髋关节瓣膜撕裂 Myrick THIRD 测试的稳定性可靠性和外部有效性。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Orthopaedic Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-07 DOI:10.1097/NOR.0000000000001029
Karen M Myrick, Richard Feinn
{"title":"髋关节瓣膜撕裂 Myrick THIRD 测试的稳定性可靠性和外部有效性。","authors":"Karen M Myrick, Richard Feinn","doi":"10.1097/NOR.0000000000001029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study is to examine whether the physical examination technique, Myrick The Hip Internal Rotation with Distraction (THIRD), is reliable and valid. The Myrick THIRD test has previously established and documented sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and internal and external validity. The goal of this original research was to demonstrate stability reliability of the Myrick THIRD test when the study is conducted in a clinical setting where the test has not previously been performed, as well as to demonstrate that the Myrick THIRD test has external validity when conducted across multiple examiners in a new setting. The importance of the study reflects current clinical practice and the lack of specific clinical assessment techniques used to determine the source of intra-articular hip pain successfully. Testing included the Myrick THIRD test, magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA), and arthroscopy. The primary outcomes included the results of the MRA, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Myrick THIRD test, and arthroscopy. The inclusion criteria were 18- to 49-year-olds presenting with hip pain. The exclusion criteria included patients younger than 18 and older than 49 years and patients who were willing to undergo MRI arthrogram. A test of paired proportions, correlation, sensitivity, and specificity was performed. The significance level was preset at .05. All 86 patients had a positive Myrick THIRD test, which was confirmed with arthroscopy. Eight of the 11 positive MRI results and 64 of the 74 positive MRA results were confirmed with arthroscopy. The Myrick THIRD test had a statistically significant higher accuracy rate than the MRA (p = .002) but not the MRI (p = .08). Myrick THIRD test showed a significantly higher accuracy rate than MRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":56102,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Nursing","volume":"43 3","pages":"158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability Reliability and External Validity of Myrick THIRD Test for Hip Labral Tears.\",\"authors\":\"Karen M Myrick, Richard Feinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NOR.0000000000001029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of the study is to examine whether the physical examination technique, Myrick The Hip Internal Rotation with Distraction (THIRD), is reliable and valid. The Myrick THIRD test has previously established and documented sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and internal and external validity. The goal of this original research was to demonstrate stability reliability of the Myrick THIRD test when the study is conducted in a clinical setting where the test has not previously been performed, as well as to demonstrate that the Myrick THIRD test has external validity when conducted across multiple examiners in a new setting. The importance of the study reflects current clinical practice and the lack of specific clinical assessment techniques used to determine the source of intra-articular hip pain successfully. Testing included the Myrick THIRD test, magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA), and arthroscopy. The primary outcomes included the results of the MRA, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Myrick THIRD test, and arthroscopy. The inclusion criteria were 18- to 49-year-olds presenting with hip pain. The exclusion criteria included patients younger than 18 and older than 49 years and patients who were willing to undergo MRI arthrogram. A test of paired proportions, correlation, sensitivity, and specificity was performed. The significance level was preset at .05. All 86 patients had a positive Myrick THIRD test, which was confirmed with arthroscopy. Eight of the 11 positive MRI results and 64 of the 74 positive MRA results were confirmed with arthroscopy. The Myrick THIRD test had a statistically significant higher accuracy rate than the MRA (p = .002) but not the MRI (p = .08). Myrick THIRD test showed a significantly higher accuracy rate than MRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Nursing\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"158-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000001029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000001029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是检查物理检查技术--Myrick髋关节牵引内旋(THIRD)--是否可靠有效。Myrick THIRD 测试的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值以及内部和外部有效性均已确定并记录在案。这项原创性研究的目的是证明在以前未进行过该测试的临床环境中进行研究时,Myrick THIRD 测试的稳定性可靠性,以及证明在新环境中由多名检查人员进行测试时,Myrick THIRD 测试的外部有效性。这项研究的重要性反映了当前的临床实践,以及缺乏用于成功确定髋关节内疼痛来源的特定临床评估技术。测试包括迈瑞克 THIRD 测试、磁共振关节造影 (MRA) 和关节镜检查。主要结果包括MRA、磁共振成像(MRI)、Myrick THIRD测试和关节镜检查的结果。纳入标准为 18 至 49 岁的髋关节疼痛患者。排除标准包括年龄小于 18 岁和大于 49 岁的患者,以及愿意接受核磁共振关节镜检查的患者。对配对比例、相关性、敏感性和特异性进行了检验。显著性水平预设为 0.05。所有 86 名患者的 Myrick THIRD 检测结果均为阳性,并经关节镜检查证实。11 例 MRI 阳性结果中的 8 例和 74 例 MRA 阳性结果中的 64 例经关节镜证实。在统计学上,Myrick THIRD 试验的准确率明显高于 MRA(P = 0.002),但低于 MRI(P = 0.08)。Myrick THIRD 试验的准确率明显高于 MRA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability Reliability and External Validity of Myrick THIRD Test for Hip Labral Tears.

The purpose of the study is to examine whether the physical examination technique, Myrick The Hip Internal Rotation with Distraction (THIRD), is reliable and valid. The Myrick THIRD test has previously established and documented sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and internal and external validity. The goal of this original research was to demonstrate stability reliability of the Myrick THIRD test when the study is conducted in a clinical setting where the test has not previously been performed, as well as to demonstrate that the Myrick THIRD test has external validity when conducted across multiple examiners in a new setting. The importance of the study reflects current clinical practice and the lack of specific clinical assessment techniques used to determine the source of intra-articular hip pain successfully. Testing included the Myrick THIRD test, magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA), and arthroscopy. The primary outcomes included the results of the MRA, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Myrick THIRD test, and arthroscopy. The inclusion criteria were 18- to 49-year-olds presenting with hip pain. The exclusion criteria included patients younger than 18 and older than 49 years and patients who were willing to undergo MRI arthrogram. A test of paired proportions, correlation, sensitivity, and specificity was performed. The significance level was preset at .05. All 86 patients had a positive Myrick THIRD test, which was confirmed with arthroscopy. Eight of the 11 positive MRI results and 64 of the 74 positive MRA results were confirmed with arthroscopy. The Myrick THIRD test had a statistically significant higher accuracy rate than the MRA (p = .002) but not the MRI (p = .08). Myrick THIRD test showed a significantly higher accuracy rate than MRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Nursing
Orthopaedic Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Nursing is an international journal providing continuing education for orthopaedic nurses. Focusing on a wide variety of clinical settings - hospital unit, physician"s office, ambulatory care centers, emergency room, operating room, rehabilitation facility, community service programs, the client"s home, and others – Orthopaedic Nursing provides departmental sections on current events, organizational activities, research, product and drug information, and literature findings. Articles reflect a commitment to professional development and the nursing profession as well as clinical, administrative, academic, and research areas of the orthopaedic specialty. Official Journal of the National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses (NAON)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信