉疏松症 "诊断:计算机断层扫描评估综述及提高实用性的新方法。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Hye Jung Cho, Jeonghyun Kang
{"title":"结直肠癌患者的 \"肌肉疏松症 \"诊断:计算机断层扫描评估综述及提高实用性的新方法。","authors":"Hye Jung Cho, Jeonghyun Kang","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.106.6.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, cancer treatment has focused on the stages of the disease; however, recent studies have highlighted the importance of considering the overall health status of patients in the prognosis of cancer. Loss of skeletal muscle, known as sarcopenia, has been found to significantly affect outcomes in many different types of cancers, including colorectal cancer. In this review, we discuss the guidelines for diagnosing sarcopenia, with a specific focus on CT-based assessments. Many groups worldwide, including those in Europe and Asia, have introduced their own diagnostic guidelines for sarcopenia. Seemingly similar yet subtle discrepancies, particularly in the cutoff values used, limit the use of these guidelines in the general population, warranting a more universal guideline. Although CT-based measurements, such as skeletal muscle index and radiodensity, have shown promise in predicting outcomes, the lack of standardized values in these measurements hinders their universal adoption. To overcome these limitations, innovative approaches are being developed to assess changes in muscle mass trajectories and introduce new indices, such as skeletal and appendicular muscle gauges. Additionally, machine learning models have shown superior performance in predicting sarcopenic status, providing an alternative to CT-based diagnosis, particularly after surgery. CT has tremendous benefits and a significant role in visually as well as quantitatively retrieving information on patient body composition. In order to compensate for the limitation of standard cutoff value, 3-dimensional analysis of the CT, artificial intelligence-based body composition analysis, as well as machine learning algorithms for data interpretation and analysis have been proposed and are being utilized. In conclusion, despite the varying definitions of sarcopenia, CT-based measurements coupled with machine-learning models are promising for evaluating patients with cancer. Standardization efforts can improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce the reliance on CT examinations, and make sarcopenia assessments more accessible in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a review of computed tomography-based assessments and emerging ways to enhance practicality.\",\"authors\":\"Hye Jung Cho, Jeonghyun Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/astr.2024.106.6.305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traditionally, cancer treatment has focused on the stages of the disease; however, recent studies have highlighted the importance of considering the overall health status of patients in the prognosis of cancer. Loss of skeletal muscle, known as sarcopenia, has been found to significantly affect outcomes in many different types of cancers, including colorectal cancer. In this review, we discuss the guidelines for diagnosing sarcopenia, with a specific focus on CT-based assessments. Many groups worldwide, including those in Europe and Asia, have introduced their own diagnostic guidelines for sarcopenia. Seemingly similar yet subtle discrepancies, particularly in the cutoff values used, limit the use of these guidelines in the general population, warranting a more universal guideline. Although CT-based measurements, such as skeletal muscle index and radiodensity, have shown promise in predicting outcomes, the lack of standardized values in these measurements hinders their universal adoption. To overcome these limitations, innovative approaches are being developed to assess changes in muscle mass trajectories and introduce new indices, such as skeletal and appendicular muscle gauges. Additionally, machine learning models have shown superior performance in predicting sarcopenic status, providing an alternative to CT-based diagnosis, particularly after surgery. CT has tremendous benefits and a significant role in visually as well as quantitatively retrieving information on patient body composition. In order to compensate for the limitation of standard cutoff value, 3-dimensional analysis of the CT, artificial intelligence-based body composition analysis, as well as machine learning algorithms for data interpretation and analysis have been proposed and are being utilized. In conclusion, despite the varying definitions of sarcopenia, CT-based measurements coupled with machine-learning models are promising for evaluating patients with cancer. Standardization efforts can improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce the reliance on CT examinations, and make sarcopenia assessments more accessible in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164660/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.106.6.305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.106.6.305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,癌症治疗的重点在于疾病的分期;然而,最近的研究强调了在癌症预后中考虑患者整体健康状态的重要性。研究发现,骨骼肌丧失(即 "肌肉疏松症")会严重影响包括结直肠癌在内的多种癌症的预后。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论诊断肌肉疏松症的指南,并特别关注基于 CT 的评估。全球许多团体,包括欧洲和亚洲的团体,都推出了各自的肌肉疏松症诊断指南。这些指南看似相似,实则存在细微差别,尤其是在使用的临界值方面,限制了这些指南在普通人群中的使用,因此有必要制定一个更具普遍性的指南。尽管骨骼肌指数和放射密度等基于 CT 的测量方法在预测预后方面已显示出良好的前景,但这些测量方法缺乏标准化值,阻碍了它们的普及。为了克服这些局限性,目前正在开发创新方法来评估肌肉质量轨迹的变化,并引入新的指数,如骨骼肌和附壁肌指数。此外,机器学习模型在预测肌肉疏松状态方面表现出色,为基于 CT 的诊断提供了替代方案,尤其是在手术后。CT 在直观和定量检索患者身体成分信息方面具有巨大优势和重要作用。为了弥补标准截断值的局限性,CT 的三维分析、基于人工智能的身体成分分析以及用于数据解读和分析的机器学习算法已被提出并投入使用。总之,尽管对 "肌肉疏松症 "的定义不尽相同,但基于 CT 的测量结合机器学习模型,在评估癌症患者方面大有可为。标准化工作可以提高诊断的准确性,减少对 CT 检查的依赖,并使肌少症评估在临床环境中更容易获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a review of computed tomography-based assessments and emerging ways to enhance practicality.

Traditionally, cancer treatment has focused on the stages of the disease; however, recent studies have highlighted the importance of considering the overall health status of patients in the prognosis of cancer. Loss of skeletal muscle, known as sarcopenia, has been found to significantly affect outcomes in many different types of cancers, including colorectal cancer. In this review, we discuss the guidelines for diagnosing sarcopenia, with a specific focus on CT-based assessments. Many groups worldwide, including those in Europe and Asia, have introduced their own diagnostic guidelines for sarcopenia. Seemingly similar yet subtle discrepancies, particularly in the cutoff values used, limit the use of these guidelines in the general population, warranting a more universal guideline. Although CT-based measurements, such as skeletal muscle index and radiodensity, have shown promise in predicting outcomes, the lack of standardized values in these measurements hinders their universal adoption. To overcome these limitations, innovative approaches are being developed to assess changes in muscle mass trajectories and introduce new indices, such as skeletal and appendicular muscle gauges. Additionally, machine learning models have shown superior performance in predicting sarcopenic status, providing an alternative to CT-based diagnosis, particularly after surgery. CT has tremendous benefits and a significant role in visually as well as quantitatively retrieving information on patient body composition. In order to compensate for the limitation of standard cutoff value, 3-dimensional analysis of the CT, artificial intelligence-based body composition analysis, as well as machine learning algorithms for data interpretation and analysis have been proposed and are being utilized. In conclusion, despite the varying definitions of sarcopenia, CT-based measurements coupled with machine-learning models are promising for evaluating patients with cancer. Standardization efforts can improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce the reliance on CT examinations, and make sarcopenia assessments more accessible in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信